⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Willie Balle v. David Kennedy”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023-07-14 · Published · cited 58× · 73 F.4th 545
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2393 WILLIE BALLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID KENNEDY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2014-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRM, MODIFY, REVERSE and REMAND; Opinion Filed April 9, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01377-CV DAVID W. NOELL, Appellant/Intevenor V. CITY OF CARROLLTON AND CARROLLTON PROPERTY STANDARDS BOARD, Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973-03-05 · Published · cited 354× · 472 F.2d 340
472 F.2d 340 22 A.L.R.Fed. 159 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David T. DELLINGER et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 18295. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Feb. 8, 1972.Decided Nov. 21, 1972.Certiorari Denied March 5, 1973.See 93 S.Ct. 1443.
New York Court of Chancery · 1921-12-07 · Published · cited 0× · 13 Del. Ch. 93; 115 A. 585; 1921 Del. Ch. LEXIS 28
The Chancellor. The complainants ask leave to amend by filing an amended bill of complaint as a substitute for the original bill heretofore filed. The defendants object to the granting of the leave because, they contend, the original bill is so defective in the signatures thereto and in the vertification thereof, and in the prayer for ultimate relief, that there cannot be said to be any bill before the court and, therefore, there
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet
Tiner v. Premopublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017-03-01 · Published · cited 12× · 284 Or. App. 59; 391 P.3d 816; 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 277
ARMSTRONG, P. J. Petitioner was found guilty by a jury of two counts of aggravated murder, one count of intentional murder, and a number of other crimes. He sought post-conviction relief on a variety of claims. The post-conviction court denied relief on all of petitioner’s claims involving the guilt phase of petitioner’s criminal trial but granted relief on his penalty-phase claims and voided the imposition of the death penalty.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004-08-13 · Published · cited 79× · 599 S.E.2d 508; 358 N.C. 701; 2004 N.C. LEXIS 915
599 S.E.2d 508 (2004) 358 N.C. 701 Willie B. JOHNSON, Employee v. SOUTHERN TIRE SALES AND SERVICE, Employer, Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, Carrier. No. 514A02. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 13, 2004. *510 Schiller & Schiller PLLC, by Marvin Schiller and David G. Schiller, Raleigh, for pla
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 97 F. App'x 305
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Willis v. Palmerpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2016-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 175 F. Supp. 3d 1081; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42162; 2016 WL 1267766
*1085MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.. .1085 A. Procedural History ... 1085 B. Factual Findings... 1087
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002-08-20 · Published · cited 3× · 567 S.E.2d 773; 152 N.C. App. 323; 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 920
567 S.E.2d 773 (2002) Willie B. JOHNSON, Employee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SOUTHERN TIRE SALES AND SERVICE, Employer, Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, Carrier, Defendant-Appellants. No. COA01-917. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 20, 2002. *775 Schiller Law Firm, L.L.P., by Marvin Schiller and David G. Schiller, Cary, f
Gayle v. Johnsonpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015-01-28 · Published · cited 4× · 81 F. Supp. 3d 371; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9630; 2015 WL 351669
OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge: This putative class action challenges the constitutionality of detention procedures related to mandatory detention of aliens under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), codified as the' Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). Putative class representatives Garfield O. Gayle (“Gayle”) and Neville Sukhu (“Suk-hu”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Named Plaintiffs”) aver that they and other si
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-06-27 · Published · cited 242× · 588 U.S. 684; 139 S. Ct. 2484; 204 L. Ed. 2d 931; 2019 U.S. LEXIS 4401
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2491 Voters and other plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland challenged their States' congressional districting maps as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. The North Carolina plaintiffs complained that the State's distric
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 406 S.C. 13; 749 S.E.2d 126; 2013 WL 4451075; 2013 S.C. App. LEXIS 207
FEW, C.J. Scott Lawing suffered severe burns over almost half his body when a large amount of a highly-flammable chemical caught fire at his jobsite. He brought a products liability lawsuit against several entities in the supply chain for the chemical. After a six-week jury trial, the trial court awarded substantial damages to Lawing and two of his co-workers. Lawing nevertheless appeals, arguing the trial court made two errone
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
[J-6-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 32 EM 2023 : : On King’s Bench petition from the v. : order
People v. Ngpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2022-07-28 · Published · cited 64× · 13 Cal. 5th 448; 513 P.3d 858; 296 Cal. Rptr. 3d 225
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLES CHITAT NG, Defendant and Appellant. S080276 Orange County Superior Court 94ZF0195 July 28, 2022 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Je
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990-08-06 · Published · cited 6× · 910 F.2d 130; 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3192; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 13385
910 F.2d 130 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3192, 59 USLW 2167,116 Lab.Cas. P 10,264 WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA;Richard L. Trumka, President; District 28, UMWA; JackieStump, President; Don McCamey, Acting President andSecretary/Treasurer; Sam Church, Field Representative;Roger Tomlinson, Field Representative; Local Union
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014-04-09 · Published · cited 5× · 431 S.W.3d 682; 2014 WL 2119045
OPINION Opinion by Justice O’NEILL. This dispute concerns claims by homeowners in a residential “airpark” community against a real estate developer, the zoning committee of the airpark community, and the City of Carrollton in connection with actions that resulted in the City ordering the airpark’s airport closed. Appellees Air Park Common Area Preservation Association, Inc
Broyles v. Texaspublic domain
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009-03-31 · Published · cited 16× · 618 F. Supp. 2d 661; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27508; 2009 WL 959451
618 F.Supp.2d 661 (2009) David K. BROYLES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of TEXAS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-08-02320. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2009. *666 Robert L. Bernard, Attorney at Law, Fulshear, TX, for Plaintiff. Joe Wilson Cox, Mary Elizabeth Reveles, Randall
Caucus v. Alabamapublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013-08-02 · Published · cited 1× · 988 F. Supp. 2d 1285
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM H. PRYOR JR., Circuit Judge Presiding. On April 3, 2013, 2013 WL 1397139, the State of Alabama and Beth Chapman, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Alabama, filed a motion for a partial summary judgment against count three of the amended complaint of the Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, Bobby Singleton, the Alabama Association of Black County