Cases

5 So.3d 746 (2009) Allen F. STEWART, Appellant, v. Jennifer S. WALKER, Appellee. No. 4D08-838. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 25, 2009. *747 Allen F. Stewart, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. Jennifer Walker, Taunton, MA, pro se. TAYLOR, J. Allen Stewart, the biological father of Tyler

981 So.2d 1219 (2008) STEWART v. WALKER. No. 4D08-491. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 11, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-73,419-03 AND WR-73,419-04 EX PARTE CHARLES STEWART WALKER, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 636861-A AND 636861-B IN THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. YEARY , J., filed a concurring opinion in which SLAUGHTER , J., joined. NEWELL, J., concurred.

In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ══════════ Nos. WR-73,419-03 & WR-73,419-04 ══════════ EX PARTE CHARLES STEWART WALKER, Applicant ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus Cause Nos. 636861-A and 636861-B in the 174th District Court From Harris County ════════════════════════════════════

597 N.E.2d 368 (1992) Beve STEWART, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. James A. WALKER, Hawkeye Security, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Appellees-Defendants. No. 43A05-9109-CV-299. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fifth District. August 19, 1992. Rehearing Denied October 16, 1992. *369 Robert W. Miller, Miller & Miller,

APPEAL ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

A. Correct. (ECF No. 1758 at 50 ). Dr. Hinton was also asked about the dangers the lack of appropriate staffing can have on an individual who is taking psychotropic medicine. His testimony went as follows: Q. And you've heard all the ills that can come if somebody is on psychotropic medicine and it's not being monitored, right? A. Correct.

201 F.Supp.2d 291 (2002) Elaine STEWART, Plaintiff, v. PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, LLP, Defendant. No. 02 Civ. 0911(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 20, 2002. Joseph A. Turco, Spar & Bernstein, P.C., for Plaintiff. Patrick W. Shea, Zachary R. Osborne, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, for Defendant.

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK E. WALKER, District Judge. Before this Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 84, 86. This Court has already resolved some of the issues addressed in these motions and responses thereto, see ECF No. Ill, but other issues in the cross-motions are unresolved. In particular, Plaintiffs’ substantive due proces

*Supp. 40Opinion RICCIARDULLI, J.— INTRODUCTION Defendant Michael Kerr Walker pled no contest to contracting without a state contractor’s license (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7028, subd. (a)), and a hearing was conducted to determine the amount of restitution defendant would be ordered to pay to the homeowner with whom he cont

Judge Rosemary Ledet |!This is a direct stockholder class action. From the trial court’s October 31, 2016 judgment granting certain defendants’ motions for summary judgment, the plaintiffs appeal. Because the trial court’s judgment lacks the required decretal language for a final judgment, we dismiss the plaintiffs’ appeal without prejudice and remand. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

314 S.W.3d 242 (2010) Robin PEARSON, Appellant, v. Charles STEWART, Appellee. No. 2-09-123-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. May 6, 2010. *244 Rodney R. Elkins, Dallas, TX, for Appellant. Shannon M. Estrada, Greenville, TX, for Appellee. PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ. OPINI

WILLIAMS, J. _[xjhe plaintiffs, Milton Lee and Mary Lee, on behalf of Sheila Lee, appeal the trial court’s award of damages. The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“JNOV”) and awarded plaintiffs the amount of $17,000 in general damages. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On July 27, 2009, Carolyn Martin was involved in a traffi

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 In this products liability case, we consider whether the trial court erred when it gave a jury instruction that allowed the jury to apply either the consumer expectation test or the risk-benefit test to determine whether a driver’s- car seat was unreasonably danger

OPINION JANE BLAND, Justice. In this real estate dispute, IQ Holdings, Inc. sued its title insurer and its escrow agent to recover damages it sustained in connection with the sale of a condominium unit. During pre-trial discovery, IQ also sought a spoliation-of-evidence finding and sanctions against both defendants. The trial court denied IQ’s motions for s

GUIDRY, J. |sRhodia Inc. (Rhodia), The Elliott Company (Elliott),1 and Entergy Corporation (Entergy) appeal a class certification judgment in these consolidated suits arising from a chemical release at Rhodia’s Baton Rouge plant. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 22, 1999, t

552 F.3d 26 (2009) William M. STEWART, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1386. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted August 28, 2008. Decided January 7, 2009. *27 Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attor

VOIGT, Justice. [T1] The appellant, Daniel Brian Walker, was convicted of felony stalking as a result of an encounter with his ex-wife in violation of a permanent order of protection. Conviction for stalking requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant "engage[d] in a course of conduct reasonably likely to harass." Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-506(b) (Lexis-Nexis 2011). At trial, the jury was given conflicting and

PER CURIAM: Cedric Demon Stewart appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Bland, No. 2:07-cv-00512-RAJ-JEB (E.D.Va. Dec. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio

PEATROSS, J. hln this tort suit, Plaintiffs, Charlotte Amos and Norman Artez Amos, individually and on behalf of Charlita Thomas (collectively referred to as “Ms. Amos”), brought suit against Officer Kristopher L. Walker and the Town of Jonesboro (collectively referred to as “Officer Walker”), alleging damages sustained as a result of an automobile collision occurring on August 24, 2003. Ms. Amos alleged that the accident wa