Cases

FILED October 1, 2013 In the Office of the Clerk of Court W A State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STA

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 3, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. For the Court. /s/ Fairhurs

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Justice BREYERdelivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, an individual detained in a jail prior to trial brought a claim under Rev. Stat. § 1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against several jail officers, alleging that they used excessive force against him, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clau

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from an attempt to enforce a settlement agreement signed by Plaintiffs-Appellees William and Patricia Hendrickson, the United States, and the district court more than thirty years ago. In 1985, the district court clearly indicated its approval of the terms of a settlement agreement resolving Plaintiffs’ suit against the United States; in 2013, Plaintiffs allege, the Unite

Summary Judgment, RCFC 66; Breach of Contract; Annuity. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRIGGSBY, Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, William T. Hendrickson and Patricia Hendrickson, brought this breach of contract action alleging that the government breached a stipulation for compromise settlement agreement (th

Korsmo, C.J. ¶1 Kathy Ann Hendrickson uses the Internet to avenge herself on people she does not like. Her activities led to 10 convictions, including three counts of cyberstalking; two counts each of threatening to bomb, felony harassment, and intimidating a public servant; and a single count of second degree identity theft. Concluding that a candidate for judicial office is not a public servant and that a threat to bomb must t

WIGGINS, J. ¶ 1 Heidi Jo Hendrickson brought this action against the Moses Lake School District (Moses Lake or the District) to recover for injuries she suffered while operating a radial table saw in a woodshop class at Moses Lake High School. The jury found that Moses Lake was negligent but that its negligence was not a proximate cause of Hendrickson's injuries. Hendrickson appealed,

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 10-1-00184-8, Donald W. Schacht, J., entered December 12,2012 .Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Korsmo, C.J., concurred in by Brown and Siddoway, JJ.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KEVIN B. HENDRICKSON and JANE ) No. 77526-0-1 DOE HENDRICKSON, husband and wife ) and the marital community composed ) DIVISION ONE thereof; and JOHN AND JANE DOES ) NOS. 1-10, ) PUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellants, ) ) v.

198 P.3d 1029 (2009) STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Kevin Lawrence HENDRICKSON, Petitioner. In re the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Kevin Lawrence Hendrickson, Petitioner. No. 80245-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued October 30, 2008. Decided January 15, 2009. *1030 David L. Donnan, Th

*916¶1 Quinn-Brintnall, J. The State appeals the superior court’s decision on a RALJ appeal reversing Andrew Christian Hendrickson’s district court conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). The issues on appeal are (1) whether the district court properly allowed testimony about Hendrickson’s statements before the State presented evidence e

*829¶1 Kevin Hendrickson is a tow truck driver who stored financial information, some belonging to clients, in a stolen trailer. He appeals his convictions for three counts of second degree identity theft on grounds of improper searches and arrest, ineffective assistance of counsel, insufficient evidence, and several other issues. Because his conviction for count 16 rests solely on highly prejudici

¶1 Kevin Hendrickson was charged with possession of stolen property and identity theft. At trial, some of the charges were dismissed, Hendrickson was convicted of others, and the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on the possession charge. After sentencing on the convictions, the State moved to dismiss the possession charge without prejudice, submitting a proposed order that the trial court signed. The clerk's office later determined that the order was inartfully drafted in that

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 04-1-09625-8, Julie Spector, J., entered July 12, 2004. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its July 10, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 That the motion to strike is granted and the petition for review is denied. ¶ 4 For the Court

168 P.3d 421 (2007) STATE of Washington, Appellant, v. Andrew Christian HENDRICKSON, Respondent. No. 34580-3-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. September 25, 2007. Michelle Hyer, Pierce County Prosecutor, Tacoma, WA, for Petitioner. Paul Joseph Landry, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent. QUINN-BRINTNALL, J. ¶ 1 The State ap

Korsmo, J. ¶21 (dissenting) The jury determination that Ms. Hendrickson was the cause of her own injury should be dispositive here. The error in instructing the jury on the school district’s heightened duty of care was harmless in this circumstance. ¶22 I agree with the majority and the recent authority indicating that the plaintiff was entitled to an instruction indicating that the school district had a special

187 P.3d 271 (2008) 163 Wash.2d 1039 STATE v. HENDRICKSON. IN RE HENDRICKSON. No. 80245-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. June 6, 2008. Disposition of petition for review. Granted.

158 P.3d 1257 (2007) STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Kevin Lawrence HENDRICKSON, Appellant. In re Personal Restraint Petition of Kevin Lawrence Hendrickson, Petitioner. Nos. 34445-9-II, 35060-2-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. May 30, 2007. *1258 Sheri Lynn Arnold, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant. Kevin L.