Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “William M. Rodriguez and Cynthia M. Rodriguez”
Rodriguez v. Doepublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellant Isidoro Rodriguez, a disbarred attorney proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims alleging treason, Va.Code Ann. §§ 18.2-481(5), 18.2-482; Racketeering Influenced and Corruption Organization Acts (“RICO”) violations, 18
Rodriguez v. Williamspublic domain
42 Wn. App. 633 (1986) 713 P.2d 135 DAYLETTE M. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. DARRELL WADE WILLIAMS, Defendant, AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. PEMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. THOMAS L. HOGLUND, ET AL, Respondents. Nos. 13166-4-I; 15929-1-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. January 21, 1986.
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-20-00035-CV Carol OCHSE and William W. Ochse, III, individually and as trustee of the William W. Ochse III Family 2008 Trust, Appellants v. Cynthia Cadwallader
ACCEPTED 03-14-00717-CV 3677007 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:35:57 AM
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 22, 2020 No. 04-20-00035-CV Carol OCHSE and William W. Ochse, III, individually and as trustee of the William W. Ochse III Family 2008 Trust, Appellants v. Cyn
Pena-Rodriguez v. Peoplepublic domain
Colorado Supreme Court Opinions || May 18, 2015 Colorado Supreme Court -- May 18, 2015 2015 CO 31. No. 13SC9. Pena-Rodriguez v. People. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue ⢠Denver, Colorado 80203 2015 CO 31 Supreme Court Case
Pena-Rodriguez v. Coloradopublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2016 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Rodriguez v. Shulmanpublic domain
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez have moved to centralize this litigation in the Western District of Washington or an “impartial panel” comprised of jurists outside the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and D.C. Circuits. Three groups of defendants oppose centralization:1 <
United States v. Rodriguezpublic domain
675 F.3d 48 (2012) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Carlos RODRIGUEZ, Defendant, Appellant. No. 10-1984. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard October 3, 2011. Decided March 28, 2012. *50 Bernard Grossberg for appellant. Cynthia A. Young, Assistant U.S. Attorney, with whom Carmen M. Ortiz, United
Cynthia Dominguez v. Statepublic domain
OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Appellant Cynthia Dominguez appeals her conviction for intoxication manslaughter. In five issues, Appellant challenges the voluntariness of her guilty plea, contends the trial court abused its discretion by failing to informally inquire about Appellant’s competency, to order a competen
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00035-CV Carol OCHSE and William W. Ochse, III, individually and as trustee of the William W. Ochse III Family 2008 Trust, Appellants v.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 5, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00549-CV GLYNN WALKER AND MELINDA DEA WALKER, Appellants V. WILLIAM RALPH LAYNE WALKER A/K/A LAYNE WALKER, CYNTHIA WALKER, AND WALTLEY RENTALS, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston
Josselyn Rodriguez-Solis v. Todd Blanchepublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1937 Doc: 52 Filed: 05/21/2026 Pg: 1 of 43 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1937 JOSSELYN GABRIELA RODRIGUEZ-SOLIS, Petitioner, v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General, Resp
United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-50146 v. D.C. No. JORGE RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, CR-02-02456-MJL Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-50147 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
Cuesta-Rodriguez v. Statepublic domain
2010 OK CR 23 CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee. No. D-2007-825. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Decided: October 12, 2010. Catherine Hammarsten, Cynthia Viol, Assistant Public Defenders, 320 Robert S. Kerr, Suite 611, Oklahoma City, OK 73102, Attorneys for Defendant. Andrea Digilio Miller, Assistant Public Defender, Ok
Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Parkpublic domain
Present: All the Justices CECILIA RODRIGUEZ, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF UBALDO RODRIGUEZ OPINION BY v. Record No. 122029 CHIEF JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER FEBRUARY 27, 2014 LEESBURG BUSINESS PARK, LLC, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY James H. Chamblin, Judge The circuit court sustained a plea in bar and dismissed this wrongful death action o
Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Parkpublic domain
Present: All the Justices CECILIA RODRIGUEZ, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF UBALDO RODRIGUEZ OPINION BY v. Record No. 122029 CHIEF JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER FEBRUARY 27, 2014 LEESBURG BUSINESS PARK, LLC, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY James H. Chamblin, Judge The circuit court sustained a plea in bar and dismissed this wrongful death action o
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00642-CV David RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. Richard R. STORM, Jr.; H-E-B, LP; Law Office of Shelton & Valadez; Mark A. Giltner; William Tate; and Stephen Martinez,
T.M.H. v. D.M.T.public domain
LAWSON, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that binding legal precedent and the statutes we must follow permit the result reached by the majority. In explaining my reasons for reaching this conclusion, I will first discuss legal principles about which the majority and I seem to agree. The majority dismisses the cases setting forth these principles as distinguishable, and I generally
Cynthia Lee Tucker v. Troy William Tuckerpublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00056-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CYNTHIA LEE TUCKER, Appellant, v. TROY WILLIAM TUCKER, Appellee. On appeal from the 267th District Court