Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wagner v. Harris County, Texas”
Harris County Flood Control District v. Kerrpublic domain
JUSTICE DEVINE delivered a dissenting opinion, in which CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE GREEN, and JUSTICE BOYD joined. This inverse condemnation case concerns whether homeowners raised a fact *814question as to the elements of a taking. The homeowners blame their county and flood control district for approving new development without mitigating resulting
Kerr v. Harris Countypublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 292 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 293 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING Edward A. and Norma Kerr, together with approximately
The City of Mesquite, Texas v. Anthony Wagnerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0562 ══════════ The City of Mesquite, Texas, Petitioner, v. Anthony Wagner, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Di
Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM
The City of Mesquite, Texas v. Anthony Wagnerpublic domain
AFFIRM and Opinion Filed May 12, 2023 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00826-CV THE CITY OF MESQUITE, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY WAGNER, Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court
Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Sheppardpublic domain
One observer has estimated that 85 percent of the 27,000 wells drilled in the East Texas oil field in the first half of the 20th century were unnecessary — resulting in a huge waste of money and natural resources.1 As one means of reducing excessive *Page 421 drilling, the Texas Legislature provided for voluntary pooling in 1949, 2 and compulsory
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed September 1, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00122-CV BRYAN C. WAGNER AND DUER WAGNER III, Appellants V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial
Motion to Correct Judgment Granted; Opinion of September 1, 2022 Withdrawn; Reversed and Rendered and Substitute Opinion filed November 8, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00122-CV BRYAN C. WAGNER AND DUER WAGNER III, Appellants V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 189th District Cour
Bryan C. Wagner, Wagner Oil Company, Trade Exploration Corporation, and Wagner & Cochran, Inc. v. Apache Corporationpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 19-0243 ══════════ BRYAN C. WAGNER, WAGNER OIL COMPANY, TRADE EXPLORATION CORPORATION, AND WAGNER & COCHRAN, INC., PETITIONERS, V. APACHE CORPORATION, RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF
Apache Corporation v. Bryan C. Wagner, Wagner Oil Company, Trade Exploration Corporation, and Wagner & Cochran, Inc.public domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00132-CV No. 02-18-00135-CV ___________________________ APACHE CORPORATION, Appellant V. BRYAN C. WAGNER, WAGNER OIL COMPANY, TRADE EXPLORATION CORPORATION, AND WAGNER & COCHRAN, INC., Appelle
Trade Exploration Corp., Bryan C. Wagner and Duer Wagner III v. Exxon Mobil Corporationpublic domain
Motion Granted and Order filed March 23, 2021 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-21-00122-CV ____________ TRADE EXPLORATION CORP., BRYAN C. WAGNER AND DUER WAGNER III, Appellants/Cross-Appellees V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee/Cross-Appell
ACCEPTED 15-25-00087-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/29/2025 4:24 PM CASE NO. 15-25-00087-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 15-25-00087-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/28/2025 5:31 PM CASE NO. 15-25-00087-CV
Wagner v. Holtzapplepublic domain
MEMORANDUM MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. 1. BACKGROUND: This case presents a question about the constitutionality of a search and seizure in a college dormitory environment. The primary issue presented cannot be decided by the Court at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings, and, consequently, several of the claims will proceed to discovery. II. DISCUSSI
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Trade Exploration Corp., Bryan C. Wagner, and Duer Wagner, IIIpublic domain
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 8, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00091-CV EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellant V. TRADE EXPLORATION CORP., BRYAN C. WAGNER, AND DUER WAGNER, III, Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris Count
Opinion issued December 14, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00774-CV ——————————— IN RE PATTI J. WAGNER, AS GUARDIAN OF JENNY WAGNER, AN INCAPACITATED ADULT, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Trade Exploration Corp., Bryan C. Wagner, and Duer Wagner, IIIpublic domain
Order filed, March 4, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-19-00091-CV ____________ EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellant V. TRADE EXPLORATION CORP., BRYAN C. WAGNER, AND DUER WAGNER, III, Appellee On Appeal
Harris v. Bornepublic domain
The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss asserting that the appellant did not timely perfect her appeal. They contend that the appellant did not file a motion for extension to file the affidavit of inability to pay costs with this Court. For this Court to grant an extension to perfect an appeal, the appellant must file the instrument required to perfect appeal and the motion for extension of time no later than 15 days after the last date for filing the instrument. Ludwi
Opinion issued December 14, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00774-CV ——————————— IN RE PATTI J. WAGNER, AS GUARDIAN OF JENNY WAGNER, AN INCAPACITATED ADULT, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition fo
Wagner v. Swartspublic domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER GARY L. SHARPE, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Michael Wagner, Levi Ingersoll, Ken Fenwick and Sidney Apaugh commenced this action against defendants,1 asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 for violations of their constitutional rights in conjunction with defendants’ implementat