⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Wiedeman v. Canal Insurance Company”

Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981-06-19 · Published · cited 35× · 307 N.W.2d 105; 209 Neb. 189; 1981 Neb. LEXIS 893
307 N.W.2d 105 (1981) 209 Neb. 189 Herman WIEDEMAN, Appellee, v. JAMES E. SIMON CO., INC., Appellant. No. 43293. Supreme Court of Nebraska. June 19, 1981. *106 Winner, Nichols, Meister & Douglas, Scottsbluff, for appellant. Wright & Simmons, Scottsbluff, for appellee. Heard before BOS
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998-01-21 · Published · cited 15× · 156 F.3d 523; 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20579; 45 ERC (BNA) 2089; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 865
156 F.3d 523 H. George DENT, Jr.; Ashley Realty Company, Incorporated, aSouth Carolina Corporation; Southern DredgingCompany, Incorporated, a South CarolinaCorporation, Plaintiffs,v.BEAZER MATERIALS AND SERVICES, INCORPORATED; Beazer East,Incorporated, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff-Appellants,v.AGRICO CHEMICAL COMPANY; Continental Oil Company; AmericanAgricultural Chemical Company; FOS-KEMLiquidati
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-11-18 · Published · cited 0×
17‐2832‐cv, 17‐2833‐cv, 17‐2834‐cv Donohue v. Milan; Donohue v. Milan; N.Y.S. Thruway Emps. v. N.Y.S. Thruway Auth. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2018 5 6 (Argued: March 13, 2019 Decided: November 18, 2019) 7 8 Docket Nos. 17‐2832‐cv, 17‐2833‐cv, 17‐2834‐cv 9 10 _________
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015-01-21 · Published · cited 1× · 411 S.C. 557; 769 S.E.2d 847; 2015 S.C. LEXIS 12
*564Chief Justice TOAL. I respectfully dissent because I read section 15-3-545(A) more narrowly than the majority. In my view, the plain language of section 15-3-545(A) applies to all lawsuits arising from the underlying tortious conduct of the medical professional. However, indemnification actions such as this one are legally distinct from the underlying tort. According
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2020-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., MCMILLIAN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules March 13,
Beazer v. Agricopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
Filed: August 24, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1148 (CA-89-2851-2-8) Beazer Materials and Services, etc., et al, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellants, versus Acrico Chemical Co., et al, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellees.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994-08-19 · Published · cited 33× · 642 So. 2d 274; 1994 WL 460676
642 So.2d 274 (1994) Johnnie STEPHENS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant, v. TOWN OF JONESBORO and State of Louisiana through Department of Transportation and Development, Defendants-Appellants. Alberta DOYLE and George Stephens, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants, v. TOWN OF JONESBORO, State of Louisiana through Department of Transportation and Development, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 25715-CA, 25716-CA.
District Court, D. South Carolina · 1995-12-28 · Published · cited 8× · 993 F. Supp. 923; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21845; 1995 WL 940693
993 F.Supp. 923 (1995) H. George DENT, Jr.; Ashley Realty Company, Inc., a South Carolina Corporation; and Southern Dredging Co., Inc., a South Carolina Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BEAZER MATERIALS AND SERVICES, INC. and Beazer East, Inc., Successors in Interest to Koppers Company, Inc.; Agrico Chemical Company, Continental Oil Company, American Agricultural Chemical Company; and Fos-Kem Liquidation Corporation, Defendants, of whom BEAZER MAT
Goodwin v. Misticospublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1949-10-24 · Published · cited 9× · 42 So. 2d 397; 207 Miss. 361; 1949 Miss. LEXIS 349
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County. Mrs. Goodwin filed suit there against Alex Misticos and Armand Coullet, alleging in her declaration that they operated a restaurant in the City of Jackson, and that at about 7 P.M. on April 1, 1948, she and her husband, T.P. Goodwin, entered said restaurant for the purpose of ordering a meal, and stated to the waitress that they wanted corned beef if it was not canned, and they both ordered corned beef, w