Cases

04/03/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 14, 2024 Session MORGAN ASHLEE HOOD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission No. T20192623-1 William A. Young, Commissioner

08/13/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 27, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM H. YOUNG Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 293343 Thomas C. Greenholtz, Judge No. E2017-00913-CCA-R3-CD The

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, May 11, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A26I0196. MARK A. LEE v. WILLIAM JOSHUA YOUNG. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00209-CV __________________ IN RE PAUL C. MURPHY IV, KELLY A. YOUNG, ELIZABETH ANN CROFFORD SMITH, AVERY CLAIRE CROFFORD, AND WILLIAM T. CROFFORD _______________________________________________________

PER CURIAM: Young is a California state prisoner, currently serving a life sentence for first degree murder. Following his conviction, in 1940, he was sentenced to die; however, life imprisonment was eventually substituted. In the court below, Young sought relief against certain prison officials and ten milli

O P I N I O N On July 23, 1993, at approximately 10:30 p.m., a motorcycle-tractor accident occurred on U.S. 322, a two-lane highway, in Ashtabula, Ohio. The parties to this *Page 501 appeal are Michael Coe, individually, Michael Coe, Administrator for the estate of Marjorie Lynn Coe, appellants, and William A. Young, individually, and William A. Young, d.b.a. Wagner Farms, appellees. A

PITMAN, J. | j This is an appeal after a remand wherein this court ordered the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue of an alleged breach of a plea agreement by the state. After the hearing, the trial court held that it was the Defendant, Cornelius Young, who had breached his plea agreement. Therefore, it held that the imposition of the original sentences consecutively, which was not in conformity with the

GOULD, Circuit Judge. William Young appeals his jury conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 1. Under de novo review, see United States v. Johnson, 357 F.3d 980, 983 (9th Cir.2004), we conclude that

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge | jThis appeal arises from the Phillips County Circuit Court’s denial of appellant Marti Johnson’s request to increase her ex-husband appellee William Young’s child-support payments. Johnson argues that the circuit court erred in not increasing Young’s child-support payments by not using the correct method to calculate Young’s i

Per Curiam Opinion Per Curiam. We find that Respondent, the Honorable Dean A. Young, Judge of the Blackford Circuit Court, engaged in judicial misconduct relating to a temporary restraining order that he heard and issued without adequate notice to the responding party or witnesses, and while he had a specific interest in the subject matter. The

07/14/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 18, 2022 Session1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. COREY YOUNG Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. C1802280, 18-01293 W. Mark Ward, Judge ______________________

BADALAMENTI, Judge. Michael Young petitions this court for a writ of certiorari. . He seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his assistant public defender’s motion to withdraw *958 based upon a conflict of interest. After careful review, we have determined that the trial court, departed f

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with harassment, stalking and violating facility correspondence procedures. The charges stem from petitioner sending a letter to a correction officer wherei

Judges Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: *682Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The th

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with harassment, stalking and violating facility correspondence procedures. The charges stem from petitioner sending a letter to a correction officer wherei

222 S.W.3d 454 (2006) Barbara Gail YOUNG, Appellant, v. FIRST COMMUNITY BANK, N.A., Appellee. No. 01-05-00910-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). October 26, 2006. Robert A. Plessala, Cokinos, Bosien & Young, Houston, for appellant. James William Freyer, Houston, for appellee. Panel consists of Chief Justice RADACK and Justices ALCA

877 A.2d 625 (2005) Edward E. YOUNG, Sr. v. STATE. No. 2003-454-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 1, 2005. *626 Edward E. Young, Sr., Plaintiff Pro Se. Lauren Sandler Zurier, Providence, for Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, JJ. OPINION PER CURIAM.

*831In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated February 15, 2012, which, without a hearing, in effect, denied her petition alleging that the father violated certain provisions of an order of the same court dated January 28, 2009. Ordered that the order is affirm

*831In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated February 15, 2012, which, without a hearing, in effect, denied her petition alleging that the father violated certain provisions of an order of the same court dated January 28, 2009. Ordered that the order is affirm

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendants Chris Young (“Young”), Demetrius Duncan (“Duncan”), Alto Parnell (“Parnell”), and Brian Vance (“Vance”) (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and sentences (collectively, “judgments”) entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee for conspiracy, inter alia, to distribute and possess with intent to distribut