Cases

2023 WI 49 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP809-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Junior L. Williams-Holmes, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

2023 WI 49 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP809-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Junior L. Williams-Holmes, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

2022 WI App 38 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2021AP809-CR Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JUNIOR L. WILLIAMS-HOLMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Opinion Filed: June 15, 2022 Submitted on Briefs: March

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

774 F.2d 1158 * Williamsv.Holmes 84-3733 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. 9/16/85 1 E.D.La. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

959 A.2d 320 (2008) HOLMES v. WILLIAMS. No. 174 EAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. October 8, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Gants, J. Under the Alimony Reform Act of 2011, St. 2011, c. 124 (reform act), “[i]f the length of the marriage is [twenty] years or less, but more than [fifteen] years, general term alimony shall continue for not more than [eighty] per cent of the number of months of the marriage” unless the judge makes a written finding that deviation beyond this time limit is required in the interest of justice. G. L. c. 208, § 49 (b)

MEMORANDUM OPINION Arthur B. Federman, Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff Katie McClammer filed this adversary proceeding seeking a determination that an alleged debt owed to her by Debtor-Defendant Landon Reser Holmes is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) as a debt incurred by actual fraud. For the reasons that follow, judgment will be entered in favor of Ms. McClammer, but only as to the amount she a

LOCKEMY, J. In this appeal from the family court, Robin Holmes (Husband) appeals the family court order requiring he pay Rita Kay Holmes (Wife) $600 per month in alimony. We affirm as modified. FACTS/PROCEDXJRAL BACKGROUND Husband and Wife.were married in 1978 and had two children. The parties separated in 2006, and on October 5, 2007, the family court found Wife was entitled to a divorce

OPINION ELSA ALCALA, Justice. Appellant, Harold Holmes, appeals a judgment in favor of appellee, Amy Williams, determining and rendering judgment for child-support arrearages, including accrued interest, and ordering that Williams be entitled to issue child-support liens, levies, and writs of income withholding as remedies for the collection of unpaid child

Kimberly Darlene Holmes ("the wife") and Christopher Ray Holmes ("the husband") were divorced by a November 3, 2006, judgment of the trial court. The divorce judgment incorporated a settlement agreement reached by the parties. Pursuant to the divorce judgment, the parties were awarded joint legal custody of their two minor children, and the wife was awarded primary physical custody. The husband was awarded visitation with the children, and he was ordered to pay monthly child support.

SUMMARY ORDER Creditor-Appellant Williams Holmes (“Holmes”), proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Holmes’s adversary proceeding. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the ease, and the issues on appeal. “The rulings of a district court acting as an appellate court in a bankruptcy case a

ROSENTHAL, District Judge: This is an appeal from the dismissal of a declaratory judgment suit filed in federal court. Plaintiff, Sherwin-Williams Company, sought a declaratory judgment in federal court as to certain issues relating to its liability to the Mississippi school districts and counties named as defendants for the cost of lead paint abatement. The district court conclud

RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge. |, Jarrod Holmes pleaded guilty to three drug crimes. He tried to withdraw his plea after the court denied his motion to exclude evidence of the crime during jury sentencing. He now appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw and the denial of his motion to exclude the evidence. We affirm and hold that the circuit court did not abu

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

MOORE, J. hThe defendant, Paul Edward Holmes, pled guilty to two counts of video voyeurism involving juveniles in exchange for the state’s dismissal of the remaining 15 counts of video voyeurism charged in the bill of information and four counts of pornography involving juveniles.1 There was no agreement as to sentencing. Following a sentencing hearing, the court sentenced the defendant to five y

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff Marlon Holmes (“Holmes”) brought suit several years ago against police officers of the City of Springfield, Massachusetts pursuant to the federal civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for alleged constitutional violations. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion to reopen the case closed in 2010 and defendants’ consolidated oppositio

JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. | ^Defendant, Kevin P. Holmes, appeals his convictions for second degree murder and attempted second degree murder. On appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him, that the trial court erred in denying his motion for severance, and that his sentence for attempted second degree murder was excessive. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences, and

ORDER Federal agents sent an informant to buy drugs from Clevis Holmes on three occasions in March and April 2014. Holmes pleaded guilty to one count each of distributing powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin and was sentenced as a career offender, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, to a total of 188 months’ imprisonment. He filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer, who also represented Holmes in the district court, asserts

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Michael M. Mohun, A.J.), entered May 6, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition pursuant to