Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Whitaker v. Minter”
Brooke Whitaker v. Trinity Minter, Wardenpublic domain
09/08/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 1, 2017 BROOKE WHITAKER v. TRINITY MINTER, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 6943 Joseph Walker, Judge ___________________________________
Whitaker v. DeGraffenreidpublic domain
ORMOND, J. There is clearly a misjoinder of complainants in this case, which is fatal on general demurrer. [Bowie v. Minter, 2 Ala. Rep. 406.] The three persons who were sureties *305for Whitaker, have no interest in the matter, in controversy. — ■ Until they pay the debt of their principal, they can maintain no' action in their own names, based upon their liabil
Cummings v. Statepublic domain
968 P.2d 821 (1998) 1998 OK CR 45 Jessie James CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-96-657. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. August 4, 1998. Rehearing Denied November 3, 1998. Paul Faulk, Norman, Joseph O. Minter, Madill, for Defendant at trial. James Thornley, Durant, John McPhail, Atoka, f
Quinton A. Cage v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
07/06/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 9, 2020 QUINTON A. CAGE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 19C1642 Amanda Jane McClendon, Judge ___________________________________
Scandrett v. Statepublic domain
Melton, Justice. Following a jury trial, Darian A. Scandrett appeals his conviction for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, contending that the trial court admitted improper evidence and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.1 For the reasons set forth below, we af
United States v. Chairespublic domain
20-4162 United States v. Chaires United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2021 Argued: December 8, 2021 Decided: December 7, 2023 No. 20-4162 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appelle
Stockman v. Trumppublic domain
On March 23, 2018, Defendants Donald J. Trump ("President Trump"), in his official capacity as President of the United States; James N. Mattis, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Richard V. Spencer, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy; Ryan D. McCarthy, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Army; Heather A. Wilson, in her offi
Hill v. Pompeopublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTHONY HILL, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-2518 (DLF) ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary, U.S. Department of State, Defendant. 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Anthony Hill brings this action against the Secretary of the U
Roe v. Critchfieldpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REBECCA ROE, by and through her No. 23-2807 parents and next friends, Rachel and Ryan Roe; SEXUALITY AND D.C. No. GENDER ALLIANCE, an association, 1:23-cv-00315- DCN Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her official capacity as Idaho State
Roe v. Critchfieldpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RYAN ROE; RACHEL ROE; No. 23-2807 SEXUALITY AND GENDER ALLIANCE, an association, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00315- Plaintiffs-Appellants, DCN v. ORDER AND DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her AMENDED official capacity as Idaho State OP
Abbott v. Roundspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELAINE ABBOTT, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2717 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell JAMIESON GREER, Acting Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics, Defend
Richardson v. Dukepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN G. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. Civ. Action No. 17-1588 (EGS/ZMF) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPI
State of Tennessee v. Jason Matthew Campbellpublic domain
03/24/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 17, 2021, at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASON MATTHEW CAMPBELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Putnam County No. 2016-CR-739 David A. Patterson, Judge1 _________
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 30, 2017) COLLEEN KÓLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge . On July 26, 2017, President Donald, J. Trump,issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capa
Henley, Lotterhos & Henley, PLLC v. Amanda Bryantpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-IA-00994-SCT HENLEY, LOTTERHOS & HENLEY, PLLC v. AMANDA BRYANT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/11/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RICHARD A. SMITH TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: THOMAS M. FLANAGAN, JR. J. WALKER STURDIVANT AMANDA B. BARBOUR LA’TOYIA JENESSA SLAY
Hodges v. City of Milfordpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants City of Milford, City of Milford Police Department and Chief Mark Machan (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 22). Plaintiff Ralph Hodges (“Plaintiff’) has filed his opposition (Doc. 40), and Defendants have filed their reply (Doc. 41). This matter is now ripe for r
Idom v. Natchez-Adams School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER David Bramlette, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause is before the Court on the defendants Natchez-Adams School District, Frederick Hill and Tanisha W. Smith’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the alternative Motion for a New Trial, or in the alternative Motion for Remittitur pursuant to Rules 50 and 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (docke
Wellin v. Wellinpublic domain
ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The following matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation (“R <⅞ R”) by Special Master William L. Howard regarding non-party movant Dr. Ann Plum’s (“Plum”) motion for a protective order. ECF No. 370.1 For the following reasons, the court adopts as modified and rejects in part the R & R, and grants in part an
Hartzler v. Wolfpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) TAMMY HARTZLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3802 (GMH) ) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ) Secretary of
Parents for Privacy v. William Barrpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PARENTS FOR PRIVACY; JON GOLLY; No.18-35708 KRIS GOLLY, individually and as guardians ad litem for A.G.; NICOLE D.C. No. LILLIE; MELISSA GREGORY, CV 17-1813 HZ individually and as guardian ad litem for T.F.; PARENTS RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, an Oregon nonprofit OPINION corporation; LINDSAY GOLLY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v