Cases

485 F.Supp.2d 1206 (2007) OREGON-WASHINGTON CARPENTERS-EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST FUND, Plaintiff, v. BQC CONSTRUCTION, INC. HARDWARE SERVICE, Defendant. No. CV 06-1379-HU. United States District Court, D. Oregon. April 24, 2007. *1207 *1208 Bruce A. Rubin, Alyssa E. Tormala, Jennifer J. Roof, Mi

OPINION re POST-TRIAL MOTIONS of the COMMONWEALTH of PENNSYLVANIA and JOHNSON & JOHNSON DEFENDANTS OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND .1121 A. Opening.1121 B. Parties.1122 1. Plaintiff Agencies .1122 a. DPW/Pennsylvania Medicaid.1122 b.

36 A.3d 1112 (2011) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; Abbott Laboratories; AstraZeneca PLC; AstraZeneca, Holdings, Inc.; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; AstraZeneca LP; Bayer AG; Bayer Corporation; SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline; Pfizer, Inc.; Pharmacia Corporation; Johnson & Johnson; Alza Corporation; Centocor, Inc.; Ethicon, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.; McNeil

697 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2010) WESTERN WASHINGTON LABORERS-EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PANERA BREAD CO., et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:08CV00120 ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. March 16, 2010. *1086 David A. Rosenfeld, Mario Al

Hunt, J. ¶1 Dellen Wood Products Inc. appeals the superior court’s affirmance of the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals’ (Board) decision that Dellen defaulted on its obligations as a self-insured employer and thereby lost its right to its surety funds. Dellen’s first argument presents an issue of first impression: whether the superior court erred in construing “default” under the Industrial Insurance Act1

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0012p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CASSANDRA THOMPSON, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

*573 OPINION DIANE M. HENSON, Justice. HealthTronies, Inc. sued Lisa Laser USA, Inc. and Lisa Laser Products, OHG (collectively, “Lisa Laser”) for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract. After the trial court issued an order dismissing the suit base

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00530-CV HealthTronics, Inc., Appellant v.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, Athey and Callins Argued at Arlington, Virginia ATLANTIC KOREAN AMERICAN PRESBYTERY OPINION BY v. Record No. 1930-23-4 JUDGE CLIFFORD L. ATHEY, JR.

WILNER, Judge. This case arises from a consolidated settlement of several hundred asbestos-related personal injury and wrongful death actions. The issue before us is whether the dispute that emanated from the settlement agreement and that forms the basis of this lawsuit is subject to arbitration, and that, in turn, *333de

353 F.Supp.2d 1002 (2005) Deborah COOK, Plaintiff, v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. No. C04-3063-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. January 26, 2005. *1003 *1004 *1005 Blake Parker, Blake, Parker Law Office, Fort Do

THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-WC-01193-COA WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF APPELLANTS SUPERVISORS AND MS PUBLIC ENTITY WC TRUST v. JOHN SMITH APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/24/2019 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS’ APPEALED: COMP

442 B.R. 314 (2011) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-12229 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 7, 2011. *320 Mark D. Collins, Esquire, Chun I. Jang, Esquire, Lee E. Kaufman, Esquire, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Rafael X. Zahralddin-Aravena, Esquire, Neil R. Lapinski, Esquire, Shelley

156 P.3d 105 (2007) 211 Or. App. 485 EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, A MUTUAL COMPANY, a Wisconsin mutual company, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Respondent, v. TEKTRONIX, INC., an Oregon corporation, Defendant-Respondent Cross-Appellant, and Continental Casualty Company, an Illinois corporation; Travelers Indemnity Company, a Connecticut corporation; Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a Connecticut corporation; Granite Stat

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2140 Doc: 51 Filed: 08/05/2022 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2140 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CONSTELLIUM ROLLED PRODUCTS RAVENSWOOD, LLC,

702 F.Supp.2d 320 (2010) ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHINA NATIONAL METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 05-4376(GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 1, 2010. *325 Robert A. Magnanini, Esq., Stone and Magnanini, LLP, Richard E. Donovan, E

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D. The plaintiff David Kopin appeals from a summary judgment of the Law Division in favor of defendant Orange Products, Inc. that dismissed his action to recover damages on a theory of quantum meruit for business suggestions he made while employed by defendant. *359

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 36 This petition for a writ of mandamus arises from a number of actions in which *Page 37 1,675 plaintiffs, all individuals who claim that they were injured by exposure to isocyanate1 while employed as coal miners, have sued

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) C&E SERVICES, INC., and ) CARL L. BIGGS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 03-1857 (JMF) ) ASHLAND INC

311 B.R. 288 (2004) In re APACHE PRODUCTS COMPANY, Debtor. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-20896-8P1. Adversary No. 03-302. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 11, 2004. *289 Lori V. Vaughan, Mark J. Wol