Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice CARTER. As a result of a termination proceeding brought by the Texas Department of Fam*10ily and Protective Services (Department), the parental rights of mother Edna Lopez to her five children E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G., and C.G.L., and Francisco Lopez to his two children S.A.L. and J.A.C., were term

ORDER AND OPINION LAWRENCE J. BLOCK, Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs move under Rule 59 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for reconsideration of this Court’s April 16, 2008 opinion in Prati v. United States, 81 Fed.Cl. 422 (2008), dismissing the claims of plaintiffs Ronald C. and Mary G. Prati and 76 other similar AMCOR cases for lack of subjec

Opinion and Order BLOCK, Judge. This action is representative of 77 factually-similar, so-called “AMCOR” partnership tax refund cases, which are consolidated for the purposes of the instant motions. These partnerships comprised part of a group of similarly-structured California limited partnerships that were marketed and managed by American Agri-Corp., Inc. (“AMCOR”). Beginning in 2001, 129 AMCOR tax refund c

94 F.Supp.2d 787 (2000) Esme J. HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CIV. A. H-98-4137. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. April 25, 2000. *788 Thomas E. Redding and Teresa J. Womack, Redding & Associates, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Michael D. Powell, United States D

KETHLEDGE', J., delivered the opinion of the court in which BOGGS, J., joined. BLACK, D.J., (p. 873), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. In 2000, several plaintiffs sued Sunrise Children’s Services and Kentucky, alleging that Kentucky had violated the Establishment Clause by paying Sunrise

_»u,g-,¢qe=m,\.v~,x\m>¢\~_~x==».zo.-w-.u LL [,,... "3 £§E§onh- F, Nm:@_m@om w_>H…_~_ ® wm wake mFoN ._N 4>__§ n 0 MUU,UF“A § _., m go"= >.E

.za_…,,,-,._._….._…,.,_,A.§..§¢.,§z§ m l _ / v"§o. .¢@QQ§@QQ m®®m.mm§ N_Eo 002/5 W_Mow m¢uw m§ mo 22 m._>…_ z_@m>m@_mm ~ :.wh w_momwo>»w__…©w%. “Jld_W S _.= . .\.. §@©@.. ©©©_…§ w §§ n__~ mw ww: E<>§g . _ _ 1a _ , _ go"__ E§_

__:._____.__.__.__,_,_`_*..,.,___.___=_.__._._~_,___~._U_._…__._.._.__...__.______..=. . Nommm. mm,.z.,m`.¢m md No©m\. X.r_ Zm.__m> mm §§ _. v _ _T§Qm §§ §§ , § :www m_ . mFON mNZD_, Nmrmoowooo . @§n©@ w WUD W.F<>E@ M_©m~ >.HJ_

/662-(3 &$• A- c«*s*Mo°°ii-ti-vst-cz- ORIGINAL Tlli'aJ roorT (jtibissv AMo D~hDCr- U-WoM -V ©OUBTOFCRI^INALAPPEALS CRTNSZ-NfaL fiffBAt-S STATE oFT^yas FEB 122015 XMTHE STATE OF at^fl -E£XA££|LEO-iN AMAcosta,Cf©rk COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS N\0TZON fog /?EH£A

MICHBE¢_ LvA/A/ /_EE ibt;,113,;1:,1 1/3 Prc.H)=)/m 53 L¢BLnA/c MA/Z~r~ n ns E 3(¢>‘3§ F,M. 353`/'-/ MAY 25 2[]13 ”BE)¢)L,//wom', mm ’#€Ulos ENTH COURT OF APPEALS SEV V\V|AN LONG. CLERK MA)/ , 310/2 llDuQT m'- HPPEHLS L‘.Lam\ wm+ FIL¢_MDQE,QJITE Q-A AMAR:LL,LD, TEA/)=)g '¥‘i|b\';?fl*(°) RE! Case wumgee'. r>“l~\is-LY>N§~C\/ $\’YLE! Iu m N\ic\\Av_\ Lywh Lu_. Q¢\J=HM ’DEAFL CLE_QK: :L m-_<.pea`jr§;.;\l.lj feol

SHAW, Judge. The appellant/cross-appellee, City of Miami, having voluntarily dismissed its appeal, the claimant’s cross-appeal presents for our consideration the Deputy Commissioner’s denial of temporary partial disability benefits. Claimant, while employed by the City of Miami as a police officer, received a com-pensable head injury. His pre-injury earnings approximated $1,590.00 a month. After being inj

CBL&rskx : C.Q.La. c£^£Xc& ; Qoeku,:t£J^JZ87iA JS&djBtaLI^^ ikkjJBa^^ cMXjoskxi Crus£ UpuL P&m CYW, fe& ev^k*^ Qc&. s^e. -_y^^ JJpLU- i^^^\V^_ai^itad_ Sk^J^y^ RiCEiyEM MAR 13KTT AbslAcosta, Clerk ^ , Ifc^ 6io&fe---c£-- .Ifcyeo.

_/_ _ _w%o_m_l§»_ mO~\.\_ C,D_)\\lsh.l _,L__@m__tuv.v_~m§l\.\__mo_o.a,c,eiw§\~e& ‘n\s r%w»\¢\c,m,./ /i;c_T l _/_G_q_$gz?.__i_'/S.cd 441 41#02»{4~(/. 651 ~Mj_¢. wom:e__o@_\\as 04_1:_______ ( '_£, M)’el»aus_'w/\o ¢£._/_4¢/ a'_,\)) 'LZ.<>{T L;sza'+ ¢)F /~/_ab~eas £o?zp_u§ 110 §~Q.r'_u_ \L>~_Coumj.u ' . /*/)>'2,. lr))` ~UM_~JS /_m‘ [ \L> S~erwJ v»J 0~ ,. l _L~GZ_~LL£¢.LA_@Q{Q_ Y_JE__Q\LL_L\JQZ,Q)__£¢QMJ' de //`l._ed 45 )F /\

GROSS, J. James and Roberta Matthews appeal the September 22, 2015 order denying them motion to quash service of process in a foreclosure case. We affirm the circuit court -and hold that the return of service complied with the applicable Florida Statute. U.S. Bank filed an action to foreclose a mortgage against the Matthews and two other defendants in

MEMORANDUM OPINION Goldberg, District Judge. Plaintiff, Eric Simpson, alleges that following a foot chase, his civil rights were violated when several officers from the Philadelphia Police Department (“PPD”) used excessive force. Plaintiff has filed various federal and state law claims against these officers, and further seeks to impose municipal liability upon the City of Philadelphia (the “City”) pursuant

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Apr 11 2019, 10:33 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court

OPINION * PER CURIAM. Christian Dior Womack, a.k.a. Gucci Prada, citing the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, presents a petition for a writ of mandamus. He describes claims relating to his criminal prosecution similar to those he raised in a previous mandamus petition, which we denied. See In re Womack, No. 15-2064, 606 Fed.Appx. 638, 2015 WL 3514707

\N@"V 5\50 \59555 055%3»:\&=) 77 538 3/ waWNN-USTNC/T 995 5>914“59. »»%55`595995\55_55`5°55\\'5\3 RESPOMSE; 750 F>THT&S; PROPOSED 5155\5055\555555{09€>9 lc>w%, :55&5>/\:{)%7515§5€&0 95/595535\9 951)1);006)09§ QO\\M x \ 99955

No. pp-plow-2015 tOH-IS Taj th£ Av?Ti/i/, T&AS ORIGINAL THE STAT£ 0FTEXAS fn>m fi\pfe*Afto. 0b-H-00OS3-c& Trial GwseM>, 3£G-*2fl W-20L? RECEIVED ^1 COURT OF CR!?.WAU-:--.;'5 JUL 30 2015 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ' JUL 30 2^5 Abel Acosta, Clerk Xtflevt+H~y o-POWg^, Parties,a*d Co^seJ T>£ ft (WOM&

629 S.E.2d 222 (2006) 280 Ga. 454 FINDLEY v. FINDLEY, et al. No. S06A0424. Supreme Court of Georgia. April 25, 2006. *223 Tommy J. Smith, Vidalia, for Appellant. B. Daniel Dubberly, III, Dubberly & McGovern, Glennville, David H. Womack, Claxton, for Appellees. BENHAM, Justice. This