Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wilcox v. Garrett”
Williams-Garrett v. Murphypublic domain
106 F.Supp.2d 834 (2000) Lorraine WILLIAMS-GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. Lynn MURPHY, individually and d/b/a Centurion Financial Services, Ltd., Defendant. No. 4:99-1010-23. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division. July 19, 2000. *835 *836 Robert T. King, Wilcox, Buyck &
United States v. Garrettpublic domain
238 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BOYCE MARK GARRETT; LARRY DON KEITH; KENNETH VERNON RYDEEN; JIMMY DALE SULLIVAN; MICHAEL DEAN WOODARD; STEVEN CRAIG FINKLEA; AUSTEEN HARRIS KEITH; DALE ZANE KEITH; GLENN DALE WILCOX, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-10531 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, Fifth Circuit December 29, 2000
United States v. Garrettpublic domain
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: I. INTRODUCTION In this interlocutory appeal, the government seeks review of an order of the district court, which was entered the day of trial and which excluded 25 of its witnesses in a complex, multi-defendant conspiracy case involving the alleged adulteration of milk. The district court itself recognized that exclusion of these witnesses was tantamount to a dismissal of some of
Steven J Wilcox v. Damian Wheatleypublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STEVEN J. WILCOX, FOR PUBLICATION August 11, 2022 Plaintiff-Appellant,
Garrett v. Sympsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 SUE WALKER, JUSTICE I.Introduction This is an interlocutory appeal from a temporary injunction order prohibiting Appellants William T. Garrett and Lanetta M. Garrett from using their lake house for “commercial/business purposes,” from renting or leasing them lake house to multiple individuals, and from renting their lake house to any pers
Wilcox v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Darious Wilcox appeals the judgment of his convictions of one count of first-degree murder, four counts of armed kidnapping, and one count of armed robbery, as well as a sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the convictions and the death sentence. *366F
Wilcox v. VERMEULENpublic domain
SEVERSON, Justice (on reassignment). [¶ 1.] The proceeds from the settlement of multiple wrongful death lawsuits were paid into the Sheesley, Vermeulen, Bielstein Trust (SVB Trust) to be held pending a distribution of the funds. Stacie Wilcox, f/k/a Stacie Sheesley, personal representative of the Estate of Sheesley, brought this declaratory judgment action seeking to divide the corpus of the SVB Trust between
Hunt's Generator Committee v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.public domain
863 F.Supp. 879 (1994) HUNT'S GENERATOR COMMITTEE; Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.; Case Corporation; Chrysler Corporation; Cooper Industries, Inc.; General Motors Corporation; Harris Metals, Inc.; Journal/Sentinel Inc.; Ladish Company, Inc.; P.P.G. Industries, Inc.; Newell Co.; Nordberg Inc.; S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.; and Western Publishing Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY; Bucyrus-Erie Company; Town of Caledonia; Johns
United States v. Wilcoxpublic domain
631 F.3d 740 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Michael WILCOX, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-10950. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 20, 2011. *744 Matthew John Gulde, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Fort Worth, TX, for U.S. Kevin Joel Page (argued), Fed. Pub. Def., Dallas, TX,
Darious Wilcox v. State of Floridapublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC11-1017 ____________ DARIOUS WILCOX, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [May 8, 2014] (CORRECTED OPINION)
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00017-CV ________________ RANDOLPH JACK GARRETT, Appellant V. BARNETT CYCLES, LLC AND JERROLD BARNETT JR., Appellees _______________________________________
OPINION GARRETT, Judge: The Federal Land Bank of Wichita, now The Farm Credit Bank of Wichita (Land Bank), loaned money to Robert W. Shephard and Pamela A. Shephard (Shephards). Neither Shephards nor Land Bank are parties to this appeal. As collateral for the loan, Land Bank took a first mortgage on real property owned by Shephards. L. Faye Wilcox (Appellee or Wilcox) also loaned money to the Shephards. W
Hahn v. Garrettpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered March 21, 2005. The judgment, among other things, granted in part plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting judgment in favor of plaintiffs as follows: “It is ADJUDGED and DECLARED that plaintiffs ar
Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.public domain
ORDER BOWEN, District Judge. This is an action under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, for alleged employer violation of a collective bargaining agreement and union breach of its duty of fair representation. Both defendants have submitted motions for summary judgment. I. UNDISPUTED FACTS The following facts, viewed in the lig
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILCOXpublic domain
COMBS, J. {1 Thomas Joseph Wilcox (hereinafter, Wilcox), OBA No. 10153, was admitted to practice law in the State of Oklahoma on April 22, 1988. Wilcox is currently suspended re: SCBD 5775 pursuant to Rule 7.8 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 0.8. Supp.2007 Ch. 1, App. 1-A by order of this Court in State of Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Wileox, 2011 OK 70, 261 P.3d 60
Wilcox Operating Corp. v. Gemini Explorations, Inc.public domain
PEATROSS, J. |2Wilcox Operating Corporation (“Wilcox”) appeals a summary judgment in favor of Gemini Explorations, Inc. (“Gemini”). The trial judge found there to be no facts in dispute and that, as a matter of law, Wilcox had failed to comply with a previous settlement agreement between the parties. The summary judgment terminated the settlement agreement and an assignment of mineral interest executed pursuant to that settl
Garrett v. Holiday Inns, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Simons, J. P. The appeal is on the sufficiency of the third-party complaints. *470Defendants — third-party plaintiffs, are the lessee, owners and developers of a Holiday Inn in the Town of Greece, New York. They have been sued in five negligence actions seeking damages for wrongful death, personal injuries an
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILCOXpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILCOX OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar
In Re Estate of Wilcoxpublic domain
193 S.W.3d 701 (2006) In the ESTATE OF Irma Lou WILCOX. No. 09-05-523 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted April 13, 2006. Decided May 11, 2006. *702 David R. Toups, Toups Law Firm, LLP, Bryan, for appellant. Russell S. Briggs, Fibich, Hampton & Leebron, Houston, for appellees. Before McKE
in the Estate of Irma Lou Wilcoxpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ N