Cases

27 F.Supp.2d 582 (1998) TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FAYETTE, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and its Secretary, Redevelopment Authority of Allegheny County and its Executive Director, the County of Allegheny, Cheryl Sanders, Cecile White, Cheryl Ulrich, Martha Surratt, Sara H. Williams, Kelly Vick, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Christians for a B

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT DIAMOND, District Judge. Presently before the court are motions to intervene by a number of municipalities in Allegheny County. For the reasons set forth below, the motions will be denied. The Township of South Fayette (“South Fayette”) 'filed a complaint for injunctive relief in this case setting forth therein a number of claims for relief base

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTI, Chief District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Thomas W. Shaffer (“plaintiff’), an attorney formerly employed by Fayette County (the “County”) as an assistant public defender, filed this civil action against Fayette County Commissioner A1 Ambro-sini (“Ambrosini”) and the County (collectively, “defendants”) for allegedly tortious conduct undertaken in connection wi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA SEPTEMBER 2019 TERM _____________ FILED No. 18-0211 November 12, 2019 released at 3:00 p.m. _____________ EDYTHE NASH

RENDERED: AUGUST 29, 2025; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2024-CA-1244-MR BARRY A. SATURDAY AND BARRY A. SATURDAY, ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILDREN, AURORA SATURDAY AND ATHENA SATURDAY APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE JULIE M. GOODMAN, JUDGE ACTION NO. 23-CI-01210

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. Plaintiffs, who include the Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, the Fayette County Branch of the NAACP, and individuals who are African-American registered voters residing in Fayette County, claim that Fayette County’s at-large method of electing members to the Fayette County Board of Commissioners (“BOC”) and Board of Education (“BOE”) violat

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 26-1291 ______________ STANFORD WILLIAMS v. SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI; DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellants ______________ On

827 F.Supp.2d 477 (2011) Terry and Diane KRISS, individually as husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. FAYETTE COUNTY, a municipality; the Fayette County Airport Authority, a municipal unit; Vincent Vicites, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner *478 for Fayette County; Vincent Zapotosky, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner for Fayette County; Sara Rosiek, individually and i

BOLIN, Justice. Hubert M. Norris appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Fayette County Commission (“the Commission”) and the dismissal of his petition for a writ of mandamus. We affirm. I. Undisputed Facts and Procedural History Norris held the office of Sheriff of Fay-ette County for consecutive four-year terms beginning June 1974 until his resignation in May 1

OPINION OF THE COURT RESTANI, Judge. This appeal arises out of a petition for post-conviction review of a state-court con *188 viction for first-degree murder and possession of an instrument of crime entered against Paul Satterfield in 1985. Appellee, Satterfield, was grante

*774 OPINION AND ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on two motions to dismiss. The first motion is brought by defendant Commonwealth of Kentucky. (DE 8). The second motion is brought by the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, the Lexington-Fay-ette Urban County Council, Vice Mayor Linda Gorton, Coun

RENDERED: AUGUST 22, 2024 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2022-SC-0480-DG BLUEGRASS TRUST FOR HISTORIC APPELLANTS PRESERVATION V. ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS NO. 2020-CA-0726 FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT N

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Karen Spease and Craig Spease, Appellants, filed suit against several defendants, including the Honorable Kathleen Oli-vares, Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas. This civil suit arises out of Appellants’ detention at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint by federal agents, their late

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1451 Charles Freeman v. Superintendent Fayette SCI; District Attorney Montgomery County; Attorney General Pennsylvania, Appellants ______________________________

[Cite as Fayette Drywall, Inc. v. Oettinger, 2020-Ohio-6641.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : FAYETTE DRYWALL, INC., et al. : : Appellate Case No. 28636 Plaintiffs-Appellees

911 So.2d 1030 (2005) Stanley STARKS, Appellant v. The CITY OF FAYETTE, Mayor Rogers W. King and the Board of Aldermen of the City of Fayette, Appellees. No. 2004-CA-01451-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. September 27, 2005. *1031 Jeffrey Todd Waycaster, Natchez, attorney for appellant. Kenneth B. Rector, Vicksburg, a

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0002p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 23-1373 _____________ MARTHA STRINGER; PAUL STRINGER v. COUNTY OF BUCKS; MR. ANDREW KOVACH; KYLE WYLIE; JENIFER FORMAN; CRYSTAL BIEMULLER; CHRISTINE CUTEO; JACQUELINE TORRES; C.O. PAGONE; C.O. HINES; C.O. STYERS; JOHN DOES 1-20; C.O. MURDOCH; LA

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-2936 ______________ COUNTY OF BUTLER; COUNTY OF FAYETTE; COUNTY OF GREENE; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON; NANCY GIFFORD; MIKE GIFFORD, husband and wife doing business as Double Image Styling Salon; PRIMA CAPELLI INC, a Pennsylvania Corporation; MIKE KELLY; MARCI MUSTELLO; DARYL METCALFE

ROGERS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which SILER, J., joined. GILMAN, J. (p. 491), delivered a separate opinion concurring with the lead opinion’s analysis. OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. The district court in this case refused to approve a proposed settlement of a Clean Water Act suit brought by the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky against the Lexington-Fay