Cases

AMENDED SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision. Toward that end, we note that defendant ImageSat is in the business of commercializing Israeli military earth observation satellite technology. Its two larg

AMENDED SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision. Toward that end, we note that defendant ImageSat is in the business of commercializing Israeli military earth observation satellite technology. Its two larg

Andreas, J. (dissenting). Under the particular circumstances before us, Supreme Court did not exceed its authority and providently exercised its discretion when it dismissed both the action and third-party action on forum non conveniens grounds. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. Plaintiff, a United Arab Emirates (UAE) bank, is headquartered in Dubai and has a branch in New York. In 2009, it brought this action a

Andreas, J. (dissenting). Under the particular circumstances before us, Supreme Court did not exceed its authority and providently exercised its discretion when it dismissed both the action and third-party action on forum non conveniens grounds. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. Plaintiff, a United Arab Emirates (UAE) bank, is headquartered in Dubai and has a branch in New York. In 2009, it brought this action a

698 F.Supp.2d 386 (2010) KITARU INNOVATIONS INC., Plaintiff, v. Ashok CHANDARIA and Sachen Chandaria, Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 3602(PGG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 23, 2010. *388 John Dellaportas, Duane Morris, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Ian Gregg Dibernardo, Jason Sobel, Stroock & Strooc

710 F.Supp.2d 328 (2008) Zohar NIV, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Decedent Tzila Niv and his minor children Decedents Gilad Niv and Lior Niv, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION and Hilton International Co., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 7839 (PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 10, 2008.

Paul G. Gardephe, United States District Judge In this action, Mindspirit, LLC, and its two members - Malvika Kumar and Rosewood Partners - allege that Defendant Evalueserve Ltd. breached an agreement to issue 480,000 Evalueserve stock options to Mindspirit. According to Plaintiffs, although Evalueserve issued these options to Mindspirit in April 2001, it later breached the parties' agreement by wrongfully re-issuing these stock opt

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: Plaintiffs Matías Erausquin, Enrique Erausquin, Liliana Controne, and Yolanda Frischknecht bring this putative class action against Defendants Notz, Stucki Management (Bermuda) Limited (“Notz Stucki Bermuda”), Notz, Stucki & Cie S.A. (“Notz Stucki & Cie” and with Notz Stucki Bermuda, the “Notz Stucki Defendants”), UBS