Cases

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Crystal L. Wickersham; Crystal L. Wickersham, as personal representative of the Estate of John Harley Wickersham Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001124 CERTIFIED QUESTION ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Opinion No. 28003 Heard September 17, 2020 – Filed December 9, 2020 CERTIFIED QUE

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2131 CRYSTAL L. WICKERSHAM; CRYSTAL L. WICKERSHAM, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Harley Wickersham, Jr., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the

ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The following matter is before the court on defendant Ford Motor Company’s (“Ford”) motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the court grants in part and denies in part Ford’s motion. I. BACKGROUND1 On February 3, 2011, decedent John Harley Wickersham, Jr. (“Wickersham”)

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Crystal L. Wickersham; Crystal L. Wickersham, as personal representative of the Estate of John Harley Wickersham Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001124 CERTIFIED QUESTION ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Opinion No. 27904 Heard January 29, 2019 – Filed July 24, 2019 CERTIFIED QUE

HENLEY, Circuit Judge. Robert S. Meyers appeals from the decision of the district court 1 granting summary judgment for Ford Motor Company. Meyers sought declaratory and injunctive relief and money damages against Ford for alleged discrimination on the basis of race in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. We affirm.

701 S.W.2d 344 (1985) WICKERSHAM FORD, INC., Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY, Texas, et al, Appellees. No. 09 84 320 CV Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. December 12, 1985. Rehearing Denied January 2, 1986. *345 John H. Hannah, Jr., Tyler, for appellant. Louis Dugas, Jr., Orange, for appellees.

616 So.2d 512 (1993) BARRY COOK FORD, INC., Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee, Cross-Appellant. No. 91-2758. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 18, 1993. *513 William C. Owen and R. Vincent Russo of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tallahassee, for appella

The appeal is from the judgment of the court below affirming the resettlement of a foreign corporation's franchise tax by the Department of Revenue. The primary question involved is whether the formula enacted by the Act of May 16, 1935, P. L. 184, 72 PS 1871, amending the Act of June 1, 1889, P. L. 420, interpreted by this Court inCom. v. Columbia Gas and Electric Corp., 336 Pa. 209,8 A.2d

480 F.Supp. 894 (1979) Robert S. MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 77-6011-CV-SJ. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, St. Joseph Division. December 7, 1979. *895 Mark C. Ellenberg, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, Washington, D. C., and W. H. Utz, Jr., Utz, Litvak, Thackery, Utz & Taylo

363 S.W.2d 61 (1962) Jo Ann HOWARD, Individually and as Natural Guardian and Next Friend of Stephen Lee Howard, Carl Edward Howard, William Lester Howard and Emmett M. Howard, Jr., Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Respondent. No. 23536. Kansas City Court of Appeals, Missouri. October 1, 1962. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer Denied December 3, 1962.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1068 Doc: 90 Filed: 01/20/2026 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1068 NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY; SWISS RE CORPORATE SOLUTIONS AMERICA INSURANCE CORPORATION; FREEDOM SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; ALLIED WORLD NATIONAL ASSU

FRANCIS V. TDCJ-CID COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-258-CV CURTIS R. FRANCIS APPELLANT

407 F.3d 1038 Jerry GIEG, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.DDR, INC., an Oregon corporation, dba Courtesy Ford, and Woody Howarth, Defendants-Appellants.Joseph C. Wickersham, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Haselwood Buick-Pontiac Co., Defendant-Appellant.v.Martin Chaloupka, Lisa Bennett, Bradley Hayes, and John Inselman, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.SLT/TAG, Inc., an Oregon corporation, fka Thomason Auto Group, Inc. and Asbury Automotive Or

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–1154 Submitted February 18, 2025—Filed April 25, 2025 Estate of Phillip Raymond Morgan, by administrator and personal representative, Kera Morgan, Appellant, vs. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–1154 Submitted February 18, 2025—Filed April 25, 2025 Estate of Phillip Raymond Morgan, by administrator and personal representative, Kera Morgan, Appellant, vs. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation, Appelle

384 P.2d 885 (1963) 72 N.M. 447 Charles Edward LUVAUL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. RAY BARKER MOTOR COMPANY, Employer, and Pacific Employers Insurance Company, Insurer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 7214. Supreme Court of New Mexico. August 26, 1963. Sheehan, Duhigg & Christensen, Albuquerque, for appellant. Key, Cohen & May, Albuqu

300 F.3d 368 In re FEDERAL-MOGUL GLOBAL, INC.DaimlerChrysler Corporation; Ford Motor Company; General Motors Corporation, Appellants.In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.Hennessy Industries, Inc., Appellant.In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.MG Rover Group, Inc.; Nissan North America, Inc.; Volkswagen of America, Inc.; Volkswagen AG; Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC; BMW North America, Inc.; Volvo Cars North America, Inc.; Harley-Davidson Motor C

365 F.Supp. 1073 (1973) AMERICAN MOTOR INNS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOLIDAY INNS, INC., Defendant, and International Association of Holiday Inns, Intervenor-Defendant. Civ. A. No. 1623-72. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 5, 1973. *1074 *1075 Donovan, Leisure, Newton

229 A.2d 61 (1967) Isadore ZUCHOWSKI v. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY. Eq. No. 2396. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 3, 1967. *62 Edward I. Friedman, Providence, for petitioner. Carroll, Kelly & Murphy, Ambrose W. Carroll, Providence, for respondent. OPINION KELLEHER, Justice. This is a