⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Williams v. CACH LLC”

Cach, LLC v. Echolspublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 3× · 2016 Ark. 446; 506 S.W.3d 217; 2016 Ark. LEXIS 372
ROBIN F. WYNNE, Associate Justice 11 This is an interlocutory appeal of the Clark County Circuit Court’s order granting class certification. An order granting or denying a motion for class certification is immediately appealable to this court under Rule 2(a)(9) of the Arkansas Rule's of Appellate Procedure-Civil (2016). We affirm the circuit court’s order
Swain v. CACH, LLCpublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2009-11-04 · Published · cited 1× · 699 F. Supp. 2d 1109; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126340; 2009 WL 6305286
699 F.Supp.2d 1109 (2009) Juanita SWAIN, Plaintiff, v. CACH, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. C 08-05562 JW. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. November 4, 2009. *1110 Scott C. Maurer, San Jose, CA, William Eric Kennedy, Law Offices of William E. Kennedy, Santa Clara, CA, Eric Wayne Wright, Law Offices
Swain v. CACH, LLCpublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2009-07-16 · Published · cited 9× · 699 F. Supp. 2d 1117; 2009 WL 6325531; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126341
699 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2009) Juanita SWAIN, Plaintiff, v. CACH, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. C 08-05562 JW. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. July 16, 2009. *1118 Scott C. Maurer, San Jose, CA, William Eric Kennedy, Law Offices of William E. Kennedy, Santa Clara, CA, Eric Wayne Wright, Law Offices of
Wirth v. CACH, LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009-10-15 · Published · cited 29× · 685 S.E.2d 433; 300 Ga. App. 488; 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3385; 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 1200
685 S.E.2d 433 (2009) 300 Ga. App. 488 WIRTH v. CACH, LLC. No. A09A1270. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 15, 2009. *434 William R. Carlisle, Sugar Hill, for appellant. Fred J. Hanna, James T. Freaney, for appellee. MILLER, Chief Judge. In this action on an open account, we granted
Cach, LLC v. Khanpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-11-25 · Published · cited 1× · 188 A.D.3d 1135; 132 N.Y.S.3d 794; 2020 NY Slip Op 07025
Cach, LLC v Khan (2020 NY Slip Op 07025) Cach, LLC v Khan 2020 NY Slip Op 07025 Decided on November 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
Cach, LLC v. Aspirpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-03-23 · Published · cited 3× · 137 A.D.3d 1065; 29 N.Y.S.3d 36
In an action to recover the outstanding balance due on a credit card, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), entered April 17, 2015, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint and denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Riding v. Cach LLCpublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2014-01-17 · Published · cited 4× · 992 F. Supp. 2d 987; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6518; 2014 WL 198764
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS CACH LLC AND MANDARICH LAW GROUP LLP’S MOTION TO DISMISS [24] RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge. Currently before the Court is Defendant Cach LLC’s (“Defendant Cach”) and Defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLP’s (“Defendant Mandarich,” collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss [24]. The Court, having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to this Motion, NOW FINDS AND RULES
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-08-23 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Aug 23 2016, 9:33 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals court except for the purpose of establishing
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012-08-24 · Published · cited 14× · 55 A.3d 344; 2012 WL 3631484; 2012 Del. LEXIS 451
STEELE, Chief Justice: The New Castle County Sheriff sold real property encumbered with a judgment lien and a mortgage lien, in that order of priority, at a mandated sheriffs sale. The Sheriff disbursed the proceeds to Eastern Savings Bank, the mortgage lien holder. CACH, LLC, the judgment lien holder, filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas alleging misappropriation and unjust enrichment. The Court of Common Pleas jud
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-07-03 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 Ohio 5672
[Cite as CACH, L.L.C. v. Donohue, 2017-Ohio-5672.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY CACH, LLC, : CASE NO. CA2016-09-083 Plaintiff-Appellee, : OPINION
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-06-29 · Published · cited 9× · 2017 Ohio 5597
[Cite as CACH, L.L.C. v. Alderman, 2017-Ohio-5597.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CACH, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 15AP-980 v. : (C.P.C. No. 14CV-1926) Timothy L. Alderman, :
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-12-20 · Published · cited 5× · 2022 Ohio 4590
[Cite as U.S. Bank v. Williams, 2022-Ohio-4590.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT U.S. Bank Trust National Association as : Trustee of the Lodge Series III Trust, : Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 21AP-576 : (C.P.C. No. 19CV-7085) v.
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011-05-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2011 UT App 149; 257 P.3d 435; 2011 WL 1796427
257 P.3d 435 (2011) 2011 UT App 149 COLONIAL BUILDING SUPPLY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC., dba KRT Drywall; Bud Bailey Construction, Inc.; Layton Pointe, LC; and John Does 1-10, Defendants. Bud Bailey Construction, Inc., Cross-claimant, Third-party Plaintiff, and Appellee, v. Construction Associates, Inc., separately and dba KRT Drywall; and William Kim Pitcher, Cross-claim Defendants and T
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 21-1998 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1998 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022-05-11 · Published · cited 14× · 33 F.4th 1326
Case: 21-1998 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1998 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2008-12-04 · Published · cited 1× · 2008 UT App 436; 198 P.3d 1017; 618 Utah Adv. Rep. 15; 2008 Utah App. LEXIS 433; 2008 WL 5084575
2008 UT App 436 Colonial Building Supply, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Construction Associates, Inc., separately and dba KRT Drywall; Bud Bailey Construction, Inc.; Layton Pointe, LC; and John Does I-X, Defendants. Bud Bailey Construction, Inc., Cross-claimant, Third-party Plaintiff, and Appellee, v. Construction Associates, Inc. separately and dba KRT Drywall; and William Kim Pitcher, Cross-claim Defendants and Third-party Defendant, Cache
Wright v. SLWM, LLCpublic domain
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JEFFREY WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-1339-JTL ) SLWM, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION G
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2018-07-19 · Published · cited 25× · 315 F. Supp. 3d 933
RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Google LLC's ("Google") Second Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 for Improper Venue. (Dkt. No. 125) ("the Motion"). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be D
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-03-10 · Published · cited 3× · 130 F.4th 623
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1627 CHARLES BICH and BRUNO BICH TRUST, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WW3 LLC and CURT D. WALDVOGEL, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE: SUBPOENA OF INTERNET No. 24-3978 SUBSCRIBERS OF COX D.C. No. COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 1:23-cv-00426- AND COXCOM, LLC JMS-WRP ______________________________ CAPSTONE STUDIOS CORP.; MILLENNIUM FUNDING, INC.; OPINION VOLTAGE HOLDINGS, LLC