Cases

*538SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs appellants Gerald K. Smith, litigation trustee of Farmland Dairies LLC Litigation Trust (“Farmland”), and Peter G. Pappas, plan administrator of the Plan of Liquidation of Parmalat-USA Corporation (“Parmalat USA”) (jointly, “plaintiffs”), appeal August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007 judgments of the District Court dismissing their suits against defend

*538SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs appellants Gerald K. Smith, litigation trustee of Farmland Dairies LLC Litigation Trust (“Farmland”), and Peter G. Pappas, plan administrator of the Plan of Liquidation of Parmalat-USA Corporation (“Parmalat USA”) (jointly, “plaintiffs”), appeal August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007 judgments of the District Court dismissing their suits against defend

911 A.2d 1230 (2006) Achilles PAPPAS et al., Appellants, v. EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, FSB, et al., Appellees. No. 05-CV-1062. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 25, 2006. Decided December 7, 2006. *1231 Daniel S. Roth, Washington, DC, with whom Kurt Berlin, was on the brief, for appellants.

Dooley, J. ¶ 1. These consolidated cases present disputes over child support so stale that the parties’ children are now in and approaching their thirties. The basic questions are whether father can register and enforce a child support order obtained in Oklahoma against mother and, inversely, whether mother can register and enforce an earlier child support order obtained in Georgia

829 A.2d 953 (2003) EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, FSB, Appellant, v. Achilles PAPPAS, Mary Pappas West, Christy Papageorge, Appellees. No. 02-CV-676. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 22, 2003. Decided August 14, 2003. *954 G. Vann Canada, Jr., Rockville, MD, for appellant. Daniel S. Roth, with w

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The American Bank and Trust Company, N.A. (the Bank) has moved to disqualify plaintiffs’ counsel, Ari Karen. [# 141]. Judge Lee has referred the motion here for resolution. [# 147]. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Rule 72(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Regr

OPINION HORN, Judge. Dennis J. Pappas, plaintiff, brings this action against the government seeking $10,000,000.00 in damages for allegedly breaching an agreement not to prosecute the plaintiff. The government has moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The facts, construed in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, Mr. Pappas, are as follows. FINDINGS

OPINION AND ORDER LEISURE, District Judge. For the reasons set forth below, the Intervening Defendants’ motion to quash trial subpoenas is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND The Court assumes familiarity with the facts and allegations as stated in the Court’s many prior decisions in this action. See Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. De

639 F.3d 572 (2011) PARMALAT CAPITAL FINANCE LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, Dr. Enrico Bondi, Extraordinary Commissioner of Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A., Parmalat S.p.A., and other affiliated entities, in Extraordinary Administration under the laws of Italy, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant, Capital & Finance Asset Management S.A., Cattolica Partecipazioni S.p.A., Hermes Focus Asset Management Europe Limited, Erste Sp

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Parmalat Capital Finance Limited (“PCFL”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.) entered on September 23, 2009 granting summary judgment on all claims to Defendants-Appellees Bank of America and related entities (collectively, “Bank of America”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural h

2023 IL App (4th) 220643 FILED July 14, 2023 NOS. 4-22-0643, 4-22-0645 cons. Carla Bender 4th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT Court, IL

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Jean Joseph appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated August 4, 2014, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against him, to strike his answer, and for an order of reference. Ordered t

JUDGMENT This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. R. 34(j). The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is ORDERED AND ADJUD

2022 IL App (1st) 192091 SIXTH DIVISION March 18, 2022 Nos. 1-19-2091, 1-20-0257, & 1-20-1191 (cons.) IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT OLD SECOND NATIONAL BAN

KING, Senior Judge: Appellant, Matthew Rogers (“Rogers”), appeals from the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to Advance Bank, appellee, on a complaint for breach of contract, judicial foreclosure, and/or judicial sale. Rogers argues that the court erred in granting the motion without first requiring that the parties participate in mediation pursuant to D.C.Code § 42-

690 F.Supp. 1465 (1988) E.F. HUTTON MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Harry G. PAPPAS, Jr., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. H-87-552. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 28, 1988. *1466 Howard R. Hawkins, Gregory M. Petrick, Grant B. Hering and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, New York City, and Phillips P. O'Shaughn

OPINION OF THE COURT Thomas F. Whelan, J. It is ordered that this motion (No. 001) by the plaintiff for, among other things, summary judgment, caption amendment and the appointment of a referee to compute, is granted in its entirety, and it is further ordered that the proposed order submitted by the plaintiff, as modified, is signed simultaneously herewith. This foreclosure action was comm

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge This tort action, seeking over $10 million, is the tenth lawsuit filed in a dispute between the plaintiff and one or more of the four defendants (or their relatives) over a townhouse in Southeast Washington, D.C., that has been ongoing for more than a decade. The plaintiff alleges

8 A.3d 1239 (2010) Matt BANKS, Appellant, v. EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, Appellee. Nos. 08-CV-16, 08-CV-1281, 09-CV-427, 09-CV-428. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 19, 2010. Decided December 2, 2010. *1240 Aaron G. Sokolow, with whom Morris R. Battino, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appell

Columbus Life Ins. Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2021 NCBC 52. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF PITT 21 CVS 0052 COLUMBUS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS WELLS FARGO B