Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA F I L E D JUL 2 9 2013 CURTIS LEE WATSON, ) clerk, u.s. oism¢¢ and ) Ba"'<rupfcy courts Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) civil Aca@n N@. \ g ._\ \§ ( ) BUREAU oF PRISONS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM 0P1NION This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint. The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, kee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS

ROBERT B. KUGLER, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Jerry R. Belt, is a federal prisoner currently incarcerated at FMC Lexington in Lexington, Kentucky. Plaintiff was previously incarcerated at FCI Fort Dix in Fort Dix, New Jersey and FCI Ashland in Ashland, Kentucky. He is proceeding pro se with a civil complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Nam

227 F.Supp.2d 657 (2002) Michael ALEXANDER Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-CV-461-DCR. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky. London Division. September 6, 2002. Michael Alexander, Butner, NC, pro se. Jane Durkin Samuel, U.S. Attorney's Office, E.D. Kentucky, Lexington, KY, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on its initial review of pro se Plaintiff Steve Fos *34 ter’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and his accompanying Com

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge. Randle Cooke and Kendrick Douglas (collectively “plaintiffs”) are detainees in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4248. Each has been designated a “sexually dangerous person” under 18 U.S.C. § 4248 and is committed at the Butner Federal Correctional Complex in Butner, North Carolina. Plaintiffs have health conditions that require them to use

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-1601 (JDB) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs seek to compel the Federal Bureau of Investigation to comply with four requests for records under the Free

Matter of Jamison v Watson (2019 NY Slip Op 07651) Matter of Jamison v Watson 2019 NY Slip Op 07651 Decided on October 24, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRYANT, District Judge. Petitioner in her application for a writ of habeas corpus contends that the existence of an outstanding parole violator warrant as a detainer at the Women’s Reformatory at Alderson, West Virginia, renders her ineligible for certain rehabilitation programs (work release here in the District of Columbia), and that the Board of Parole by lodging the detainer and f

People v Watson (2019 NY Slip Op 05723) People v Watson 2019 NY Slip Op 05723 Decided on July 18, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

882 F.Supp. 1116 (1995) Edward J. KUFFEL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-2366 RMU. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 28, 1995. *1117 *1118 *1119 Edward J. Kuffel, Rochester, MN, pro

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3400 LEROY N. INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.J. WATSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

INMAN, Judge. *348 North Carolina law requires a sentencing criminal court to enter an order of commitment consistent with the judgment entered, and a defendant is entitled to entry of such order nunc pro tunc where no such order is entered. However, a commitment order en

Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge In this lawsuit, plaintiff Esther Koontz seeks injunctive and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She asks the court to enjoin enforcement of a Kansas law requiring all persons who enter into a contract with the State of Kansas to certify that they are not eng

FILED 3/31/2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia CURTIS LEE WATSON,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2683 BRUCE CARNEIL WEBSTER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. T. J. WATSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2683 BRUCE CARNEIL WEBSTER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. T. J. WATSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Davino Watson, a United States citizen, was held in immigration custody for three- and-a-half years on the mistaken belief that he was a deportable alien. He sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the “FTCA”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, Ji), asserting false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2432 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDLANDO M. WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the