Cases

219 Kan. 668 (1976) 549 P.2d 986 WARD E. KING, Appellant, v. LORAINE E. WENGER, LORENE E. RALSTON, DONALD VANDOVER and DOTTIE VANDOVER, and RAYMOND J. HARRISON and MELVA J. HARRISON, Appellees. No. 47,967 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed May 8, 1976. Howard A. Spies, of Schroeder, Heeney, Groff & Spies, of Topeka, argued the

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 16-P-817 Appeals Court JAMES DEVER vs

159 P.3d 215 (2007) ANTRIM, PIPER, WENGER, INC., Appellee, v. David W. LOWE and Deborah Lowe, Appellants. No. 97,308. Court of Appeals of Kansas. June 8, 2007. *218 Richard D. Loffswold, Jr., of Girard, for appellants. Vernon L. Jarboe and Martha A. Peterson, of Sloan, Eisenbarth, Glassman, McEntire & Jarboe, L.L.C., o

STATON, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent to the majority's treatment of Issue I. While I agree that Trial Rule 32(D)(8)(a) controls this issue, I believe that the majority's interpretation of *1347the rule is in error. Therefore, I would reverse and grant a new trial. Initially, the majority fundamentally misconceives th

PER CURIAM: Walter Wenger, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., Judge) granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in this suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400, et seq., Section 604 of the Rehabilitation A

Appellee owned the Biloxi Golf Course, including the club house thereon. Appellant R.B. Wenger began this proceeding in the county court of Harrison county under section 2262, Code of 1930, to enforce a lien against *Page 316 the golf course and club house owned by appellee for labor and materials furnished by him for their repair and improvement. Six others claimed liens of the same character on the property; they were named by appellant in his petition,

OPINION FABE, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Ruth Ward was admitted to Fairbanks Memorial Hospital for the birth of her fourth child. She was treated under the care of her *1033personal obstetrician and Ms associates, none of whom was a hospital employee. At their direction, Ward received blood transfusions at

SOMMERYILLE, J. In the interdiction proceeding against Prances Anderson Wenger the undercurator, Silas Gillen, Jr., instituted an action against Mrs. Julia Ann McArthur, the curatrix, praying for her removal. [1] This ordinary action, like unto one for deprivation of the tutorship, was properly commenced by petition and citation, and should have been conducted in the usual form. C. C

Millee, Judge: John Wenger, the appellant, presented to the Judge of the circuit court of Randolph County, Ms bill in chancery, against the appellees, Charles Fisher, Jacob Helmiek, and J. W. Goddin, Omar Conrad and Patrick Crickard, as commissioners, composing the county court of said county; and the county court of Randolph County, a corporation, praying that said Fisher and Helmiek, their agents, employees, and all other pe

The opinion of the court was delivered, July 3d 1867, by Agnew, J. — We think that the effect of the charge was to mislead the jury on the vital point of the case. Taken singly, perhaps no part of the charge can be said to be clearly erroneous. The judge very correctly stated that it was a question of delivery by Wenger at New Berlin, and that after delivery there, he had no right of stoppage in transitu. <

POLITZ, Circuit Judge: Appellants Thomas Meacham, Joseph Ward, Edward William Gilroy, Bobby Gene Hayes and Donald L. Metsger, along with three others, were indicted on three counts of violating laws relating to controlled substances. Count One charged that the eight had attempted in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 to possess marijuana with intent to distribute. Count Two charged th

Weaver, J. In the year 1858, •William G. Meredith and Joseph B. Meredith, brothers, obtained title as tenants in common to 330 acres o.f land in Taylor County of this state. About the time of this purchase, they took possession of the land, but made their several homes and improvements upon different 80-acre tracts. William brought with him a wife and child, and Joseph soon married Naamah G. Ward, daughter of Jabez B. Ward. In 186

KELLY, Judge. This lawsuit originated as part of a class action against the appellees, ,R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Lorillard Tobacco *1140 Company, 1 and other tobacco companies seeking damages for diseases caused by smoking ciga

964 A.2d 878 (2009) ALLEGHENY INSPECTION SERVICE, INC. and Steel City Inspection Agency, Inc., Appellees v. NORTH UNION TOWNSHIP and K2 Engineering, Inc., Appellants. Allied Building Inspections, v. Township of Millcreek and Building Inspection Underwriters of Pennsylvania, Inc., v. Fairview Township and Harborcreek Township Appeal of Building Inspection Underwriters of Pennsylvania, Inc. Allied Building Inspections,

Kefaloukis v Mayer (2021 NY Slip Op 04601) Kefaloukis v Mayer 2021 NY Slip Op 04601 Decided on August 4, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

Wheeler v BrandSafway Indus., LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 03887) Wheeler v BrandSafway Indus., LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 03887 Decided on June 27, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Brennan, Circuit Judge. During an in-chambers conference among court and counsel, Curtis Johnson's attorney withdrew an objection to the restitution amount to be paid to the victims of his client's wire fraud. Johnson was not present. Then, in open court, Johnson confirmed he no longer disputed restitution, recognized the plea agreement included an appeal waiver, pleaded guilty, and was

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2350 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CURTIS L. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

102 F.3d 1112 65 USLW 2472, 97 CJ C.A.R. 4 JANE L., on behalf of herself and all others similarlysituated; Utah Women's Clinic, P.C.; Planned ParenthoodAssociation of Utah; David Hansen, M.D.; Madhuri Shah,M.D.; John Carey, M.D.; Dan Chichester, M.D.; KirtlyParker Jones, M.D.; Neil K. Kochenour, M.D.; Rhonda Lehr,M.D.; Claire Leonard, M.D.; Kenneth Ward, M.D.; BonnieJeanne Baty, M.D.;

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-1403 ROY MOSES, Appellant v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA; SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (District Court No. 2:21-cv-05466) District Judge: Honorable Joseph F. Leeson, Jr