Cases

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied [see 23 NY3d 905 (2014)].

Following an investigation in which information was received from a confidential source, correction officials discovered that a letter intercepted in the mail room had been placed in the mail by petitioner. The letter contained gang-related materials, as well as an altered state-issued razor blade. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing gang-related materials, altering state property and violating facility corresponden

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Following an investigation in which information was received from a confidential source, correction officials discovered that a letter intercepted in the mail room had been placed in the mail by petitioner. The letter contained gang-related materials, as well as an altered state-issued razor blade. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing gang-related materials, altering state property and violating facility corresponden

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.], entered February 8, 2013) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules. It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed w

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. A male correction officer observed petitioner staring at a female correction counselor’s behind in a sexual manner. The officer called out to petitioner and, when petitioner did not respond, the offi

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.], entered February 8, 2013) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules. It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed w

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Before conducting a pat frisk on petitioner, a correction officer asked him if he had any contraband on him. After petitioner denied having any contraband, the officer found a broken piece of a mir

Appeal from a *1002judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered March 5, 2012 in St. Lawrence County, which denied petitioner’s application for an order to show cause to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding. Petitioner, an inmate currently serving an aggregate prison term of 19V2 to 39 years in prison (see People ex rel. Walker v Yelich, 71 AD3d 1348 [2010]), f

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. A male correction officer observed petitioner staring at a female correction counselor’s behind in a sexual manner. The officer called out to petitioner and, when petitioner did not respond, the offi

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Before conducting a pat frisk on petitioner, a correction officer asked him if he had any contraband on him. After petitioner denied having any contraband, the officer found a broken piece of a mir

Appeal from a *1002judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered March 5, 2012 in St. Lawrence County, which denied petitioner’s application for an order to show cause to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding. Petitioner, an inmate currently serving an aggregate prison term of 19V2 to 39 years in prison (see People ex rel. Walker v Yelich, 71 AD3d 1348 [2010]), f

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating various disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that th

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating various disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that th

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of -violating facility correspondence procedures. That determination was upheld on administrative appeal after which petitioner commence

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered May 15, 2009 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. While walking past petitioner’s cell on August 17, 2008, a correction officer observed petitioner holding a note indicating that he woul

14 N.Y.3d 912 (2010) In the Matter of TYRONE WALKER, Appellant, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent. Motion No: 2010-449. Court of Appeals of New York. Submitted April 19, 2010. Decided June 8, 2010. On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional quest

266 P.3d 178 (2011) 246 Or. App. 589 Betty A. FISCHER, trustee of the Betty A. Fischer Revocable Living Trust u/t/d 6/23/92 and trustee of the Gerald R. Fischer Revocable Living Trust u/t/d 6/23/92, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derek T. WALKER and Cassondra A. Walker, Defendants-Respondents. Derek T. Walker, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. David E. Sweo and Suzanne J. Sweo, Third-Party Defendants. CV

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 891 TP 13-00295 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF LAMONT WALKER, PETITIONER, V ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. LAMONT WALKER, PETITIONER PRO SE. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (P

ORDER This case came before the Court on May 12, 2005, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda of the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Therefore, we proceed to decide this appeal at this time. The defendant, Jason E. Walker, appeals pro se from a Family Cou