Cases

Justice PLEICONES, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from that part of the opinion that finds S.C.Code Ann. § 1-7-330 (2005) unconstitutional. As explained below, the constitutionality of the statute is not before us. It is axiomatic that this Court will not address a constitutional issue unless it is necessary to a resolution of the case. E.g., S.C. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. Cochran,

LOLLEY, J. |! Kevin Paul Langford appeals a judgment by the Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Bienville, State of Louisiana, regarding custody and support of his minor child with Elizabeth Brooke Sims Langford, as well as the award of interim spousal support. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. Facts Kev

This is a divorce case arising out of Baldwin County, Alabama. Appellant Henry R. Langford (husband) and appellee Deborah Kay Langford (wife) were married in February 1976. Two children were born of this marriage; Melissa, age five and one-half years and Joshua, age seventeen months at the time of the trial in July 1982. The parties separated in July 1981 because of an "irrevocable" breakdown of their marriage. At the time of the trial the wife had custody of the children and w

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER Lawrence E. Kahn, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Jason James Clapper (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he seeks prior custody credit for the period from September 8, 2011 to October 18, 2012. Dkt. Nos. 1 (“Petition”); 1-1 (“Exhibits”).1 Respondent oppo

Reese, J. delivered the opinion of the court. The complainants were the sureties of one Geo. W. Wilson in a bill single, given by him to the defendant, for a sum of money borrowed; and they seek to be discharged upon the ground, that the defendant and the said George W. Wilson, the principal debtor, after the bill single fell due, made an agreement for further delay, upon the consideration, that the s

Reese, J. delivered the opinion of the court. The complainants were the sureties of one Geo. W. Wilson in a bill single, given by him to the defendant, for a sum of money borrowed; and they seek to be discharged upon the ground, that the defendant and the said George W. Wilson, the principal debtor, after the bill single fell due, made an agreement for further delay, upon the consideration, that the s

Reese, J. delivered the opinion of the court. The complainants were the sureties of one Geo. W. Wilson in a bill single, given by him to the defendant, for a sum of money borrowed; and they seek to be discharged upon the ground, that the defendant and the said George W. Wilson, the principal debtor, after the bill single fell due, made an agreement for further delay, upon the consideration, that the s

WILSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their civil RICO claim against Rite Aid of Alabama, Inc., in which plaintiffs argued that Rite Aid had implemented a scheme to defraud its uninsured consumers of prescription medication by charging them higher prices for medication than it charged its insured customers, and failing to disclose this f

USCA4 Appeal: 24-7118 Doc: 38 Filed: 07/02/2026 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-7118 K.C. LANGFORD, Petitioner – Appellee, v. WARDEN DONNIE STONEBREAKER, Warden, Evans Correctional Instituti

04/22/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 2, 2025 LANGFORD FARMS COMMON FACILITIES ASSOCIATION, INC. V. PAUL A. CLARK Appeal from the Chancery Court for Wilson County No. 2024-CV-9 Charles K. Smith, Chancellor

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JULY 1997 SESSION STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. 02-C-01-9703-CR-00099 ) APPELLEE, ) Shelby County ) v. ) Arthur T. Bennett, Judge ) GEORGE LANGFORD, ) (First Degree Felony Mur

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Dec 11 2018, 9:27 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral

CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge. Joe Langford and James Ferguson appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint filed pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of the district court. I. Appellants Langford

670 F.Supp.2d 1213 (2009) Norman Joe LANGFORD, Plaintiff, v. GRADY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants. Case No. CIV-08-0389-F. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. November 17, 2009. *1218 Norman Joe Langford, Lawton, OK, pro se. Chris J. Collins, Eric D. Cotton, Stephen L. Geries, Collins Zorn Jones &

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 6, 2007 GEORGE LANGFORD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 95-06078 Carolyn Wade Blackett, Judge No. W2006-02765-CCA-R3-PC - Filed April 7, 2008 Petitioner, George Langford, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of hi

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 14, 2012 Session BETTY JEAN LANGFORD v. JAMES HARVEY HARRISON, JR. ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bedford County No. 27865 J.B. Cox, Chancellor No. M2011-01647-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 10, 2012 Following appellant’s petition to eject from real property, appellees counterclaimed seeking a

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge, concurring: While I doubt Langford has effectually presented any infringement of First Amendment claim, I concur in the result reached. There is ample evidence supporting the award of summary judgment that Langford was discharged for insubordination and inability to work cooperatively in the nursing home work environment. I, accordingly, concur in affirming.

994 S.W.2d 126 (1999) STATE of Tennessee, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. George LANGFORD, Defendant/Appellant. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. June 1, 1999. W. Mark Ward, Assistant Shelby County Public Defender, Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Jr., Shelby County Public Defender, Memphis, for Defendant/Appellant. John Knox Walkup, Attorney General & Reporter, Michael E. Moore, Soli

DISSENTING OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING RENFRO, Justice (dissenting). But for the generosity, foresight and business acumen of appellant’s grandfather, there would have been no trust for appellant. Under the management of appellant’s grandfather and Uncle, trustees, the trust grew from a value of a few thousand dollars at the time of its creation to a sizeable fortune by the

29 Kan. App.2d 268 (2000) 31 P.3d 290 SALON ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. TOPAZE LANGFORD, Appellee. No. 84,135.[1] Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed December 29, 2000. Thomas Kelly Ryan, of Gates, Biles, Shields & Ryan, P.A., of Overland Park, for the appellant. *269