Cases

925 F.Supp. 124 (1995) Tyrone WALKER and Walter Diaz, Plaintiffs, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, Defendants. No. 3:95-CV-954. United States District Court, N.D. New York. December 14, 1995. *125 Hinman, Howard, Kattell, Binghamton, New York (Albert J. Millus, of counsel), Ruhnke & Barret, West Orange, N

895 F.Supp. 31 (1995) Cecilio EASTMAN, Plaintiff, v. Hans WALKER, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility; Edward Dann, Deputy Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility; and G. Richards, Correctional Lieutenant at Auburn Correctional Facility, et al., In Their Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants. No. 92-CV-812. United States District Court, N.D. New York. J

401 Mich. 419 (1977) 258 N.W.2d 414 McAVOY v. H B SHERMAN COMPANY STRICKLIN v. AMERICAN CHAIN & CABLE COMPANY, INC TURNER v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION MICHIGAN SELF-INSURERS' ASSOCIATION v. BUREAU OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION Docket Nos. 58845, 58846, 58983, 58855. (Calendar Nos. 4-7). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argu

MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER McAVOY, CMef Judge. Defendant Tony Walker now moves for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 83, or, in the alternative, for judgments of acquittal pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(e), regarding his convictions on Count One (Continuing Criminal Enterprise (“CCE”) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848(a) & (c)), Count Four (Narcotics Conspiracy in violation 21 U.S.C.

910 F.Supp. 837 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Tyrone WALKER, Walter Diaz, Anthony Walker aka Tony Walker. No. 3-94-CR-328. United States District Court, N.D. New York. September 26, 1995. *838 *839 *840 U.S. Attorney (Miroslav Lovric, Bernard J. Malone

MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER McAVOY, Chief Judge. Tyrone Walker and Tony Walker have moved to dismiss the Count One CCE charges against them on the ground that the government has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the fourth essential element of engaging in a Continuing Criminal Enterprise — they claim that the proof will not support a rational jury’s conclusion that

912 F.Supp. 646 (1996) UNITED STATES v. Tyrone WALKER, Walter Diaz, and Anthony "Tony" Walker, Defendants. No. 94-CR-328. United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 2, 1996. *647 *648 *649 United States Attorney, Binghamton, NY, Miroslav Lovric, B

910 F.Supp. 861 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Tyrone WALKER, Walter Diaz and Anthony Walker aka Tony Walker. No. 3-94-CR-328-ALL. United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 28, 1995. *862 United States Attorney, Binghamton, NY, for Government; Miroslav Lovric and Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., of couns

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...272 II. BACKGROUND...274 *272III. LEGAL STANDARDS...274 A. Motions in Limine...274 B. Expert Testimony...275 IV. DISCUSSION...277 A. Plai

18-3729-cr United States v. Walker 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2019 6 7 (Argued: January 9, 2020 Decided: July 14, 2020) 8 9 Docket No. 18-3729 10 11 ____________________ 12 13 UNITED STATES O

483 F.Supp.2d 128 (2007) Donovan WALKER, Petitioner, v. Louis RUSSO, Superintendent, and Martha Coakley, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,[1] Respondents. Civil Action No. 06-11476-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 18, 2007. *129 *130 Ev

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge: Defendants Tyrone Walker, Walter Diaz, and Anthony Walker appeal from judgments entered against them in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, (McAvoy, C.J.), following a jury trial, convicting them of multiple crimes arising from their participation in narcotics trafficking. Due to an erro

PER CURIAM. The order appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, on the ground that no copy of the proposed reply was served with the motion papers (Schumpp v. Interurban St. R. Co, 81 App. Div. 576, 81 N. Y. Supp. 366), with leave to the plaintiff, upon payment of such costs, to renew the motion on proper papers.

HENLEY, District Judge. On motion of third-party defendant to dismiss third-party complaint, which motion has been submitted upon depositions and written briefs. This is a personal injury suit filed originally in this Court by Ralph McAvoy, a citizen of Arkansas, against three foreign corporate defendants, including Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, hereinafter called “Texas Eastern,” to recover for

McAvoy, J. This matter is submitted to the court on an agreed statement of facts for a decision of a controversy between the parties. In April, 1909, the plaintiff leased to the defendants premises known as Nos. 8 and 10 West Thirty-sixth street, Manhattan, for a term of four years and eleven months beginning November 1, 1909. There was a privilege of renewal in this lease, and under such right the defendants renewed the lease for

Dearington, J. The plaintiff, on behalf of himself .and his minor son, Michael Walker, hereinafter referred to as Michael, brought this action against the defendants, parents of Sharon Kelly, their minor daughter. The plaintiff alleges that Sharon wilfully and maliciously assaulted Michael, causing a laceration over his right eye. The defendants in their answer deny the alleged assault and in a special defense allege that Sharon

Plaintiff Arthur T. Karr, on February 13, 1923, purchased, under an executory contract, a twenty-five acre pear orchard in the Yakima valley, together with certain farm equipment. Title to the land and equipment was acquired by defendant W.G. McAvoy in October, 1923, subject to plaintiff's contract, *Page 635 which was also assigned to defendant. The purchase price of the property was $36,790. Of this sum, $9,500 was paid in cash, an outstanding mortgage

Opinion by Mr. Justice Kephart, Plaintiff’s statement charges defendants with operating a car at an “excessive, illegal and improper rate of speed,” and with “negligently and recklessly operating it without due regard for the safety of pedestrians and without being under due control.” The evidence does not sustain these charges, and, to affirm appellee’s case, we must hold that a mere collision between an

McAvoy, J. The vessel involved was damaged as a result of a marine peril and defendants, her assurers, contest payment of the estimated damages found upon a survey because of this clause in the marine policy: “ No claims for loss or damage shall go beyond the extent or cost of actual repairs rendered necessary in consequence of any disaster insured against.” If this be construed as a clause conditioning liability upon t

HILL, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the failure of the United, States District Court for the District of Utah to vacate a restraining order entered against the conduct of a sheriff's sale ordered by a Utah state court. The United States had secured a judgment in a Utah state court on February 11, 1971, against the Colombine Coal Company. The suit was a foreclosure action based on Colombine’s de