Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION HUGHES, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Motion of Plaintiff Elizabeth Wong (“Plaintiff’) to Compel the Turnover of a Terminated Criminal Investigation File of the Division of Criminal Justice. Defendants Regina Thomas, Micah Rasmussen, Diane Legreide, Jamie Fox, Amy Mansue, Kellie Drakeford, Michael Angulo, State of New Jersey, and New Jersey Hig

840 F.Supp. 727 (1994) Rosalind E. WONG, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS BROS. RESTAURANT CORP., et al., Defendants. Robert H. BALDWIN, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS BROS. RESTAURANT CORP., et al., Defendants. And Related Counterclaims. Nos. CV 92-440 WJR (CTx), CV 92-854 WJR (CTx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 4, 1994. Randall J. Sherman, Stra

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Terrence J. McElrath, J.), dated June 20, 2013. The order granted the father’s petition to modify a prior order of custody of that court so as to award him sole custody of the parties’ child. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Modification of an existing custody or visitation or

THE COURT:* *1051This court has already issued two opinions as a result of appeals in this dispute, which has not yet reached a final determination on the merits at the trial court. (See In re Marriage of Wong (May 25, 2018, G056148,

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a transfer of real property as a fraudulent conveyance, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), entered May 8, 2013, as, after a hearing to determine the validity of service of process, in effect, denied those branches of her motion which were pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) and (4), in effect,

McKAY III, Chief Judge. | ¶ Defendant, Louisiana State University Health Science Center (“LSUHSC”), initially applied for supervisory writs with this Court, seeking to reverse the judgment of the trial court denying its exception of prescription with regard to the plaintiffs’ medical malpractice claim. This Court denied the writ application, finding that LSUHSC had an adequate remedy on appeal. LSUHSC then applied for a writ

BIGELOW, P.J. Kam Hing Wong appeals from a judgment which sentences him to a life sentence for the attempted murder of his wife, Mei O.1 Wong challenges his sentence on appeal, contending the trial court erred when it imposed to a single count three consecutive one-year enhancements for the use of deadly weapons. We agree Penal Code section 6542 prohibits multiple punishment

553 F.3d 650 (2009) THOMAS & WONG GENERAL CONTRACTOR, a Brunei Darussalam corporation, Appellant, v. THE LAKE BANK, N.A., doing business as The Lake Bank, Appellee. No. 08-1213. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 12, 2008. Filed: January 23, 2009. *651 Mark J. Kallenbach, argu

ORDER In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion affirming the judgment of this court and remanding for further proceedings, see United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1625, 191 L.Ed.2d 533 (2015), we in turn REMAND this case to *926the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinions of this court and the Supreme Court.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-1213 ___________ Thomas & Wong General Contractor, * a Brunei Darussalam corporation, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * D

ORDER FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR., Chief Judge. Pending before the Court are (1) Defendant Franklin Credit Management Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Seventh Amended Complaint (Doc. No. *991351); (2) Moving Defendants’1 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Seventh Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 353); (3) Motion to Dism

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, concurring in the judgment: I agree with Judges Tashima and Bea that 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) is jurisdictional, but can’t dissent because a plaintiff like Wong who begins her FTCA action too early can cure the defect by filing a motion to amend the premature complaint. See Valadez-Lopez v. Chertoff, 656 F.3d 851, 855-58 (9th Cir.2011). Wong filed such a motion before she had fin

143 P.3d 1 (2006) Richard Sung Hong WONG, Mari Stone Wong, and Kathleen Wong, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Benjamin CAYETANO, Earl I. Anzai, Margery Bronster, Thomas R. Keller, Lawrence A. Goya, Cynthia Quinn, Hugh R. Jones, Dorothy Sellers, Steve Goodenow, John Tsukiyama, Defendants-Appellees. and John Does 1-25, Defendants. No. 27117. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. July 26, 2006.<

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. This class action was filed by borrowers in Missouri who took out second mortgages on their homes through Bann-Cor Mortgage, Inc. (Bann-Cor), and allege that Bann-Cor and various .assignees and purchasers violated the Missouri Second Mortgage Loan Act (MSMLA) by charging or collecting impermissible fees. The district court

*3MEMORANDUM ** Henry Sir Hin Wong (“Wong”) appeals his sentence of fifteen months imprisonment following a conviction for wilfully assisting the filing of a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) and for making false statements to a federal agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. On appeal, Wong alleges three errors. First, Wong contends t

ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.

*3MEMORANDUM ** Henry Sir Hin Wong (“Wong”) appeals his sentence of fifteen months imprisonment following a conviction for wilfully assisting the filing of a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) and for making false statements to a federal agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. On appeal, Wong alleges three errors. First, Wong contends t

SUMMARY ORDER Harumi Ishijima Wong, Deny Laila, and Sebastian Tan, natives and citizens of Indonesia, seek review of a February 29, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the April 27, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Steven R. Abrams, which denied Petitioners’ application for asylum, and Wong’s application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).2 In

SUMMARY ORDER Harumi Ishijima Wong, Deny Laila, and Sebastian Tan, natives and citizens of Indonesia, seek review of a February 29, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the April 27, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Steven R. Abrams, which denied Petitioners’ application for asylum, and Wong’s application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).2 In

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Bidiman Wong, an ethnic Chinese businessman who is a native and citizen of Indonesia, seeks review of the May 9, 2005, order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the January 26, 2004, decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Patricia A. Rohan denying Wong’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). See In re Bidiman Wong, No. A.