Cases

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher Love Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reas

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Smith, a/k/a Bar None Royal Blackness, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing two Defendants because the Defendants were not state actors and granting summary judgme

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reaso

578 F.3d 246 (2009) Kevin SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None Royal Blackness, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon OZMINT; Gary D. Maynard; Robert Ward; Gary A. Boyd; Gene Noles; James Sligh; Debra Wise; Alvin Graber; Lester Hinson, Jr.; Ms. Hill, OFC; Doris Curenton; Mary Stewart; Dean Day; Marcia Fuller; T.W. Thomas; Laurie Bessinger; Bernard McKie; Associate Warden Stevenson; Samuel Latta; James Christensen; Willie Mason; Harold Scott; Sergeant Shivers; E. Jennings

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shaun Wayne Wiles appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Smith, a/k/a Bar None Royal Blackness, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing two Defendants because the Defendants were not state actors and granting summary judgme

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher Love Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reas

PER CURIAM: James Strong seeks to appeal the district court’s order entered September 29, 2005, granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). Defendants seek to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part their motion for reconsideration, and its amended order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summa

PER CURIAM: Christopher Love Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant American Amenities, Inc.; claims against other Defendants remain pending in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD concurred. Judge DAVIS wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: These claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 raise the issue whether certain actions taken by South Carolina prison officials after an inmate’s suspected re

511 F.3d 420 (2007) Joseph M.L. GARDNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jon OZMINT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 06-28. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: September 27, 2007. Decided: December 19, 2007. *421 *422

444 F.Supp.2d 502 (2006) Kevin SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None Royal Blackness # 164920 Plaintiff, v. Jon OZMINT, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, et. al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 04-1819. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. March 31, 2006. Kevin Smith, Columbia, SC, pro se. Matthew B. Rosbrugh, William Henry Da

SHORT, J. Ammie McNeil appeals from the trial court’s order granting the South Carolina Department of Corrections’ (SCDC) mo*189tion to dismiss her claims for due process violations, public policy discharge, and defamation. We affirm. FACTS SCDC employed McNeil at Kirkland Reception and Evaluation Center (Kirkland) as a captain. S

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clavon D. Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Habeeb Abdul Malik appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Curtis Q. Owens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning tha

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Richard E. Blackburn appeals the district court’s order adopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blackburn’s motion for appointmen

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Albert D. Page seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying, inter alia, Page’s motions for orders granting him leave to depose correctional officers and prison inmates and compelling the

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Albert D. Page seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying, inter alia, Page’s motions for orders granting him leave to depose correctional officers and prison inmates and compelling the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Isiah James, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and the court’s order denying his post-judgment motions to alter or amend the judgment under Fed.R.Ci