Cases

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Complete General Construction Company ("Complete General"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendant-appellee, Kard Welding, Inc., d.b.a. Kard Bridge Products ("Kard"). We affirm. {¶ 2} On November 20, 2002, the Ohio Department of Transportation ("ODOT") requested bid proposals for Project No. 020508 ("ODOT project"), which involved the construction of a highway

*842MEMORANDUM KEVIN H. SHARP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Leah Lynn Rio, a former employee of Defendant NHC/OP, L.P. (“Defendant” or “NHC”), brings claims of. discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5 et seq, (“Title VII”) and the Tennessee Human Rights Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: *375 Premier Directional Drilling, L.P., challenges the summary judgment awarded William Parrish, Joshua D. Ellestad, Mario Alfaro, Thomas J. Beckett, and Matthew S. Robbins pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA),

Opinion issued October 31, 2024. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00760-CV ——————————— STARRY SKIES RANCH, L.P., JO ARC RESOURCES, INC., AND SALLY BLACKIE-SENGEL, Appellants V.

REYNA Circuit Judge. This case is about disavowal of claim scope. The specification and prosecution history of Poly-America, L.P.’s (“Poly-America”) U.S. Patent No. 8,702,308 (“ ’308 patent”) contain clear and unequivocal statements that the inventor intended to limit the claimed invention to a trash bag with “short seals” at its upper comers that extend inwardly to narrow the

[Cite as Boushack v. Grizes Invest., L.P., 2016-Ohio-355.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ANDY BOUSHACK JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J.

592 N.W.2d 414 (1998) 233 Mich. App. 150 Deborah L. CONNAWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELDED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 201559. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted June 3, 1998, at Grand Rapids. Decided December 15, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. Released fo

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HIGHLAND PIPELINE LEASING, LLC ) and SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, ) LP, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. N20C-08-275 EMD CCLD ) v. )

NUMBER 13-13-00254-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ORION MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. F/K/A KING FISHER MARINE SERVICE, L.P., Appellant, v. HECTOR DE LEON, Appellee. On appe

No. 832 November 20, 2024 307 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Rafael Castillo RIVERA, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERLO CONSTRUCTION, LLC, a domestic limited liability company et al., and State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation, a state agency; Donna C. Wicher, PHD PC; Dr. Donna C. Wicher

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Best Buy Stores, L.P. (“Best Buy”) sued *1023 various commercial landlords 1 (collectively, “Landlords”) and the Landlords’ property manager, Developers Diversified Realty Corporation (DDRC), alleging that DDRC impe

No. 832 November 20, 2024 307 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Rafael Castillo RIVERA, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERLO CONSTRUCTION, LLC, a domestic limited liability company et al., and State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation, a state agency; Donna C. Wicher, PHD PC; Dr. Donna C. Wicher,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00436-CV Granite Construction Company and J. D. Abrams, L.P., Appellant v. Texas Department of Transportation, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-10-002178, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMOR

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00436-CV Granite Construction Company and J. D. Abrams, L.P., Appellant v.</

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge. We took this case en banc to consider modifying the criteria set forth in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp. for determining whether a contract for performance of specialty services to facilitate the drilling or production of oil or gas on navigable waters is maritime.1 After briefing and argument, the Court has decided to adopt a simp

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: We are yet again required to determine whether a contract is a maritime one. Here, the focus is on a contract to perform flow-back services to improve the performance of an offshore natural-gas well when performance eventually required the use of a crane barge. Plaintiffs Larry Doiron, Inc. and Robert Jackson argue that maritime law applies. Defendants Specialty Rental Tools & S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-968 (JEB) IRON KINGDOM, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Iron Kingdom, Inc. is in the business of fabricating steel for use in commercial construction projects. Along with its lawyer

By Judge Richard E. Moore I have read, re-read, and given consideration to the pleadings in this case, including the various memoranda, as well as my notes. I have given consideration to all of your arguments from the hearing on March 24,2015, and to pertinent case authority. This case presents essentially questions of the interpretation of contractual provisions, and points of contract law revolving arou

Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge I. Background This Memorandum and Opinion addresses the defendants' second motion to dismiss this securities-fraud amended complaint. The complaint arises from a highly publicized oil spill in an environmentally sensitive area on the California coast. The defendants responded, according to the plaintiffs, with a series of misrepresentations about t

Justice GREEN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice JOHNSON, Justice WILLETT, and Justice BOYD joined. In this case, we are asked to harmonize provisions in a pipeline construction contract to determine who bears the risk of obstacles in the pipeline’s path. Specifically,