Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Williams v. Taylor (INMATE 1)”
Williams v. Taylorpublic domain
Chief Justice Rehnquist, with whom Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas join, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the Court’s interpretation of 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d)(1) (1994 ed., Supp. Ill), see ante, at 402-413 (opinion of O’Connor, J.), but disagree with its decision to grant ha-beas relief in this case. There is “clearly establis
Williams v. Taylorpublic domain
By unpublished order filed 6/13/00, this case -- on remand from the U.S. Supreme Court -- is remanded to the district court. PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT TERRY WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. No. 98-14 JOHN TAYLOR, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, Respondent-Appellant. TERRY WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 98-16 J
Taylor v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Trent Taylor v. Marion Williamspublic domain
Case: 17-10253 Document: 00515246130 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-10253 Fifth Circuit FILED
Taylor v. Williamspublic domain
COX, Circuit Judge, dissenting: My guess is that the Georgia Supreme Court would decide this case the same way today’s court decides it. The result is certainly equitable. A decision to certify a question of state law to the supreme court of that state is a discretionary one, Escareno v. Noltina Crucible & Refractory Corp., 139 F.3d 1456, 1461 (11th Cir.1998), but in my view a proper exercise of our
State v. Taylorpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) ) v. ) I.D. Nos. 1605012921A ) ) DIAMONTE TAYLOR, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Taylor v. McDonoughpublic domain
Case: 19-2211 Document: 104 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRUCE R. TAYLOR, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETER- ANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2019-2211 ______________________ A
United States v. Taylorpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1244 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:95-cr-01094- PA-1 v. DOUGLAS ELIGHA TAYLOR, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States Distric
State v. Taylorpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2023-Ohio-1766.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 29443 : v.
Taylor v. Statepublic domain
315 Ga. 630 FINAL COPY S22A1003. TAYLOR v. THE STATE. WARREN, Justice. After a jury trial in December 2013, Jeremy Gene Taylor was convicted of the malice murder of Earl Bolar and the aggravated battery of Seaborn Roberts.1 Taylor raises five claims of error on appeal: that (1) the trial court abused its discretion by excluding evidence about Taylor’s mental health; (2) the trial court erred by sentencing Taylor based on an inference that Taylor did not acce
Taylor v. McDonoughpublic domain
Case: 19-2211 Document: 104 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRUCE R. TAYLOR, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETER- ANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2019-2211 ______________________ A
State v. Taylorpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2022-Ohio-3579.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case Nos. 29422 and 29423 : v.
State v. Taylorpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2022-Ohio-3611.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-P-0052 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas HENRY TAYLOR, JR.,
Taylor v. Huntleypublic domain
2020 IL App (3d) 180195 Opinion filed July 7, 2020 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2020 JAMAL TAYLOR,
Jimmy L. Taylor v. Statepublic domain
SECOND DIVISION MARKLE, J., LAND and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
Fillmore v. Taylorpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Taylor v. Statepublic domain
Benham, Justice. **277Appellant Davious Letron Taylor appeals his convictions for murder and possession of a weapon during the commission of a crime arising out of the shooting death of Onterio Perez Dorsey.1 **278<
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Taylor, N.public domain
[J-83-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 40 MAP 2022 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at No. 856
Taylor v. Steelepublic domain
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before me upon the petition of Missouri state prisoner Leonard Taylor for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 19). After carefully considering Taylor's petition, Respondent's brief (Doc. 29), the underlying record (Doc. 29, Ex. A-
Williams v. Williamspublic domain
*1320ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA After an independent review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of