⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Wanna Christina Davis”

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-01-13 · Published · cited 2× · 152 F. Supp. 3d 403; 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 209; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4012; 2015 WL 171805
MEMORANDUM McHUGH, District Judge. This case tests the outer bounds of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the context of workplace violence. I am confronted with two competing but equally valid public policy interests — the need for a safe workplace, as weighed against the need to accommodate and treat mental illness. Ruling in favor of the Defendant employer here could discourage employees
Blocker v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023-06-21 · Published · cited 25× · 889 S.E.2d 824; 316 Ga. 568
316 Ga. 568 FINAL COPY S23A0032. BLOCKER v. THE STATE. COLVIN, Justice. Appellant Phillip Blocker appeals his convictions for malice murder, participation in criminal street gang activity, and related offenses in connection with the shooting death of Eric Leon Smith.1 1 The crimes occurred on April 18, 2010, and Smith died the next day. In July 2010, a Fulton County grand jury jointly charged Appellant, Chanel Burse, Ralph Gist, Jamainayh Jackson, Qw
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
08/25/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 9, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN M. BANKS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC17-CR-925 William R. Goodman, III, Judge ___________________________________
People v. Mendozapublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2016-02-11 · Published · cited 139× · 62 Cal. 4th 856; 365 P.3d 297; 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 445; 2016 Cal. LEXIS 950
Opinion CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J. A jury found defendant Huber Joel Mendoza guilty of the first degree premeditated murders of Alicia Martinez, Carlos Lopez, and Carmillo (Camarino) Chavez (Pen. Code, § 187), 1 and found multiple-murder special-circumstance allegations to be true (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(3)),
In re Amias I.public domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 343 Conn. 816
IN RE AMIAS I. ET AL.* (SC 20671) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus The respondent mother appealed from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor children, N, M, and D. The petitioner, the Commissioner of Children and Families, filed petitions to terminate the respondent
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 207 F. Supp. 3d 626; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125372; 2016 WL 4944012
MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael F. Urbanski, United States District Judge On December 22, 2015, a jury found defendants Felix Adriano Chujoy and Carolyn J. Edlind guilty of conspiracy to engage in witness tampering under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Count One), witness tampering under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(1) (Count Two), and obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (Count Three). The jury also found Edlind guilty
People v. Nelsonpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2011-01-20 · Published · cited 389× · 51 Cal. 4th 198; 246 P.3d 301; 120 Cal. Rptr. 3d 406; 2011 Cal. LEXIS 463
51 Cal.4th 198 (2011) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BERNARD ALBERT NELSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. S085193. Supreme Court of California. January 20, 2011. *202 Glen Nierny, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief As
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
FILED FEBRUARY 22, 2024 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE In the Matter of
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 15× · 506 S.W.3d 717; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 13553; 2016 WL 7384172
OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice In this, interlocutory appeal, the State seeks to overturn the trial court’s pretrial order suppressing thirty-seven-statements made during recorded telephone conversations between a prison inmate and his friends and family members while the inmate’s post-conviction writ of habeas corpus attacking his capital murder conv
Leija, Antonio Jr.public domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-03-04 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0241-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/4/2015 4:20:51 PM PD-0241-15 Accepted 3/4/2015 6:29:05 PM MARCH 5, 2015 C
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008-11-13 · Published · cited 46× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 332; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96468
586 F.Supp.2d 332 (2008) DAWN L. and Michael L., on their own behalf and on behalf of their daughter ML, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. GREATER JOHNSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:06-19. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. November 13, 2008. *338 Edward A. Olds, Richard S. Matesic, Pittsburgh, PA, for P
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri