⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Wayne Allan Lindgren”

District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992-12-21 · Published · cited 4× · 829 F. Supp. 1078; 1992 WL 437429
829 F.Supp. 1078 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ARROWHEAD REFINING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ARROWHEAD REFINING COMPANY, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Rodney A. ANDERSON, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 5-89-0202. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fifth Division. December 21, 1992.
People v. Kubatpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1983-01-24 · Published · cited 132× · 447 N.E.2d 247; 94 Ill. 2d 437; 69 Ill. Dec. 30; 1983 Ill. LEXIS 300
JUSTICE UNDERWOOD delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Robert Kubat, was indicted by a Lake County grand jury for the aggravated kidnaping and murder on November 2, 1979, of Lydia Hyde. Prior to trial, the State announced its intention to seek the death penalty, and after an extensive voir dire examination, a jury w
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 530 B.R. 44; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139804
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS. BACKGROUND I. A “big to-do”... 59 A. Emerald Casino, Inc. is created and issued a license to operate a riverboat casino... 60 B. Donald Flynn takes control of Emerald ... 61 C. Emera
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 829 F. Supp. 1078; 24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20115; 35 ERC (BNA) 2065; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20841
ORDER MAGNUSON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendants’ and third-party plaintiffs’ objections to Magistrate Judge McNulty’s Report and Recommendation dated November 10, 1992 granting third party defendant Mobil’s motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to statute, the court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Local Rule 72.1(c). Bas