Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Washington v. Martin Resource Management”
Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
564 F.3d 1374 (2009) AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, and Lockheed Martin Federal Healthcare, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 2008-5072, 2008-5073. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 4, 2009. *1375 James S. DelSordo, Argus Legal, LLC, of Manassas, VA
Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER DENYING TO STAY THE FEBRUARY 26, 2008 FINAL ORDER. BRADEN, Judge. I. BACKGROUND.1 On September 28, 2007, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a Memoran*523dum Opinion and Order, determining that the United States Department of Defense (“DOD”) Contracting
Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER GRANTING LIMITED INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. BRADEN, Judge. I. THE COURT’S POST-DECISION INQUIRY REGARDING RELIEF.1 On September 28, 2007, the United States Court of Federal Claims held that the Contracting Officer (“CO”), in this case, violated Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) § 9.504(a),2 by not
Axion Resource Management, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
*330ORDER The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
591 F.Supp.2d 1206 (2008) WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS, Jeanie Alderson, Wally McRae, Wyoming Outdoor Council, Natural Resources Defense Council, Powder River Basin Resource Council, Plaintiffs, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Director, in her official capacity also known as Kathleen Clarke, Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of Interior, Secretary, in her official capacity, also known as Gale A. Norton, United States
*109 OPINION 2 HEWITT, Chief Judge. This is a post-award bid protest brought by Matt Martin Real Estate Management LLC (Matt Martin or plaintiff), an unsuccessful offeror in Solicitation R-OPC-23441 (Solicitation) issued by the United States government acting through the United States Department of Housi
Martin v. Sprint United Management Co.public domain
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiffs Jamie Martin and Daneisha Singleton bring this action on behalf of themselves and similarly situated persons, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et. seq. (“FLSA”), and the New York Labor Law, N.Y. Lab. Law § 650, et. seq. (“NYLL”). Plaintiffs served as field agents securin
Assured Guaranty Corp. v. Financial Oversight & Management Board (In re Financial Oversight & Management Board)public domain
HOWARD, Chief Judge. In this case, the able district court judge followed the guidance provided in a prior opinion of ours. Unfettered by the constraints that bound the district court, we now chart a different course. Movant-Appellant Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (“UCC”) appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene in an adversary procee
Martin v. Omni Hotels Management Corporationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Ms. Kathleen Martin, sued Defendant for injuries she sustained after tripping on a wrinkled floor mat in the lobby of Defendant’s hotel. This Court granted Defendant summary j
Martin v. Omni Hotels Management Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KATHLEEN C. MARTIN, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 14-cv-2182 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 14 : OMNI H
State of Washington v. John Martin Malingpublic domain
FILED DECEMBER 18, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 35272-2-III
Charity v. Davis Resource Management, Inc.public domain
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and oral argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms, with modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.
Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER * BRADEN, Judge. The federal government’s increased use of and dependence on outside contractors to *577perform essential government functions1 of-ten entails providing these contractors with governmental, business proprietary, and otherwise prívate information t
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge. Appellants — the Northwest Forest Resource Council (“NFRC”) et al., an industry/labor/citizen coalition — appeal the District Court’s decision dismissing their claims arising out of the 1994 President’s Forest Plan. Northwest Forest v. Secreta
ORDER ON SECOND MOTION OF DEFENDANT OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Paul W. Bonapfel, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Kirk Wright allegedly operated International Management Associates, LLC (“IMA”) and affiliated entities as a Ponzi scheme. Mr. Wright opened a brokerage account with the defendant Oppenheimer & Co. (“Oppenheimer”) in the name of IMA and transferred funds of IMA to the acco
HOWARD, Chief Judge. In this case, the able district court judge followed the guidance provided in a prior opinion of ours. Unfettered by the constraints that bound the district court, we now chart a different course. Movant-Appellant Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (“UCC”) appeals from the district court’s denial of
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW This case presents the question whether section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. § 1344, authorizes the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to require a landowner to obtain a dredge and fill permit from the Corps before constructing a municipal solid waste landfill on a wetlands site. We hold that the construction of
608 F.3d 709 (2010) BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE; George Wuerthner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, American Lands Alliance, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency within the Department of Interior; Ken Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Interior, Defendants-Appellees, Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc.; Western Gas Resources, Inc.; Fidelity Exploration & Production Company; Willi
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge. This action arises from the unprecedented collapse of the Reserve Primary Fund, a money market fund that, as of September 14, 2008, held debt securities issued by Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”) with a face value of $785 million, amid total assets under management of $62.5 billion. After Lehman announced on September 14 that it
151 F.3d 1162 47 ERC 1065, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,407,98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5781,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8053 RESOURCE INVESTMENTS, INC. a Washington corporation; LandRecovery, Inc., a Washington corporation,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; James D. Green, ProjectManager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Donald T. Wynn,Colonel, District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of En