Cases

Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

In this worker's compensation case, the facts giving rise to the appeal are not in dispute. The Industrial Accident Board awarded Stigger, the claimant, $2,377.62 in benefits. The carrier, Standard Fire, filed a timely suit in a county court at law of Dallas County to set aside the Board's award. Stigger answered and counterclaimed for benefits. After jury trial, the court rendered judgment for Stigger on the verdict in the amount of $34,692.21. Standard Fire urges on appeal th

ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff, Evanston Insurance Company, (“Evanston”) and Defendants Agape Senior Primary Care (“ASPC”), Floyd Cribbs, Kezia Nixon, and Scott Middleton (“collectively Agape Defendants”). In 2013, Evanston brought this declara

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and Opinion Filed August 3, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01092-CR KENNETH WATTS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1126 ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. THE GRAPHIC BUILDERS LLC, Defendant, Appellant, RCM MODULAR, INC., Defendant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSET

Appellate Case: 20-3172 Document: 010110716257 Date Filed: 07/26/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 26, 2022 Christ

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Watts Constructors, LLC ) ASBCA No. 61493 ) Under Contract No. W91238-14-C-0040 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Jason R. Thornton, Esq. Jeffrey B. Baird, Esq.

Revised April 29, 1999 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-60077 CAROLYN S. WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE KROGER COMPANY; ARTHUR BULLINGTON,

Anthony J. Trenga, United States District Judge The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment with respect to the only remaining issue-whether defendant David Watts violated the Stored Communications Act by accessing, without authorization, plaintiff Patrick Hately's personal email account and viewing several emails contained in that account.1 On February 2, 2018, the Court held a hearing on

Affirmed as modified; Opinion Filed January 23, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01092-CR KENNETH WATTS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial Distr

BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: In this insurance coverage dispute, we consider whether claims in an underlying personal injury suit against two contractors were covered under policies issued by Amerisure Insurance Company (Amerisure), in which the contractors were "additional insureds." Contending that the claims were excluded from coverage, Amerisure refused to participate in t

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Roxanne Brown-Boyd, Executrix of : the Estate of Brenda Watts : : v. : No. 1167 C.D. 2022 : Argued: April 9, 2024 Southeastern Pennsylvania : Transportation Authority and : Sharon Gonzales, : Appellants : BEFORE: HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WOJCIK,

Dissenting Opinion by Watts, J. Respectfully, I dissent. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland certified to this Court the following question of law: “Would application of Georgia’s interpretation of the pollution exclusion contained in the insurance policy issued by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company [ (“Li

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00127-SCT ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY, AXIS SPECIALTY EUROPE S.E., ENDURANCE WORLDWIDE INSURANCE LIMITED, HELVETIA SWISS INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, MS AMLIN CORPORATE MEMBER LIMITED, NAVIGATORS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., PARTNER RE IRELAND INSURANCE DAC, SWISS RE INTERNATIONAL S.E., LUXEMBOURG, ZURICH BRANCH, XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC., ZURI

ORDER KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (DE 18, hereinafter the “FAC”) filed by Defendants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”) and Twin City Fire Insurance Company (“Twin City”; with National Union, the “Insurers”) (DE 25, 28). Plaintiffs, Michael

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OSCN Found Document:MEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 549] and Motion to Supplement the Summary Judgment Record [Docket No. 698] of plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”), and the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding National Union’s Separate, Per Project, Completed Operatio

Prince George’s County v. Joseph Watts, No. 56, September Term, 2025, Opinion by Fader, C.J. LOCAL GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIMS ACT – “TORTIOUS ACT OR OMISSION” – STATE STATUTORY CLAIMS The Local Government Tort Claims Act (“LGTCA”) caps the amount of damages that can be awarded against a local government entity in a lawsuit arising from the “tortious acts or omissions” of local government employees committed within the scope of their employment and without malice. That cap does not apply generally

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENTERING A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT MARY GEIGER LEWIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff James Bruce Siron and his wife, Plaintiff Ellen Siron (collectively Plaintiffs) filed this action for a declaratory judgment regarding the enforceability of a provision in