⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “White v. Yates”

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2011-09-21 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00274-CV Tanita F. White KEHOE and B. Scott Kehoe, Appellants v. R. YATES PROPERTIES, II, LTD., Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas
Love v. Yatespublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2008-11-04 · Published · cited 2× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 1155; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106946; 2008 WL 4821612
(2008) Terrell LOVE, Petitioner, v. James A. YATES, Warden, Respondent. No. C 05-3995 JSW. United States District Court, N.D. California. November 4, 2008. ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Terrell Love ("Petitioner"), a prisoner of the State of California, has fi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-06-17 · Published · cited 11× · 825 F.3d 1076; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10970; 2016 WL 3361543
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM ROUSER, No. 13-56152 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:11-cv-09123- RGK-JEM THEO WHITE; JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections; J. YATES; P. ORTIZ, Correctional Counselor II;
WREN v. YATESpublic domain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022-11-08 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 OK 88
WREN v. YATES2022 OK 88Case Number: 119642Decided: 11/08/2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 88, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. CHELSEY ANN WREN, P
WREN v. YATESpublic domain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 OK 88
WREN v. YATES2022 OK 88Case Number: 119642Decided: 11/08/2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 88, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. CHELSEY ANN WREN, Plaintiff/Appellee, v.<
State v. Yatespublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ohio 76
[Cite as State v. Yates, 2022-Ohio-76.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109821 v. : ERIC YATES, :
Yates v. Evattpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-08-02 · Published · cited 934× · 114 L. Ed. 2d 432; 111 S. Ct. 1884; 500 U.S. 391; 1991 U.S. LEXIS 2916
Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court. † This murder case comes before us for the third time, to review a determination by the Supreme Court of South Carolina that instructions allowing the jury to apply unconstitutional presumptions were harmless error. We hold that the State Supreme Court employed a deficient standard of review, find that the errors were not harmless,
State v. Yatespublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993-08-05 · Published · cited 4× · 137 N.H. 495; 629 A.2d 807; 1993 N.H. LEXIS 109
JOHNSON, J. The defendant, William A. Yates, II, appeals the Superior Court’s (Nadeau, J.) denial of his motion to set aside the jury’s verdict of guilty on a burglary charge. Yates alleges that he was convicted on the basis of false testimony in violation of the due process clauses of the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution. We reverse. Yates was convicted of burglarizi
People v. Yatespublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2018-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/23/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, B279863 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. ZM017426) v. DAVID YATES, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Count
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2025-05-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-IA-00204-SCT TLM INVESTMENTS, LLC v. SHANDA YATES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/05/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KELLY LEE MIMS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: NICHOLAS J. OWENS, JR. WILLIAM R. WHEELER, JR. JAMES R. FRANKS, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
People v. Yatespublic domain
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2018-07-23 · Published · cited 45× · 235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 756; 25 Cal. App. 5th 474
LUI, P.J. *476This case presents the following issue: May an expert relate as true the case-specific content of documents which were neither admitted into evidence nor shown to be covered by a hearsay exception? We conclude under People v. Sanchez (2016)
Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 883 P.2d 562; 18 Brief Times Rptr. 900; 1994 Colo. App. LEXIS 135; 1994 WL 195350
[1] The issue raised by Linda C. Yates (claimant) in this workers' compensation case is whether the offset for social security disability benefits is subtracted from the claimant's disability rate before or after the rate is reduced to the state maximum. The Industrial Claim Appeals Panel held that the social security offset is subtracted after the benefit rate is reduced to the state maximum. We affirm. *Page 563 [2] Claimant's average wee
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2020-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-169T (Filed: September 18, 2020) ************************************* JESSE GRAVES YATES, III, * Pro Se Plaintiff; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC * 12(b)(6); Tax Refund Suit; Claims Against P
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009-10-13 · Published · cited 33× · 2009 OK 79; 224 P.3d 679; 2009 Okla. LEXIS 84; 2009 WL 3261700
224 P.3d 679 (2009) 2009 OK 79 Steve R. WHITE, an individual and Nikki L. White, an individual, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. HENG LY LIM and Rachel Sunnora Lim, husband and wife, as individuals as well as Trustees of the Rachel S. Lim Revocable Living Trust dated November 9, 2002, Defendants/Respondents, and Karla Yates, as an individual, and Action Real Estate, L.L.C., an Oklahoma Corporation, Defendants/Petitioners.
White v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2004-02-05 · Published · cited 29× · 125 S.W.3d 41; 2003 WL 297547
OPINION LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice. Appellant, James Keelin White, was charged with the felony offense of intoxication manslaughter after the car he was driving struck and killed a bicyclist. Appellant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years’ confinement in accordance *43with a plea agreement. In a single point of error, appellant claims the tr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-10-08 · Published · cited 18× · 16 F.4th 256
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-30183 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cr-00238- SI-2 DIANA YATES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-30184 Plaintiff-Appellee,
Yates v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016-07-08 · Published · cited 0× · 227 So. 3d 1240; 2016 WL 3655298
WELCH, Judge. The appellant, Brandon Yates, was convicted, as an accomplice, of murdering Brandarius Hill, see § 13A-6-2, Ala.Code 1975; two counts of attempting to murder Tyris Miller1 and Jamar Thompson, see § 13A-6-2 and § 13A-4-2, Ala.Code 1975; and shooting into an occupied vehicle, see § 13A-11-61, Ala.Code 1975.2 Yates was sentenced to 40 years in prison for th
Yates Constr. Co.public domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-02-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA Nos. COA15-385, COA15-422, and COA15-525 Filed: 2 February 2016 Randolph County, No. 12 CVS 1384 AMERICAN MECHANICAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY L. BOSTIC, MICHAEL HARTNETT and JOSEPH E. BOSTIC, JR., Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ Rockingham County, No. 12 CVS 977 YATES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff,
State v. Yatespublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015-08-03 · Published · cited 1× · 2015 Ohio 3087
[Cite as State v. Yates, 2015-Ohio-3087.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2014-A-0044 - vs - : DENZIL A. YATES,
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
07/07/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 27, 2021, at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES YATES Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 18-02597 Chris Craft, Judge ___________________________________