Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1730 In re: SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED JUNE 13, 2019 ____________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at B

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1730 In re: SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED JUNE 13, 2019 ____________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at B

MEMORANDUM OPINION GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. On June 11, 2014, this Court was presented with an application for a search warrant pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2703(a), (b)(1)(A), and (c)(1)(A). The application sought a warrant to obtain emails and other information from a “Gmail” account, which is hosted by Google, Inc.

*1207MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HERMAN N. JOHNSON, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States served on, Google, Inc., a search warrant issued by the Court pursuant to the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. .§ 2703 et seq. Google challenged the warrant’s applicability to information stored in foreign territory, and pursuant to th

OPINION AND ORDER M. David Weisman, United States Magistrate Judge The government has presented an application for a search and seizure warrant to seize various items presumed to be located at a particularly identified location (hereinafter “subject premises”). The warrant further requests the authority to seize various items (identified in Attachment B of the warrant application), including various fo

*467 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. “The rise of an electronic medium that disregards geographical boundaries throws the law into disarray by creating entirely new phenomena that need to become the subject of clear legal rules but that cannot be governed, satisfactorily, by any current territoriall

UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before CAMPANELLA, SALUSSOLIA, and CELTNIEKS Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Warrant Officer One GRAHAM H. SMITH United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20160150 Headquart

HICKS, J. The State appeals an order of the Circuit Court ( Rappa , J.) denying an application for a search warrant. The trial court ruled that it lacked the authority to issue the search warrant because the application sought records held by AT&T, a foreign corporation. We reverse. I. Factual Background The

770 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2011) In the Matter of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S APPLICATION FOR A SEARCH WARRANT TO SEIZE AND SEARCH ELECTRONIC DEVICES FROM EDWARD CUNNIUS. No. 2:11-mj-00055-JPD-JLR. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. February 11, 2011. *1139 MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT'S APPLICATI

362 F.Supp.2d 1298 (2003) In Re: Search WARRANT No. 03-1130-01JGG. United States District Court, M.D. Florida. Orlando Division. December 16, 2003. *1299 Carmen Alpizar, Rywant, Alvarez, Jones, Russo & Guyton, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Carlos Diaz. David J. Stefany, Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Wehr Constructors,

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Angels of Care by TLM, LLC, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 390 C.D. 2023 : Department of Human Services, : Submitted: July 5, 2024 Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. This case implicates the Speech or Debate Clause of the United States Constitution.1 The Government obtained a search *521warrant to search the email account of Chaka Fattah, a United States Congressman. Fattah, along with the “Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ) COORDINATED. C.A. No. 6885-VCL PARTNERSHP LITIGATION ) THIS FILING APPLIES TO COODINATED CIVIL ACTIONS 6886 AND 6908 MEMORANDUM OPINION ADDRESSING CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT GOVERNING SALEM CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY Date Submitted: July 28, 2021 Date Decided: September 28, 2021 Carmella

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case is a post-foreclosure challenge to the foreclosure of a property owned by Michael and Chantel Aragao (the “Arag-aos”). The Aragaos assert a series of claims against Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), Merrimack Mortgage Company, Inc. (“Merri*

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”), filed a Motion for Attorney’s Fees which the Court referred to Magistrate Judge Alan Kay. See Order (Feb. 4, 2014), ECF No. [34], Magistrate Judge Kay submitted a Report and Recommendation to the Court, re

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corporation (“AES”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. # 140. AES ar*?gues that summary judgment is warranted because the patent at issue is invalid for indefiniteness. Id. Plaintif

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ) COORDINATED C.A. No. 6885-VCL PARTNERSHIP LITIGATION ) THIS FILING APPLIES TO COORDINATED CIVIL ACTIONS 6886 AND 6908 MEMORANDUM OPINION ADDRESSING CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY IN CONNECTION WITH FREEZE-OUT OF MINORITY PARTNERS IN SALEM CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY Date Submitted: January 11, 2022

OPINION Holly Kirby delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Gary R. Wade, and Jeffrey S. Bivins, JJ,, joined. Petitioner Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) brought this action to' set aside a tax sale of real property. MERS argues that t

MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge In early October of 2013, plaintiff Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) submitted a document request to defendant Department of Justice (“DOJ”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) seeking records regarding a national security program that involves the Unite

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE INFRINGEMENT JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge Plaintiff Largan and defendant Genius have filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of direct, contributory, and induced infringement. See Dkt. Nos. 214, 2151 The motions overlap substantially and focus on the issue of whether Genius’s conduct was sufficiently connected to the Un