Cases

MOORE, Judge. Troy T. Williams appeals from a February 3, 2014, judgment of the Madison Circuit Court (“the circuit court”) dismissing *5his appeal from a judgment of the Madison* District Court (“the district court”) in favor of Capital ■ One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Capital One”), and Capital One’s collection agency, Holloway & Moxley, L.L.P. (“Holloway”).1<

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RIYAN WILLIAMS, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 24-2032 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 5 : CAPITAL ON

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Karen Smith filed for bankruptcy. During the course of the bankruptcy proceedings, defendant-appel-lee Capital One Bank USA, N.A. (“Capital One”), represented by defendant-appellee Kohn Law Firm S.C. (“Kohn”), filed suit against Smith’s husband to collect on a credit card debt he owed. Appellant Smith initiated an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, alleging that appellees ha

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the bankruptcy court granting summary judgment to the debtor on the issue of whether Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., and its law firm, Kohn Law Firm, S.C., violated the co-debtor stay by filing a lawsuit against the debtor’s husband in connection with the husband’s credit card account.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE CUNNINGHAM “One of the basic principles, one of the glories, of the American system of justice is that the cotirthouse door is open to everyone—the humblest 'citizen, the indigent, the convicted felon, the illegal alien.” N.A.A.C.P. v. Meese, 615 F.Supp. 200, 205-06 (D.D.C.1985). We granted discretionary review óf this case to address/the prevalence of

Miller, Presiding Judge. Capital One Bank (USA), N. A. (“the Bank”) filed suit against John B. Grot to recover an unpaid debt on an open account. Grot, appearing pro se, filed a “Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration.” The trial court denied the motion to dismiss, but entered an order staying the suit and granting Grot’s unopposed motion to compel arbitration. The stay order, however, was subsequently vacated when arbitra

JOHN A. HOUSTON, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court are Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.'s ("Defendant" or *1142"Capital One") Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC') pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc.

FILED Oct 10 2019, 6:47 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

[Cite as Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. King, 2015-Ohio-3600.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. : JUDGES: : : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant

524 F.3d 217 (2008) Robert ROSS, Andrea Kune, Woodrow Clark III, Herve Senequier, S. Byron Balbach Jr., Matthew Grabell, Paul Impellezzeri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (USA), Capital One Bank, Capital One F.S.B., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Chase Bank USA, N.A., Citigroup, Inc., Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citibank, USA N.A., Citicorp Diners Club Inc., Universal Ba

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield’s Report and Recommendation [32] (“R & R”) recommending that Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss [16] be denied and that Plaintiff Keith Davidson (“Plaintiff’) be given twenty days after the date of the Court’s order to ren

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-2043 Filed November 25, 2015 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RANDY TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Hancock County, Paul Riffel, Judge. Randy Taylor appeals the district court’s summary judgment decision denying his

Capital One, N.A. v Trubitsky (2022 NY Slip Op 03492) Capital One, N.A. v Trubitsky 2022 NY Slip Op 03492 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Buchwald Capital Advisors LLC (the “Trustee”) appeals from a judgment entered September 30, 2012 by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sullivan, J.), affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court (Bernstein, J.). The Trustee argues that the courts below erred in granting in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the Trustee’s assorted fraudulent conv

CHRISTOPHER LEE * NO. 2022-CA-0091 WILLIAMS * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL FOURTH CIRCUIT ASSOCIATION, CAPITAL * ONE BANK (USA), NATIONAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION, DANIELLE ******* WILLIAMS, RUDY GORRELL, AND KIMI

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Coxall (2025 NY Slip Op 03557) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Coxall 2025 NY Slip Op 03557 Decided on June 11, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

(2008) CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Darrell V. McGRAW, Jr., Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-00165. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. June 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, Chief Judge. Pending before the court is the defendant's Motion to Dismiss. For rea

Zittman v HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (2024 NY Slip Op 01125) Zittman v HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 2024 NY Slip Op 01125 Decided on February 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

Zittman v HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (2024 NY Slip Op 01125) Zittman v HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 2024 NY Slip Op 01125 Decided on February 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Dein, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case arises out of the efforts of the plaintiff, Mehdi Hosseini (“Hosseini”), to avoid the foreclosure of his home by obtaining a mortgage loan modification from the defendant, Capital One, N.A. (“Capital One”)