Cases

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY: PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #13) ARE OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CAROLYN W. COL-VIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT,

900 So.2d 1047 (2005) Dean IWAMOTO v. James M. WILCOX, et al. No. 2004-1592. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 6, 2005. Rehearing Denied May 18, 2005. *1048 James P. Doherty, Jr., Andrus & Doherty, Opelousas, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Dean Iwamoto. Janice M. Reeves, Hannah, Colvin &a;

MOORE, Judge. Ampro Products, Inc. ("the employer"), has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus directed to the Pickens Circuit Court ("the trial court") in a workers' compensation case filed by Toni Colvin ("the employee"). We grant the petition in part and deny it in part. Procedural History On September 18, 2015, the employee filed a complaint seeking workers' compensation benefits

Cochrane, P. J. The husband of claimant on December 12, 1917, was permanently and totally disabled while working for his employer and was paid compensation accordingly until the time of his death July 3, 1923. On the latter date he was climbing a ladder standing against a house in process of construction by his son-in-law and When about two or three feet from the ground fell, causing a broken neck and death. He had been a carpent

On Recall of Remittitur. Per Curiam. — The remittitur in this case was recalled upon petition of the respondent, in which it was suggested that the court had overlooked certain motions which were made a part of the petition and which should not have been decided without some affirmative expression of the court. The motions were, (1) for leave to file a supplemental transcript showing the complete record in the

252 B.R. 660 (2000) In re TRINITY MEADOWS RACEWAY, INC., Debtor. James Cunningham, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Trinity Meadows Raceway, Inc., Plaintiff, v. American Automatic Sprinkler, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 97-41302-BJH-7. Adversary No. 98-4069. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. September 12, 2000.

People v Monk (2025 NY Slip Op 01976) People v Monk 2025 NY Slip Op 01976 Decided on April 3, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cour

321 Ga. 565 FINAL COPY S25A0299. MCIVER v. THE STATE. ELLINGTON, Justice. Benjamin Clarence McIver appeals his convictions for malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Brandon Smith.1 McIver contends that his trial counsel provided 1 The crimes occurred on April 16, 2020. After being originally indicted on December 2, 2020, McIver, Antavius Teazia Wilcox, and James Alphonso Parker were reindicted by a Chatham County gran

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., MERCIER and BROWN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules August 13, 2

ACCEPTED 14-13-00492-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and COLVIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

OPINION PYLE, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Kelley L. Kelly ("Father") appeals the denial of his motion to correct error following the entry of the trial court's post-dissolution order awarding $5,000.00 in attorney fees to his former wife, Tiffany *435

STEPHEN R. BOUGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are four motions to limit or exclude expert testimony. Three *1125were filed by Defendants-Defendants' Motion to Exclude or Limit the Opinions of Plaintiff's Retained Expert Robert R. Rail (Doc. # 71), Defendants' Motion to Exclude or Limit the Opinions of Plaintiff's Retained E

OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. JOHNSON Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only </

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge: Aaron Carter brought a pro se § 1983 action primarily alleging violations of his rights under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), see 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc, et seq., as the result of -his former prison’s failure to accommodate his religious dietary needs.

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #24); SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #20); OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (DOC. # 20); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY WALTER H. RICE, District Judge. Based on the reasoning an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUSAN TSUI GRUNDMANN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25 - 425 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Constitution vests Congress wit

321 Ga. 854 FINAL COPY S24G1104. WALMART STORES EAST, LP v. LEVERETTE. PINSON, Justice. At common law, juries would routinely award “nominal dam- ages” to a plaintiff who proved the violation of her legal rights but failed to prove any amount of actual damages with enough certainty. These nominal damages were widely understood to be only a “trivial sum,” important for the fact of the award but not meaningful as an amount. In England, that sum was often a shilling (equivalen

*662SARGUS, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court in which, MOORE, J., joined. GRIFFIN, J. (pp. 670-71), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION SARGUS, District Judge. This appeal presents the question of whether two police officers possess a property interest in their continued employment. The district court held that