Cases

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: . A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002537-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.

201 Md. 225 (1953) 93 A.2d 536 HULL v. HULL (Appeal and Cross-appeal) [No. 13, October Term, 1952.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 7, 1953. The cause was argued before DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ. Michael Paul Smith and W. Albert Menchine, for Margaret V. Hull, appellant and cross-appelle

646 F.3d 583 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. DeShawn LaMont HULL, Appellant. No. 10-3138. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 18, 2011. Filed: July 21, 2011. *585 Brian D. Johnson, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant. Peter E. Deegan, Jr., AUSA, argued, C.J. W

598 F.Supp.2d 823 (2009) Keith D. WILKEY, Plaintiff, v. Greg HULL, Esq. and Millikin & Fitton L.P.A., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-cv-160. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 3, 2009. *825 Eric C. Deters, Attorney at Law, Independence, KY, F. Dennis Alerding, Covington, KY, for Plaintiff. J

10 A.3d 1193 (2010) Robert P. HULL and another v. GRAFTON COUNTY and another. No. 2009-527. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: March 24, 2010. Opinion Issued: October 19, 2010. *1194 William L. O'Brien, of Concord, by brief and orally, for the petitioners. Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, P.A., of Manche

885 P.2d 1153 (1994) 126 Idaho 437 ESTATE OF William R. HULL and Dorothea B. Hull, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Glen WILLIAMS, Defendant-Respondent. No. 21039. Court of Appeals of Idaho. November 30, 1994. *1155 Peterson Law Office, Lewiston, for appellants. Ricks & Ramey, Boise, for respondent.

172 S.W.3d 186 (2005) Jimmy HULL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Nos. 05-04-01584-CR, 05-04-01585-CR, 05-04-01689-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 16, 2005. Rehearing Overruled September 30, 2005. *187 Catherine Bernhard, Red Oak, TX, for Appellant. William T. (Bill) Hill, Jr., La

19 So.3d 404 (2009) De Armand L. HULL, Appellant, v. The LENDING HOUSE, INC., Appellee. No. 3D08-3323. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 2, 2009. Rehearing Denied October 8, 2009. William Pena Wells, Coral Gables, for appellant. Stoll and Orchard, and Stephen P. Orchard, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. Befor

RITAW. GRUBER, Chief Judge | [Appellant, Producers Rice Mill, Inc., brings this appeal from an order granting Rice Hull Specialty Products, Inc.’s, motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellant’s petition for declaratory judgment regarding the parties’ rights and obligations pursuant to an indemnity agreement. The circuit court found that the indem

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 2000 Session BILL D. WRIGHT v. BONNIE S. HULL Appeal from the Chancery Court for Fentress County No. 98-37 Billy Joe White, Chancellor No. M1999-02307-COA-R3-CV - August 16, 2000 Plaintiff/Appellee, Bill D. Wright, sued to set aside a 1986 deed whereby he c

73 F.Supp.2d 1081 (1999) Carolyn CAMPBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jane D. HULL, Defendant. No. Civ-96-444-T-WDB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. April 5, 1999. *1082 Carolyn Campbell, Tucson, AZ, pro se. Christopher F. Clarke, Washington, DC, for Carolyn Campbell, plaintiff. Sloane Haywood, Tucson, AZ, pro

Ellington, Judge. Plaintiff Kace Investments, L.P. (“Kace”) appeals from two orders of the Superior Court of Richmond County. Kace contends the court erred in finding it in civil contempt on February 18, 2005 for failing to comply with prior orders of the court. Kace also contends the court erred in its August 26, 2004 order by allowing defendants/counterclaimants James M. Hull III and Windsor Square, LLC (collectively “Hull

JONES, Vice Chief Justice, specially concurring: I concur in the judgment and rationale of the court. I write separately, however, to remind the parties that today’s opinion, once again, does not resolve the federal question identified and discussed in the concurring opinion in Salt River Pimar-Maricopa Indian Community v. Hull, 190 Ariz. 97,105, 945 P.2d 818, 826 (1997). That discussion, though sti

957 P.2d 984 (1998) 191 Ariz. 441 Armando RUIZ, Linda Aguirre, John Philip Evans, Rosie Garcia, Candido Mercado, Manuel Pena, Jr., Peter Rios, Jr., Macario Saldate IV, Federico Sanchez and Victor Soltero, Plaintiffs/Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, v. Jane Dee HULL, Governor of Arizona; Grant Woods, Attorney General of Arizona; State of Arizona; Arizonans for Official English and Robert D. Park, Intervenors, Defendants/Appelle

705 A.2d 911 (1998) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Dwayne R. HULL, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 9, 1997. Filed January 9, 1998. *912 William P. Murphy, Philadelphia, for appellant. Timothy P. Geary, Asst. Dist. Atty., Vandergrift, for Com., appellee. Before POPOVICH, SAYLOR and OLSZEW

950 P.2d 1141 (1997) 190 Ariz. 520 Governor Jane Dee HULL, Intervenor/Petitioner, v. Hon. Rebecca A. ALBRECHT, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, Respondent Judge, and ROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 66, et al; Lisa Graham Keegan, Superintendent of Public Instruction; State Board of Education; State of Arizona, Real Parties in Interest. No. CV-97-0369-SA.

960 P.2d 634 (1998) 192 Ariz. 34 Governor Jane Dee HULL, Intervenor/Petitioner, v. Hon. Rebecca A. ALBRECHT, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, and Roosevelt Elementary School District No. 66, et al.; Lisa Graham Keegan, Superintendent of Public Instruction; State Board of Education; State of Arizona, Real Parties in Interest, Gilbert Unified Sc

Lewis, J.: Plaintiffs initially filed suit against St. Francis Regional Medical Center (St. Francis), seeking damages for negligence allegedly involved in the birth of their daughter, Angela. St. Francis sought to compare its negligence with the negligence of Dr. Conrado Agustín. Plaintiffs then amended their petition and added Dr. Agustín as a party defendant. St. Francis sought no affirmative relief from Dr. Agustín. The trial

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Stoughton Trailers (“Stoughton”) fired Evan Hull (“Hull”) shortly after he completed an approved one-week leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (2000), and while he was requesting additional FMLA leave. Despite Hull’s claims that Stoughton impermissibly fired him because he requested FMLA leave,

18 P.3d 722 (2001) 199 Ariz. 411 DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, a nonprofit corporation; James A. Slingluff; Timothy J. Flood; and Joanne Finch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellant, v. Governor Jane Dee HULL, Defendant-Appellee, Phelps Dodge Corporation; Salt River Valley Water Users Association; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Intervenors-Appellees.