Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “WYETH v. DUDAS”
Wyeth v. Dudaspublic domain
(2008) WYETH, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Jon W. DUDAS, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-1492 (JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 30, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs here t
Wyeth v. Kappospublic domain
591 F.3d 1364 (2010) WYETH and Elan Pharma International Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David J. KAPPOS, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2009-1120. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. January 7, 2010. *1366
Colón Rivera v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Co.public domain
La Jueza Asociada Señora Pabón Charneco emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Comparecen ante nos José Colón Rivera et al. (en ade-lante los peticionarios) y nos solicitan la revisión de una Sentencia emitida por el Tribunal de Apelaciones. Me-diante dicho dictamen, el tribunal a quo revocó una Reso-lución del Tribunal de Primera Instancia que autorizó una Demanda Enmendada en un pleito de índole la
Wyeth Holdings Corp. v. Sebeliuspublic domain
603 F.3d 1291 (2010) WYETH HOLDINGS CORPORATION and Wyeth (now known as Wyeth LLC), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Dr. Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Food and Drug Administration, David Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and United
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1368 WYETH HOLDINGS CORPORATION and WYETH (now known as Wyeth LLC), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen Sebelius, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Dr. Margaret Hamburg, COMMISSIO
Colón Rivera Y Otros v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticalspublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO José J. Colón Rivera y Otros Peticionarios Certiorari v. 2012 TSPR 1 Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Co., 184 DPR ____ Antes Ayerst-Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. y ahora Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, LLP. Recurridos Número del Caso: CC-2010-890 Fecha: 4 de enero de 2012 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Panel Especial de Litig
Wyeth and Elan Pharma International, Ltd. v. Under Sec. of Commerce for Intellectual Propertypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1120 WYETH and ELAN PHARMA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David J. Kappos, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TR
Colón Birriel, Juez Ponente *91TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCION I La peticionaria, Ayerst Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ("Ayerst") solicita la revocación de una resolución emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Guayama, el 29 de octubre de 1997, en el caso que por "Discrimen por Razón de Edad y Nulid
Hawkins v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant appeals the judge of compensation claims’ (JCC’s) order denying his claim for temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits based on a refusal of suitable employment under subsection 440.15(6), Florida Statutes (2008). Because the order on appeal does not set forth sufficient findings to support the denial of TPD benefits for all the relevant time periods, we reverse and
Nieves Roman, Sterling v. Municipio De Aguadillapublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI STERLING NIEVES ROMÁN Recurso de Apelación procedente del Apelante Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de v. Aguadilla MUNICIPIO DE
Alamo Rodriguez, Gladys v. Municipio De Guaynabopublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES Panel Especial WILLIAM H. LÓPEZ Apelación GARCÉS Y GLADYS Procedente de ÁLAMO RODRÍGUEZ Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Apelantes Bayamón KLAN202300894
Ofertas Properties LLC v. Asencio & Son Corp.public domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V OFERTAS PROPERTIES APELACIÓN LLC; RIOS RIVERA procedente del RESTAURNATS, INC. Tribunal de Primera Apelado Instancia, Sala Superior de
Smart Distributors, LLC. v. Luis Garraton, LLC.public domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IX SMART DISTRIBUTORS, Certiorari procedente LLC del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Recurrida Sala Superior de Bayamón V.
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI LUIS ARNALDO DUEŇO Certiorari VARGAS procedente del Tribunal de Recurrido Primera KLCE202400344 Instancia, Sala v.
Daiichi Sankyo Company v. Leepublic domain
REYNA, Circuit Judge. Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd. (“Daii-chi”) brought suit in the District Court for the District of Columbia challenging patent term adjustments made by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) for two Daiichi patents. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the government. Daiichi appeals from the entry of final judgment in the g
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Iancupublic domain
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge I. Introduction Nippon Shinyaku Company, Limited ("Nippon") owns United States Patent Nos. 7,205,302 and 7,494,997 (respectively, " '302 patent" and " '997 patent"). The United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") issued the '302 patent in 2007 with a patent term adjustment ("PTA") of 344 days, and the '997 patent in 2009 with a PTA of ninety-n
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Saint Mary Investments, LLC Peticionaria 2026 TSPR 35 v. 218 DPR ___ Wilfredo Denton Morales y otros Parte Recurrida Número del Caso: CC-2025-0181 Fecha: 9 de abril de 2026 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Panel IV Representantes legales de la parte peticionaria: Lcdo. Luis Enrique Ro
Titus v. Illinois Department of Transportationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. Darrell W. Titus (“Plaintiff’) brings this pro se action against the Illinois Depart*962ment of Transportation (“IDOT”), and IDOT employees Bob Duda, Diane M. O’Keefe, Christi G. Means, and Giovanni Fulgenzi (“IDOT Employees”), (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant
Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. v. Kappospublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NIPPON SHINYAKU COMPANY, LIMITED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 10-1142 ) ANDREI IANCU, 1 Under Secretary of ) Commerce for Intellect
Amador, Carmen v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Incpublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III ESPECIAL CARMEN AMADOR Apelación procedente del Apelante Tribunal de Primera v. KLAN202400663 Instancia, Sala