Cases

TROTT, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Because I believe that Officer Camou did have probable cause to believe that *671Daniels posed a serious threat of serious injury both to Officer Camou and to others, I would grant summary judgment to the defendants on the ground of qualified immunity. With all respect to my colleagues, Deorle v. Rutherford, 27

OPINION We affirm the judgment finding defendant Teodoso Figueroa Ventura guilty of various narcotics violations. BACKGROUND After arresting defendant in his car and recovering cocaine and heroin, sheriff's deputies served a search warrant on a garage apartment rented by defendant. There they found cocaine, heroin, narcotics paraphernalia, and a book with notations indicating that the location was being used for narcotics transactions.

Opinion PERREN, J. Frederick W. Williamson II is the son of a wealthy Los Angeles patrician family. Through his parents’ generosity, Frederick and his *1307 wife, Mary Kate Williamson, enjoyed a lavish high-society lifestyle during their 20-year marriage.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0043p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - GEORGE G. VE

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00539-CR Ventura Flores, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee<

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00539-CR Ventura Flores, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 99-706-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING Ventura Flores, Jr., seeks to

*787 OPINION PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant George G. Ventura brought this diversity action against The Cincinnati Enquirer and its parent company, Gannett Co. (collectively the “Enquirer”), claiming breach of contract, tortious breach of contract, promissory e

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: Robert Brooks, Karen Hanson, and County of Ventura (together, County) appeal from an order (Order) denying their motion for summary judgment and granting in part Noelle Way’s motion for partial summary judgment. Because we lack appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

*1048 BEA, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant, Ventura Mobile Home Communities Owners Association, contends the district court (1) miscalculated the date on which its claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 accrued and improperly applied the limitations period, (2) erroneously prevented it from asserting

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1018 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1019 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPL

OPINION This venue case arose from a suit brought in Aransas County by The Ventura against Hunter Barrett Company. Ventura, a condominiums regime, sought through injunction to have Barrett, one of the apartment owners, remove a boat dock and fish cleaning stand from a wooden sundeck area which was a part of the common elements of the condominium. Barrett filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Tarrant County, the county of his residence. Ventura controverted the plea

Petition for writ of mandate directing and compelling respondent, as assessor of the county of Ventura, to pay to H.R. Vandelinder, as treasurer of said county, the sum of $8.85 now retained by said respondent for his own use, as six per cent of the sum of $147.60 collected by him as taxes on unsecured personal property within the said county belonging to Star Petroleum Company, a corporation. [1] The question is whether or not respondent, as assessor of Ventura County

882 F.2d 1398 SINALOA LAKE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,v.CITY OF SIMI VALLEY, Defendant/Appellee,James Doody, et al., Defendants-cross-defendants/Appellees.v.Donald G. TUDOR; Jennie P. Tudor, et al.,Third-party-defendants/Appellees,County of Ventura, Defendant-third-party-plaintiff/cross-claimant. No. 86-6425. United States Court of Appeals,Nin

864 F.2d 1475 SINALOA LAKE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,v.CITY OF SIMI VALLEY, Defendant/Appellee,James DOODY, et al., Defendants-cross-defendants/Appellees.v.Donald G. TUDOR; Jennie P. Tudor, et al.,Third-party-defendants/Appellees,County of Ventura, Defendant-third-party-plaintiff/cross-claimant. No. 86-6425. United States Court of Appeals,Nin

MEMORANDUM * Frances L. Diaz appeals the district court’s denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Diaz is an attorney who was included in a judgment awarding attorneys’ fees and costs to her client’s opponent pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 425.16. Diaz failed to pay the judgment and refused to submit to a judgment debtor exam, for which the trial court held her

Opinion TURNER, P. J. I. Introduction Ventura Martinez (defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, *1515in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a). Defendant admitted he was previously convicted of a serious felon

OPINION Julie Gavina Satz was convicted by plea of possessing methamphetamine. (Health Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) She appeals, contending that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress the evidence. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.)1 We affirm. Facts Appellant used a stolen credit card number to register as a

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 104 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 105 OPINION No reported California case has ever said that a battery can be committed with "criminal neglige

OPINION Amby Gary Owens entered a no contest plea to a felony charge of operating an endless chain scheme. (Pen. Code, § 327.) In the exercise of its sound discretion, the trial court declared the conviction to be a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code, § 17, subd. (b).) He appeals contending that he was the subject of an invidious discrimination because the prosecutor's decision to charge him with a felony was m

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 497 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 498 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT