Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “William A. Waters”
William A. J. Ross, Jr. v. Aprile B. Waterspublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, September 02, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A14I0279. WILLIAM A. J. ROSS, JR., et al. v. APRILE B. WATERS. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a
William A. J. Ross, Jr. v. Aprile B. Waterspublic domain
Object not found! Object not found! The requested URL was not found on this server. If you entered the URL manually please check your spelling and try again. If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster. Error 404 efast.gaappeals.usWed Sep 17 12:03:23 2014 Apache/2.2.3 (Linux/SUSE)
Demarco Waters v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
02/28/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2022 DEMARCO WATERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 13-01885 James M. Lammey, Judge ___________________________________
Waters v. Rickettspublic domain
*996MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Joseph F. Bataillon, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, Filing No. 68, on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Filing No. 72, and on the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file supplement to motion for summary judgment, Filing No. 87. This
ROSS Et Al. v. WATERSpublic domain
Miller, Judge. Aprile B. Waters filed a medical malpractice suit against Dr. William A. J. Ross and Ross Orthopaedic Wellness Center, P.C., (collectively the “Defendants”) in DeKalb County State Court. Thereafter, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue and a motion to dismiss because they allege the statute of repose was not tolled under the Servicemembers C
United States v. Clinton Waterspublic domain
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Clinton Waters cooked methamphetamine at locations throughout southern Illinois and taught others to do the same. He eventually was caught and pled guilty to conspiring to manufacture a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). Waters had several prior convictions, including for enhanced domestic battery in violation of Illinois la
Waters v. Rickettspublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, Filing No. 10. This is an action for violation of civil rights brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief for violation of rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment by virtue of Nebraska’s exclusion o
Waters v. Blaggpublic domain
202 P.3d 110 (2008) 2008 MT 451 348 Mont. 48 Gary L. WATERS and Patricia Waters, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Cameron A. BLAGG, Jerry Paul Overman, Delbert E. Bowe and Linda M. Bowe, and all other persons, unknown, claiming or who might claim any right, title, estate, or interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the real property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiffs, ownership or any clou
502 F.2d 1309 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 577, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9658William A. WATERS and Donald Samuels, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WISCONSIN STEEL WORKS OF INTERNATIONALWilliam A. WATERS and Donald a corporation, and United Orderof American Bricklayers and Stone Masons, Local21, an unincorporated association,Defendants-Appellees.UNITED ORDER OF AMERICAN BRICKLAYERS AND STONE MASONS, LOCAL21, Defendant-Appellant,
Waters v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FREDERICK P. STAMP, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is about a washing machine and the products liability suit it inspired. After years of use, the plaintiffs allege that they found their washer had developed a “biofilm” that rui
Patane v. Nestlé Waters N. Am., Inc.public domain
Jeffrey Alker Meyer, United States District Judge Plaintiffs have filed this class action lawsuit alleging that defendant Nestlé Waters North America, Inc. fraudulently markets its Poland Spring water products as *386"spring water" when in fact it is not "spring water" as defined by law. Last year I dismissed the initial complaint without preju
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED DECEMBER 1996 SESSION May 7, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) NO. 01-C-01-9603-CR-00081 Clerk Appellate Court
Patane v. Nestlé Waters N. Am., Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISSBACKGROUNDThe principal complaint in these consolidated class actions has been filed in the docket of Patane v. Nestlé Waters North America, Inc. , 3:17-cv-01381(JAM). It alleges that Nestlé has long marketed its ubiquitous Poland Spring water products as "100% Natural Spring Water," despite the fact that it is not "spring water" as that ter
Waters v. Mageepublic domain
877 A.2d 658 (2005) Paula J. WATERS v. Charles F. MAGEE, Jr. No. 2003-630-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 12, 2005. *659 William F. Holt, Esq., Providence, for Plaintiff. *660 John D. Lynch, Jr., Esq., Warwick, for Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERT
Briggs v. Waterspublic domain
455 F.Supp.2d 508 (2006) Kerrie W. BRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. Gary W. WATERS, William O. Watson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of the City of Portsmouth, and the City of Portsmouth Sheriff's Office, Defendants. No. 2:06CV154. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. October 3, 2006. *509
Miller v. Waterspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Spain, J. Petitioner, a former sergeant in the City of Elmira Police Department, was indicted on various charges stemming from accusations that he had stolen property and falsified records in the course of his duties. In March 2004, County Court dismissed the indictment against petitioner in the interest of justice (see CPL 210.40) and ordered the records sealed (see
Susan Waters v. Pete Rickettspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs are seven same-sex couples seeking to marry in Nebraska or to have their marriage in another state recognized in Nebraska. They also seek state benefits incident to marriage. The district court 1 granted Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. It found that Article I, § 29 of the Nebraska
Waters v. Blandpublic domain
CASANUEVA, Judge. In this appeal involving primary residential responsibility for a minor child, the parties have raised a number of issues, only one of which has merit. In her cross-appeal in case number 03-3523, Ms. Bland contends that the trial court erred by failing to consider child care expenses when it fashioned the child support award. We agree. Section 61.30(7), Florida Statutes (2002), mandat
State v. William A.public domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
NUMBER 13-03-443-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORP