⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “White v. Booze”

Booze v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997-08-26 · Published · cited 10× · 698 A.2d 1087; 347 Md. 51; 1997 Md. LEXIS 135
698 A.2d 1087 (1997) 347 Md. 51 Donald E. BOOZE v. STATE of Maryland. No. 105, Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 26, 1997. *1088 Michael R. Malloy, Assistant Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for Petitioner. Gary E. Bair, Assistant Attorn
White v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2021-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JASON WHITE, § No. 328, 2020 § Defendant Below, § Court Below – Superior Court Appellant, § of the State of Delaware v. § § I.D. No. 1808010617 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE,
State v. Boozepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 684 P.2d 1206; 1984 OK CR 75; 1984 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 181
[1] MEMORANDUM OPINION [2] This is an appeal on a reserved question of law from an instruction directing a verdict *Page 1207 in the District Court of Lincoln County. The instruction assigned as error stated: [3] Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: The Court has found as a matter of law that the undisputed testimony of the State of Oklahoma reveals that the officer engaged in the activity leading to the app
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008-12-03 · Published · cited 14× · 589 F. Supp. 2d 631; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102204
(2008) Rock E. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. Nicholas L. POTOCSKA, P.C., Nicholas L. Potocska, and Pamela G. Potocska, Defendants, Counter Claimants, v. Rock E. White, Ali E. Gunbeyi, and Evelyn S. Eidem, Counter Defendants. Action No. 2:07cv343. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. December 3, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER
Booze v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964-03-11 · Published · cited 12× · 390 P.2d 261; 1964 OK CR 34; 1964 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 161
390 P.2d 261 (1964) Roy Lee BOOZE, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error. No. A-13201. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. March 11, 1964. Claude Hendon, Shawnee, Carroll Samara, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error. Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joe Young, Jr., County Atty., Lincoln County,
Connecticut Superior Court · 1977-03-11 · Published · cited 39× · 382 A.2d 226; 34 Conn. Super. Ct. 632
The substitute complaint in this action, dated December 4, 1973, alleged that on November 1, 1972, Johnny B. Booze, Virginia Booze1 and Frederick E. Pratt executed a promissory note to the plaintiff in the amount of $2673.60, that since April 10, 1973, the note has been in default, and that *Page 633 there remains due and owing the sum of $2090.63 plus interest, late charges and reasonable attorney's fees. In an
Connecticut Superior Court · 1977-03-11 · Published · cited 24× · 382 A.2d 226; 34 Conn. Super. Ct. 632; 34 Conn. Supp. 632; 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 556; 1977 Conn. Super. LEXIS 207
The substitute complaint in this action, dated December 4, 1973, alleged that on November 1, 1972, Johnny B. Booze, Virginia Booze1 and Frederick E. Pratt executed a promissory note to the plaintiff in the amount of $2673.60, that since April 10, 1973, the note has been in default, and that *Page 633 there remains due and owing the sum of $2090.63 plus interest, late charges and reasonable attorney's fees. In an
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2006-03-24 · Published · cited 41× · 424 F. Supp. 2d 1271
424 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2006) Sarah C. WHITE, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Stefan Bournakel, Deceased, and as Next Friend of Nicos Robert Bournakel, a minor, Plaintiff, v. Carol Ann SABATINO, Bob's Maui Dive Shop, Inc. dba Maui Dive Shop, a Hawaii Corporation; 3090 Incorporated, a Hawaii Corporation; Ronald E. Wallach; John Does 1-20; Jane Does 1-20; Doe Corporations 1-20; Doe Partnerships 1-20; Doe Associates 1-20; Doe
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996-06-18 · Published · cited 1× · 930 S.W.2d 1; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082
SPINDEN, Judge. The appellants ask us to permit them to sue the passengers of a vehicle involved in a fatal crash in late 1992 in Richmond on the theory that the passengers encouraged the driver to operate the vehicle negligently. The circuit court dismissed all of the appellants’ claims against the passengers. We reverse in part and affirm in part. On December 5, 1992, Brandon White, while intoxicated, drov
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979-08-01 · Published · cited 14× · 396 N.E.2d 137; 181 Ind. App. 532; 1979 Ind. App. LEXIS 1366
396 N.E.2d 137 (1979) George WHITE, Appellant, v. WOOLERY STONE COMPANY, Inc., Appellee. No. 2-1278-A-436. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District. August 1, 1979. *138 K. Edwin Applegate, Applegate & Pratt, Bloomington, for appellant. Richard W. Guthrie, Stewart, Irwin, Gilliom, Fuller & Meyer, Indianapolis,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-05-11 · Published · cited 0× · 143 N.Y.S.3d 544; 194 A.D.3d 489; 2021 NY Slip Op 02993
Mave Hotel Invs. LLC v TS Worldwide, LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 02993) Mave Hotel Invs. LLC v TS Worldwide, LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 02993 Decided on May 11, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State La
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998-04-23 · Published · cited 25× · 134 F.3d 781
OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Penny Moore brought this action against the Board of Education of the Johnson City Schools (“Board”), and Dr. R. Mike Simmons, Superintendent (collectively, “Defendants”), under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a); the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitut
State v. Watsonpublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) ) v. ) ) KHALIF WATSON, ) ID NOs. 1703002846A&B ) Defendant. ) )
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1420 Doc: 37 Filed: 08/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1420 MARY FRANCES HERKERT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner, Social Security Administration,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DERRICK SIMS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-01243 (CJN) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Derrek Sims sued his former employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, alleging race d
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-08-03 · Published · cited 9× · 42 F.4th 550
Case: 21-10133 Document: 00516417327 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) JESSE MICHAEL WALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-3342 (ABJ)
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:22-cv-01499 (TNM) BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Harold Jean-Baptiste demands $450 million from Booz Allen Hamilton. Why? Because, he says, Booz Allen conspired w
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
01/05/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 4, 2023 Session PAUL PLOFCHAN v. JAMES HUGHEY ET. AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 17C727 Thomas W. Brothers, Judge ___________________________________
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered January 13, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,684-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** A