⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING ) HALE AND DORR LLP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 25-917 (RJL) V. ) ) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE ) PRESIDENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________ _)
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUSMAN GODFREY LLP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25 - 1107 (LLA) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In April 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order targeting the law firm Sus
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 33 Mass. L. Rptr. 267
Salinger, Kenneth W., J. This is the second lawsuit in which W. Robert Allison challenges an alleged conspiracy to freeze out the minority members of Applied Tissue Technologies, LLC (“ATT”). In the first action, Allison is suing the majority members of ATT, which are Elof Eriksson (“Eriksson”) and the two trustees of The Elof Eriksson Irrevocable Trust-2003 (“Eriksson Trust”), Gudren Eriksson and Karl Proppe, who is ATTs chief e
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK S. ZAID, Esq., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-01365 (AHA) v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants. Memorandum Opinion and Order The Constitution forbids government officials from using their power to reta
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JENNER & BLOCK LLP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-916 (JDB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In our constitutional order, few stars are as fixed as the principle that no official “can prescribe what shall be orthodox in polit
New York Court of Appeals · 2010-10-21 · Published · cited 216× · 938 N.E.2d 941; 15 N.Y.3d 446; 912 N.Y.S.2d 512
15 N.Y.3d 446 (2010) 938 N.E.2d 941 912 N.Y.S.2d 512 MARC S. KIRSCHNER, as Trustee of the REFCO LITIGATION TRUST, Appellant, v. KPMG LLP et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF LOUISIANA et al., Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Appellants, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, Respondent. Nos. 1
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2018-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed November 19, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00434-CV TARGET STRIKE, INC., Appellant V. STRASBURGER & PRICE, L.L.P.; DANIEL LANFEAR; DONATO RAMOS; ALFREDO RAMOS; AND THE LAW OFFICE OF DONATO D. RAMOS, PLLC,
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2023-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted in Part and Denied in Part and Opinion filed December 21, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00147-CV NO. 14-23-00148-CV NO. 14-23-00149-CV IN RE SHAWN DEANE GRUSS, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MAURITA J. GALLAGHER; AND NUCLEAR SOURCES AND SERVICES, I
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-01-22 · Published · cited 37× · 762 F. Supp. 2d 543; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6372; 2011 WL 204762
762 F.Supp.2d 543 (2011) COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY, Plaintiff, v. ROPES & GRAY LLP and Matthew P. Vincent, Defendants. No. 10-CV-661 (ADS)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 22, 2011. *545 Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. by Peter I. Bernstein, Esq., Chad E. Ziegler, Esq., of Counsel, Gard
New York Court of Appeals · 2012-04-26 · Published · cited 102× · 19 N.Y.3d 106; 968 N.E.2d 967
*112OPINION OF THE COURT Graffeo, J. Petitioners Albany Law School and Disability Advocates, Inc. provide protection and advocacy services to individuals with developmental disabilities pursuant to contracts with the New York State Commission on Quality of Care and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities, an agency that oversees New York’s protection a
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-11-08 · Published · cited 79× · 908 F.3d 476
Concurrence by Judge Owens WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: *485It is no hyperbole to say that Dulce Garcia embodies the American dream. Born into poverty, Garcia and her parents shared a San Diego house with other families to save money on rent; she was even homeless for a time as a child. But she studied hard and excelled academical
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2014-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 120 F. Supp. 3d 1190; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185338; 2014 WL 10962253
ORDER LEE R. WEST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Since the Treaty of Hopewell was signed on January 3, 1786, by The Choctaw Nation (“Choctaw Nation”) and on January 10, 1786, by The Chickasaw Nation (“Chickasaw Nation”), wherein the United States of America acknowledged that the Choctaw Nation and the Chickasaw Nation were “to be under-[its] protection,” 7 Stat. 21, Article 2; e.g,,
District Court, E.D. California · 2016-02-17 · Published · cited 1× · 163 F. Supp. 3d 769; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19330; 2016 WL 632782
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge The matter is before the Court on cross motions for judgment on the pleadings by Plaintiff the Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) and Defendant the State of California (hereinafter “Defendant”). (ECF Nos. 14, 17.) The Court has carefully considered the factual and legal issues presented in the parties’ filings, and the argum
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-01-19 · Published · cited 55× · 813 F.3d 718; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1101; 2016 WL 229979
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE No. 11-16240 BLIND, on behalf of its members and itself; MICHAEL MAY; MICHAEL D.C. No. HINGSON; CHRISTINA THOMAS, on 3:10-cv-04816- behalf of themselves and all others WHA similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014-01-17 · Published · cited 0×
11-2735-cv (L) The Evergreen Association, Inc. v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2012 (Argued: September 14, 2012 Decided: January 17, 2014) Docket Nos. 11‐2735‐cv, 11‐2929‐cv _____
District Court, District of Columbia · 2004-08-03 · Published · cited 4× · 313 B.R. 73; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15046; 43 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 114
313 B.R. 73 (2004) In re U.S. OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION. Edward C. Dulworth, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. Office Products Co., et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1271. Civil Action No. 3:99CV-636-H. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 3, 2004. *74 *75 Andrew
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-06-09 · Published · cited 9× · 568 F.3d 374; 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1011; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12329; 2009 WL 1587870
568 F.3d 374 (2009) PENSION COMMITTEE OF the UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL PENSION PLAN, The Altar Fund, Aries Trading, Ltd., The Arrowsmith Fund Ltd., Avison Company S.A., Banco Nominees (I.O.M.) Limited, Bank of Bermuda (Luxembourg), S.A., now called HSBC Security Services (Luxembourg) S.A., on behalf of Liberty Ermitage North American Absolute Fund Ltd., Banque Privee Edmond de Rothschild Europe, Caceis Bank Luxembourg, as assignee of Banque Privee Edmond de
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-02-22 · Published · cited 28× · 691 F. Supp. 2d 448; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15489; 2010 WL 648369
691 F.Supp.2d 448 (2010) The PENSION COMMITTEE OF the UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL PENSION PLAN, et al., Plaintiff, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC, Citco Fund Services (Curacao) N.V., the Citco Group Limited, International Fund Services (Ireland) Limited, PricewaterhouseCoopers (Netherland Antilles), John W. Bendall, Jr., Richard Geist, Anthony Stocks, Kieran Conroy, and Declan Quilligan, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 9016(SAS).
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-01-15 · Published · cited 105× · 685 F. Supp. 2d 456; 2010 WL 184312
685 F.Supp.2d 456 (2010) The PENSION COMMITTEE OF the UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL PENSION PLAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC, Citco Fund Services (Curacao) N.V., the Citco Group Limited, International Fund Services (Ireland) Limited, Pricewaterhousecoopers (Netherland Antilles), John W. Bendall, Jr., Richard Geist, Anthony Stocks, Kieran Conroy, and Declan Quilligan, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 9016 (SAS).</