Cases

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., GOBEIL, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 29, 2023

444 B.R. 613 (2011) In re TOUSA, INC., et al., Debtors. 3V Capital Master Fund Ltd., et al., Appellants, v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc., et al., Appellees. Nos. 10-60017-CIV/GOLD, 10-61478, 10-62032, 10-62035, 10-62037. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 11, 2011. *618 Nancy A. C

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

828 F.2d 205 SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,v.TRAILER & TRUCK REPAIR CO., INC., a New Jersey corporationand Herb C. Enterprises, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, andthe Howard Savings Bank, a New Jersey corporation DefendantThird Party Plaintiffv.Joseph C. WOODCOCK, Jr., Third Party Defendant.Appeal of HERB C. ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant in No. 86-5760.Appeal of TRAILER AND TRUCK REPAIR CO., INC. A

45 Cal.App.4th 1 (1996) ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants; RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, Cross-complainant and Respondent, v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY et al., Cross-defendants and Appellants. GAF CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COLUMBIA CASUA

CLARK, Circuit Judge: The Secretary of Labor challenges the independent contractor status assigned to approximately 60 women operators of laundry pick-up stations by 10 related corporations, which we group here under the common appellation Pilgrim. 1 In capsule, each operator works at a separate location to which cust

*1179ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Plaintiffs American Hotel & Lodging Association and Asian American Hotel Owners Association (“Hotel Associations” or “Hotels” or “Plaintiffs”) have filed

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAND, District Judge. Plaintiff Doo Nam Yang brings this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., and the New York Labor Law § 190 et seq., alleging that defendants Gold Lee Jewelry Company (“Gold Lee”), ACBL Corporation (“ACBL”), and Han Sung Lee failed to pay overtime and spread of hours pay. He also brings a common law claim of

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Chief Judge: Trailer & Truck Repair Co., Inc. and Herb C. Enterprises, Inc. appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Shell Oil Company in Shell’s action for specific performance of an option of first refusal to purchase real estate, 638 F.Supp. 1105. Our review of the District Court’s interpretation of New Jersey law is plenary. Under New Jersey law, Shell is not, in the c

Justice GORSUCH delivered the opinion of the Court. *1737Sometimes small gestures can have unexpected consequences. Major initiatives practically guarantee them. In our time, few pieces of federal legislation rank in significance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There, in Title VII, Congress outlawed discrimination in the workplace on th

427 F.Supp.2d 327 (2005) DOO NAM YANG, Plaintiff, v. ACBL CORP., Gold Lee Jewelry Co., and Han Sung Lee, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 8987(LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 5, 2005. *328 *329 *330 Kenneth Kimberling, Steven Kyung, Choi,

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BoA” or “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss counts four through twelve of the second amended complaints (“Second Amended Complaints”) filed by Plaintiffs’ BNP Paribas Mortgage Corporation (“BNP”) and BNP Paribas (“BNPP”) (collectively, the “BNP Plaintiffs”) and

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

480 N.W.2d 223 (1992) Scott A. HAGEMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PARK WEST GARDENS and Midwest Management, Defendants and Appellees. Civ. No. 910193. Supreme Court of North Dakota. January 14, 1992. *224 Hannig Law Office, Moorhead, for plaintiff and appellant; argued by Jeffrey R. Hannig. Anderson & Bailly, Fargo,

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

513 F.Supp. 1100 (1981) ZENITH RADIO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al. Defendants. NATIONAL UNION ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al. Defendants. In re JAPANESE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Civ. A. Nos. 74-2451, 74-3247. MDL 189. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.</

556 F.Supp. 825 (1982) SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-0545. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 21, 1982. As Amended January 10, 1983. *826 *827