Cases

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Decision and Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the briefs and oral argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Decision

OWEN, William C., Jr., Senior Judge. The primary question presented here is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellants’ motion for new trial on the grounds of inadequacy of the verdict. On the facts of this ease we answer in the affirmative and reverse. Appellant Marilyn Casper, a merchandise representative for a hosiery manufacturer, served certain retail stores in Broward Coun

OPINION POLLACK, District Judge. Since bail was fixed for the defendant Melville, detailed facts have come to the attention of the Court having a material bearing on the discretion to be exercised which compel a modification of the terms previously set for the release of the defendant pending trial. The history of the bail arrangements thus far is that following arrest the United State

10 Md. App. 118 (1970) 268 A.2d 497 THOMAS ROBERT MELVILLE, GEORGE JOSEPH MISCHE, JOHN JOSEPH HOGAN, REV. DANIEL BERRIGAN, MARJORIE LOIS MELVILLE, JAMES McGINNIS DARST, MARY ASSUMPTA MOYLAN, THOMAS PAHL LEWIS, AND REV. PHILIP FRANCIS BERRIGAN v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 328, September Term, 1969. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided August 5, 1970

Rooney v George Hardy St. Francis Apts., LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 01714) Rooney v George Hardy St. Francis Apts., LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 01714 Decided on March 12, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New Yor

Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co. of Am. v George (2020 NY Slip Op 02801) Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co. of Am. v George 2020 NY Slip Op 02801 Decided on May 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On July 2, 2013, the Plaintiff Nitesh Ahluwalia (the “Plaintiff’), a citizen and resident of Canada, commenced a diversity *256action, under docket no. 13-cv-3753, against the Defendants St. George’s University, LTD. (“SGU Ltd.”), a Grenadian entity that owns and operates the medical school lo

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0154p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ESTATE OF GEORGE BERNARD WORRELL, JR., │

703 F.Supp.2d 348 (2010) In re EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC DEFENCE & SPACE CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 08 Civ. 5389(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 26, 2010. *350 Samuel H. Rudman, Esq., David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Jarrett S. Charo, Esq., Coughlin, Stoia, Geller, Rudman & Robbins, LLP, Melville, NY, for Plaintif

PITMAN, J. Plaintiff George M. Gilmer, Jr., appeals the judgment of the trial court which granted motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants, Principle Energy, L.L.C., f/k/a/ Regal Energy, L.L.C. ("Principle"), and Classic Production Services, Inc. ("Classic"), finding that the drilling of a shut-in well, which had been tested for production of minerals, interrupted prescription on a royalty interest. Plaintiff also appeals

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge In this action, plaintiffs Wilmina Shipping AS and Wilhelmsen Marine Services AS have challenged an order issued by the U.S. Coast Guard on May 21, 2010. Plaintiffs own and operate a Norwegian-flagged oceangoing tank vessel, the M/T Wilmina. The Coast Guard issued the order

MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge This case presents an issue of first impression regarding the United States Coast Guard’s statutory authority to impose • non-financial conditions for the release of a foreign-flagged vessel that the agency has detained at a United States port due to suspected violations o

628 F.Supp.2d 329 (2009) FRANCARL REALTY CORPORATION, Viking Star, Inc., Viking Starship, Inc., Viking Quest, Inc., Viking Good Times, Inc., Paul G. Forsberg, Sr., Hank Lackner, George Shiminski, William J. Modica, Strettle F. Whitting, and William Grimm, Plaintiffs, v. The TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON, Defendant. No. 05-CV-1792 (SJF)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York.

472 F.Supp. 738 (1979) FAMOLARE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MELVILLE CORP., Thom McAn Shoe Company, Inc., Pearlridge Thom McAn, Inc., Ala Moana Thom McAn, Inc., Fort St.-Honolulu Thom McAn, Inc., Waialae Thom McAn, Inc., Kamehameha Thom McAn, Inc., John Does One through Four, Defendants. No. C-77-0525-WWS. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. June 14, 1979.

OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge. We are concerned here with an interpretation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S. C. § l. 1 The District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania held 2

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Appellants Otis J. Holloman and Jonella Holloman appeal from the district court’s order of final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee Mail-Well Corp. (“Mail-Well”) on their claims brought under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1114. After thorough review, we conclude that the district court correctly g

Irving Lang, J. This is an application to fix bail on a complaint issued from this court charging the defendant with multiple bombings in New York City. In order to understand the nature of the case and the application involved herein, it is important to set out a chronology of events. On November 13,1969, the defendant was arrested by Federal and city officials in possession of two dynamite bombs each equipped

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1068 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1069 OPINION James William Herring appeals from a judgment following conviction by jury that he committed assault

POSNER, Circuit Judge. In 1999 the Chicago Board of Education brought this suit for copyright infringement against a Chicago public school teacher named Schmidt and a corporation that owns a local newspaper called Substance, aimed at such teachers, which Schmidt edits. (To simplify the opinion, we’ll ignore the corporation.) In August 2002 the magistrate judg

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs appeal from a decision denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the Town of East Hampton, the defendant in this action. At issue is whether Local Law No. 40 of 1997 of the Town of East Hampton (“the Ferry Law”) (1) violates the dormant Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, and/or (2) constitutes an ultra vires exercise of East