Cases

36 A.3d 399 (2012) 424 Md. 333 Michael T. POLEK, et ux. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al. Richard S. Dinnis, et ux. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. John W. Kinsey, Jr., et ux. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. Frank J. Schultz, Jr. v. Citimortgage, Inc. Elizabeth A. Moore, et vir. v. Residential Funding Company LLC, et al. Nos. 24, Se

GURICH, J., with whom WINCHESTER, J. joins concurring in part and dissenting in part: ¶ 1 The Petition in this case was filed in the name of Chase Home Finance Milwaukee. Although, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Petition, the name of the Plaintiff was not amended. The Final Journal Entry of Judgment inexplicably grants judgment to JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, suc

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants'1 Motion for Summary Judgment *763(Def. Mot. S.J., ECF No. 113; ECF No. 82) in this consolidated action.2 In turn, Plaintiffs have filed a Memorandum of Law in Opposition (

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN Z. LEE, District Judge. This wrongful termination case was brought by Plaintiffs Dori Dugas-Filippi and Robert Filippi (“Plaintiffs”) over Du-gas-Filippi’s termination from her position as an executive assistant at Defendant JP Morgan Chase & Co. (“Defendant”). At a settlement conference between the parties, a dispute arose as to whether Dugas-Filip-pi could b

WETTICK JR., J, OPINION AND ORDERS OF COURT /. BACKGROUND Defendants’ preliminary objections seeking dismissal of plaintiff’s amended complaint are the subject of this opinion and order of court. In this litigation at GD09-016892, plaintiff purchased eight mortgage-backed security certificates issued by five separate trusts between May 2006 and December 2007. The

273 P.3d 62 (2012) 2012 OK 24 J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor by Merger to Chase Home Finance LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. David S. ELDRIDGE, Mary K. Eldridge, Defendants/Appellants, John Doe, Jane Doe, Railend LLC, Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO William Travis Pointon Ira, Northwood Lake Estates Homeowners Association, Inc., Douglas Shelton, Defendants. No. 109,900.

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 48] JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Patricia McNeary-Calloway, Colin MacKinnon, Terrie McKinnon, Andrea North, and Sheila M. Mayko (collectively “Plaintiffs”) initiated this putative class action on June 20, 2011, challenging Defendants JPMorgan Chase, N.A. and C

OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge. This is a wrongful foreclosure action. It is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 87]. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 87] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Background This is an unusual foreclosur

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM H. BARBOUR, JR., District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Motions of Plaintiff to Remand. Having considered the pleadings, the attachments thereto, as well as supporting and opposing authorities, the Court finds the Motions are not well taken and should be denied. I. Factual Background and Procedural History In June of

OPINION OF THE COURT Eileen Bransten, J. In this action, plaintiffs Andy Miller and ASM Sports (ASM) bring tortious interference, unjust enrichment, unfair competí*419tion, and prima facie tort claims against rival sports management firms and their principals, stemming from defendants’ purported “theft” of plaintiffs’ client, Larry Sanders.

456 B.R. 791 (2011) In re The ANTIOCH COMPANY, et al., Debtor. The Antioch Company Litigation Trust, W. Timothy Miller, Trustee, Plaintiff v. Lee Morgan et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 08-35741, 08-35742, 08-35743, 08-35744, 08-35745, 08-35746, 08-35747. Adversary No. 09-3409. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. April 28, 2011.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: Plaintiff Benjamin Messinger, through counsel, brought this diversity action against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), alleging that Chase discriminated against him based on his age and retaliated against him for complaining of age discrimination, in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”), N.Y. Exec

Filed 1/4/16 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX DOUGLAS J. CRAWFORD, 2d Civil No. B257412 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2012-426563- Plaintiff and Appellant,

Opinion GILBERT, P. J. The practice of law can be abundantly rewarding, but also stressful. The absence of civility displayed by some practitioners heightens stress and debases the legal profession. Those attorneys who allow their personal animosity for an opposing counsel or an opposing party to infect a case damage their reputations and blemish the digni

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from state court and alleging wrongful foreclosure, are Defendant Chase Home Finance LLC’s (“CHF’s”) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, or alternatively, motion for more definite statement (instrument # 4) and Plaintiffs Lawrence Motten and Donna Evans’ request for leav

363 S.W.3d 479 (2012) DISCOVER BANK v. Joy A. MORGAN. No. E2009-01337-SC-R11-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. August 31, 2011 Session. March 27, 2012. *483 Ronald S. Range, Jr., Johnson City, Tennessee, and Gary C. Shockley, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Discover Bank. Jennifer L. C

730 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2010) Deanna WALTERS, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY MORTGAGE OF CALIFORNIA, Inc.; Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp; James York; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC; HSBC Bank U.S.A., N.A.; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. Civ. No. S-09-3317 FCD/KJM. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 4, 2010. *1190

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHERYL BARRER; WALTER BARRER,  on behalf of themselves and those No. 07-35414 similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants,  CV-06-00415- v. HA/HU CHASE BANK USA, N.A., OPINION Defendant-Appellee.

Rel: March 10, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM,