⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE v. PENCE”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-01-04 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-3791 (JEB) VICE PRESIDENT MICHAEL R. PENCE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs’ aims in this election challenge are bold indeed: they ask this Court to declare unconstituti
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022-03-22 · Published · cited 1× · 28 F.4th 1282
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 2, 2021 Decided March 22, 2022 No. 21-5056 WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE, ET AL., APPELLEES v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, VICE PRESIDENT, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE, ET AL., APPELLEES ERICK G. KAARDAL AND MOHRMAN, KAARDAL &
Meredith v. Pencepublic domain
Indiana Supreme Court · 2013-03-26 · Published · cited 60× · 984 N.E.2d 1213; 2013 WL 1213385
On Transfer Pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 56(A) DICKSON, Chief Justice. Asserting violation of three provisions of the Indiana Constitution, the plaintiffs challenge Indiana’s statutory program for providing vouchers to eligible parents for their use in sending their children to private schools. Finding that the challengers have not satisfied the high burden required to invalidate a statute on con
Indiana Supreme Court · 2013-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR Andrew W. Hull Gregory F. Zoeller APPELLEES Alice M. Morical Attorney General of Indiana J. Lee McNeely Hoover Hull, LLP McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Indianapolis, Indiana Thomas M. Fisher Harrold Solicitor General
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 WI 91
2020 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2038 COMPLETE TITLE: Donald J. Trump, Michael R. Pence and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph R. Biden, Kamala D. Harris, Milwaukee County Clerk c/o George L. Christen
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 WI 91
2020 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2038 COMPLETE TITLE: Donald J. Trump, Michael R. Pence and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph R. Biden, Kamala D. Harris, Milwaukee County Clerk c/o George L. Christen
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-06-26 · Published · cited 227× · 582 U.S. 449; 198 L. Ed. 2d 551; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4061; 137 S. Ct. 2012; 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 750; 85 U.S.L.W. 4419; 2017 WL 2722410
We granted certiorari sub nom. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauley, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 891 ,
Thompson v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-02-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) BENNIE G. THOMPSON et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-cv-00400 (APM) ) DONALD J. TRUMP et
Matter of Giulianipublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-06-24 · Published · cited 7× · 146 N.Y.S.3d 266; 197 A.D.3d 1; 2021 NY Slip Op 04086
Matter of Giuliani (2021 NY Slip Op 04086) Matter of Giuliani 2021 NY Slip Op 04086 Decided on June 24, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-05-01 · Published · cited 52× · 251 F. Supp. 2d 176; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7834; 2003 WL 2010983
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM 1 Presently before this three-judge District Court are eleven consolidated actions challenging as unconstitutional the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002) (“BCRA”) and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prohibit its enforcement. The wide range of legal challenges raised by this litigati