Cases

FlLED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JAN 2 4 2018 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ' C|¢arkl U.S. District and ) Bankruptcy Courts WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No: 17-cv-01079-RCL ) WICAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. _INTRODUCTION This breach of contract case was brought by plaintiff Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. (“Whole Foods”) against its commercial landlord, defendant Wical Limited Partnership (“Wical”). Whole Foods’

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This breach of contract case was brought by plaintiff Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. ("Whole Foods") against its commercial landlord, defendant Wical Limited Partnership ("Wical"). Whole Foods's Amended Complaint, ECF No. 21, seeks relief on four separate counts. Before the Court is Wical's motion to dismiss all four counts. ECF No. 26.

SCHWELB, Senior Judge, with whom WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, and KRAMER and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, join, dissenting: The judges who join in this dissenting opinion adhere to1 or generally agree with2 the opinion of the division majority in Gause v. United States, 959 A.2d 671 (D.C.2008) (Gause I).3

967 A.2d 166 (2009) CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, and Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Appellants, v. ASHLAND, INC., Appellee. No. 07-CV-1004. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 19, 2008. Decided March 12, 2009. *167 P. Andrew Torrez, with whom Martin S. Himeles, Jr., Rober

SUTTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. The irregularities of the claim-review process prompt me to agree with the majority that LINA’s denial of Cooper’s request for long-term-disability benefits was arbitrary and capricious. Yet it is precisely for that reason — that LINA has yet to give Cooper’s claim the procedural review it is due — that I cannot u

PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), in accord with the Hearing Committee, has found that respondent, Samuel Cooper, III, violated D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3) (failure to comply with court order) and District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 8.1(b) (failure to respond to Bar Counsel’s lawful demand for information) and 8.4(d) (conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of just

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0177p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appella

959 A.2d 671 (2008) Larry A. GAUSE, Karlepa Wilkey, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 06-CF-20, 06-CF-47. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 17, 2008. Decided October 30, 2008. *673 Mikel-Meredith Weidman, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, Public Defender Service, was on t

623 F.Supp.2d 889 (2009) Charity M. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Respondent. Case No. 1:08-cv-320. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 3, 2009. *890 Frederick W. Bleakley, Bleakley Law Offices PC, Muskegon, MI, for Petitioner. Matthew L. Meyer, U.S. Attorney, Gran

600 F.Supp.2d 897 (2009) POLY-FLEX CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, v. NEYER, TISEO & HINDO, LTD., d/b/a NTH Consultants, a Michigan corporation, Defendant. Case No. 1:07-cv-1090. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 14, 2009. *902 Kristin Beals Bellar, David D. Grande-Cas

522 F.Supp.2d 844 (2007) Robert RABUCK, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-288. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 30, 2007. *845 *846 Troy W. Haney, DiIley Haney PC, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Ke

673 A.2d 603 (1996) David L. WOMACK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 93-CF-1548. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 11, 1995. Decided March 14, 1996. *605 Jon W. Norris, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Gretchen Franklin, Public Defender Service, were on the brief

27 A.3d 1164 (2011) In re D.W., Appellant. No. 08-FS-761. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 26, 2011. Decided September 1, 2011. *1165 Mikel-Meredith Weidman, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, Public Defender Service, and Jaclyn Frankfurt, Public Defender Service, were on the brief, for appe