Cases

Andrea R. Wood, United States District Judge Plaintiff Erin Terrazzino purchased a bag of Great Value All Natural Pita Chips ("Pita Chips") from Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s ("Walmart") website. Terrazzino alleges that despite the fact that the Pita Chips were prominently branded as "All Natural," the product contained a variety of synthetic, artificial, and heavily-processed ingredients. Consequently, Terrazzino has filed this

ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Sunshine Mills, Inc.’s Motion to Deny Class Certification (Doe. # 58), filed on December 14, 2007. Plaintiff filed an Opposition (Doc. #59) on January 16, 2008. Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Sunshine Mills, Inc. filed a Reply (Doc. # 62) on February 14, 2008. Defendants Menu Foods, Inc

Getty, J. In this appeal, a labor union seeks dismissal of an employer’s state law claims for trespass and nuisance on grounds of federal preemption. The employer, on the other hand, seeks to uphold an injunction to prohibit the labor union from holding demonstrations about the employer’s employment conditions on the employer’s priv

Case: 19-60719 Document: 00515528044 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2020 REVISED August 14, 2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

Case: 19-60719 Document: 00515527194 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 14, 2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

113 F.Supp.2d 1294 (2000) Terry HEATH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. NA99-63-C B/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division. September 26, 2000. *1295 *1296 Peter M. Burrell, Schwartz Manes & Ruby, Cincinnati, OH, Daniel J. Te

84 F.Supp.2d 775 (2000) Tina Louise JEFFERS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 3:99-0274. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. February 8, 2000. As Amended February 23, 2000. *776 Stuart Calwell, Charleston, WV, John Scaggs, Charleston, W

McAULIFFE, District Judge. The appellant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., used hidden recording devices to tape its employees’ private conversations. Plaintiffs, four former employees whose conversations were recorded, sued. Finding that Wal-Mart violated Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“Act"), 18 U.S.C. § 2520, a jury awarded each plaintiff $20,000. In

41 F.Supp.2d 943 (1999) Joseph C. DYRDA, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. 98 Civ. 2248 (DDA/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. January 15, 1999. *944 Owen R. Humphreys, Herbert, Welch, Humphreys & Grindberg, Forest Lake, MN, for plaintiff. *945 Andr

Walter Niblock, Special Justice, dissenting. INTRODUCTION I respectfully dissent to the opinion of the majority on all counts. Further, I am authorized to state that Special Justices Bell and Bonds join in this dissent. I would affirm the decision of Judge Reynolds, as it is my belief that the majority did not give due deference to the findings of

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 98-1049 JAMES DESILETS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant, Appellant.

812 S.W.2d 463 (1991) 306 Ark. 239 WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellant. v. Pam BAYSINGER, Appellee. No. 90-234. Supreme Court of Arkansas. July 1, 1991. *464 Curtis L. Nebben, Fayetteville, for appellant. Jim J. Johnson, Rogers, for appellee. WILLIAM F. SHERMAN, Special Justice. Pam Baysi

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint (doc. 16). Plaintiffs seek leave to join Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Sam’s West, Inc. as defendants. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion and grant Plaintiffs leave to amend their Complaint to join the two new parties.

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 28). The parties have filed briefs and evidentiary materials in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 29, 30, 36, 38, 39, 45), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes tha

CHARLES B. KORNMANN, United States District Judge *900BACKGROUND On April 7, 2014, plaintiff South Dakota Wheat Growers Association ("SDWG") filed suit in state court against Chief Industries, Inc. ("Chief") and Gateway Building Systems, Inc. ("Gateway") to recover damages incurred by SDWG as a result of the failure of a Chief

Eaton v . Wal-Mart Stores CV-97-245-SD 07/23/98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Catherine Eaton v. Civil No. 97-245-SD Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Maine Building Specialties Co.; Door Control, Inc. O R D E R Plaintiff Catherine Eaton brings this personal injury action against defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Maine Building Specialties Co., and Do

OPINION MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. Following a workplace altercation between plaintiff Curtis Wheat and one of Wheat’s co-workers, defendant Fifth Third Bank' terminated Wheat’s employment at the financial institution. Wheat then filed this lawsuit, asserting that his termination was motivated by racial animus, in violation of both Title VII of

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0084p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ CURTIS WHEAT, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

316 F.Supp.2d 944 (2003) David C. WHEAT and Kral Ann Wheat, Plaintiffs, v. Elmo T. KINSLOW, Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Enterprise Leasing Co.-Southwest, and the Western Motor Co., Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-2025-CM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 24, 2003. *945 *946 H. Scott