Cases

MEMORANDUM BARTLE, District Judge. Pro se plaintiffs Allen L. Feingold (“Feingold”) and Barbara Quinn as Executrix of the Estate of Theresa Thompson (“Thompson”) bring this diversity action for punitive and other damages against Liberty Mutual Group, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Guard Auto Company, and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (collectively “Liberty Mutual”) for violation

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LORI W. WILL LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 Date Submitted: October 21, 2022

Order affirmed.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT ALLEN FEINGOLD, : No. 315 EAL 2019 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT ALLEN FEINGOLD, : No. 315 EAL 2019 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

*56OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Respondent Larry E. Feingold was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on February 7, 1983 as Larry Edward Feingold. At all times pertinent to this proceeding, he was an Administrative Law Judge with New York City’s Environmental Control Board and maintained an offi

Order affirmed. Spaulding, J., absent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered April 26, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion seeking summary judgment on their third, fourth, fifth, forty-fifth and forty-sixth causes of action and dismissal of the affirmative defenses to those causes of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion to the extent of dismissing the second, third and fourth affirmative defenses, only insofar a

ROBERTS, Justice, dissenting. Appellants Allen Feingold and A. L. Feingold Associates filed a complaint in equity in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, alleging that appellee Bell of Pennsylvania: (1) wrongfully disconnected a device designed to refer persons calling appellants to appellants’ correct telephone number; (2) wrongfully disconnected appellants’ telephone service upon discovering appellants had

F.I. PARKER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Larry E. Feingold (“Feingold” or “plaintiff’) appeals from a decision and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jed S. Rakoff, J.) entered on July 31, 2002. Feingold alleged that while employed as an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) by the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) he was subjected to disparate treatment and a ho

366 F.3d 138 Larry E. FEINGOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The State of NEW YORK, the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Leon Schulgasser, Kathleen A. Sullivan, Evelyn Waltrous, Sharon Lee-Sang, Fernando Tapia, Phyllis Isaacs, Other Administrative Law Judges and Employees, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 02-7985. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

PER CURIAM: Allen Feingold, a Chapter 7 debtor, appeals the district court’s reversal of the *1270 bankruptcy court’s order denying relief from the automatic stay to the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (the “Disciplinary Board”). This appeal presents the question of whethe

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. William DeSimone v. Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. (A-37-22) (087891) Argued September 26, 2023 -- Decided January 10, 2024 FASCIALE, J., writing for a unanimous Court. The Court considers whether

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. William DeSimone v. Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. (A-37-22) (087891) Argued September 26, 2023 -- Decided January 10, 2023 FASCIALE, J., writing for a unanimous Court. The Court considers whether t

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered July 17, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court properly denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability in this action where plaintiffs are seeking to recover rent abatements they allege are ow

329 Pa. Superior Ct. 437 (1984) 478 A.2d 868 Valerie SIMS v. Allen FEINGOLD, individually and t/a A.L. Feingold Associates, Appellants. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 8, 1984. Filed July 13, 1984. *438 Allen Feingold, in propria persona. Harold F. Kaufman, Philadelphia, for appellee.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON CLYDE GERALD FULLER, JR. ) and BRENDA S. FULLER, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellant, ) Tipton Circuit No. 4614 ) VS. ) Appeal No. 02A01-9809-CV-00252 ) SHELDON B. FEINGOLD, ANNIE M. FEINGOLD, and

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered October 8, 1985, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain tape recordings made pursuant to telephone wiretaps.</

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 248 KA 09-01869 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM LIGGINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JAMES A. BAKER, ITHACA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. Appeal,

OPINION By MILLE'R, J. This is a law appeal from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court holding that contributions due to the Unemployment Compensation Fund from an employer are not taxes and that it is therefore a debt dischargeable under Section 17-1 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act which provides: “Debts not affected by a discharge. A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt fr