Cases

706 F.Supp.2d 458 (2010) Robert KALFUS, Plaintiff, v. The NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL; Special Patrolman Sergeant Steven Rodriguez; Special Patrolman Arnold Palmer; Special Patrolmen John Does # 1-4; the City of New York; Lieutenant Eugene Whyte; New York City Police Officers John Does # 5-8, Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 11455(DAB). United States District Court, S.D. New York.

POGUE, Judge: This is an appeal from an order by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing the complaint in each of four cases: Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Inc., No. 10 Civ. 2661; Yarus v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., No. 10 Civ. 2662; Megginson v. West

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. Plaintiff Laura Russo brought the above-captioned action against Defendants New York Presbyterian Hospital (“Presbyterian Hospital”), New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens (“Queens Medical Center”), and Dr. Mark Adkins (“Adkins”), alleging claims of hostile work environment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

OPINION AND ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: Before the Court is New York and Presbyterian Hospital’s (the “Hospital”) Motion to Dismiss the complaints filed in two cases, which have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes. Drs. Henry Earle Childers, IV and George Bino Rucker, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (the “Childers Plaintiffs”), brought the first action a

JAMES S. GETTY, Judge, Specially Assigned, dissenting. Respectfully, I disagree. The majority, by affirming the decision of the trial court, necessarily concludes that Presbyterian University Hospital had sufficient contacts with the State of Maryland to justify Maryland’s assumption of personal jurisdiction over this negligence action for wrongful death.

Knight v New York & Presbyt. Hosp. (2024 NY Slip Op 05870) Knight v New York & Presbyt. Hosp. 2024 NY Slip Op 05870 Decided on November 25, 2024 Court of Appeals Garcia, J. Published by New York St

Docket No. 99507. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS JAMES M. YORK, M.D., et al., Appellees, v. RUSH- PRESBYTERIAN-ST. LUKE=S MEDICAL CENTER et al. (Rush- Presbyterian-St. Luke=s Medical Center, Appellant). Opinion filed June 22, 2006. JUSTICE McMORROW delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fit

688 F.Supp.2d 317 (2010) Harbans KAUR, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION (A.K.A. Harlem Hospital), Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 6175(LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2010. *321 Walker Green Harman, Jr., The Harman Firm PC, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

JUSTICE McMORROW delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, Kilbride, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Garman dissented, with opinion. OPINION Dr. James M. York suffered a spinal

Barrett v New York Presbyt. Hosp.-N.Y. Weill Cornell Med. Ctr. (2025 NY Slip Op 00783) Barrett v New York Presbyt. Hosp.-N.Y. Weill Cornell Med. Ctr. 2025 NY Slip Op 00783 Decided on February 11, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Pu

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Edward Weber brought the above-captioned action against Defendants City of New York (the “City”), the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”), Principal Lashawn Robinson (“Robinson”) and Assistant Principals Lana Phillips (“Phillips”) and Katwona Warren (“Warren”) of Brownsville Academy High School (“Brownsville Academy”), allegi

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Collette Campbell, currently proceeding pro se, brings the above-captioned action against the New York City *155Transit Authority, alleging claims of gender discrimination, age discrimination, disability discrimination, failure to accommo-. date, retaliation and c

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Sylvia Bowen-Hooks brings the above-captioned action against Defendants City of New York, Commissioner David Frankel, Sheriff Lindsay Eason, Chief of Operations Timothy LaRose, First Deputy Sheriff Oliver Pu-Folkes and Chief of Staff Peter Sammarco, alleging claims of race and gender discrimination, retaliation

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes; before the Court on Defendant Goldman, Sachs & Co.’s Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 30, 2014 (Doc. 27)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on March .5, 2015. The primary issue are: (i) whether Plaintiff Presbyterian Healthcare Services’ claims ‘arise out of its

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: Plaintiff Awad Johnson brings this action after being denied tenure as an intermediary school principal in the New York City public school system. Alleging that his tenure was denied because of his race, Plaintiff asserts claims for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act; the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitut

722 F.Supp.2d 326 (2010) Paul CASSEUS, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON NEW YORK, INC., Defendant. No. 08-CV-4119 (JFB)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 9, 2010. *329 Justin H. Reilly and Neil H. Greenberg, Law Offices of Neil H. Greenberg & Associates, Westbury, NY, for Plaintiff. Martin Warren Aron of Edw

(2008) Oxana Alexandrovna KOULKINA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 11357(SHS)(HBP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2008. ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. On January 23, 2008, Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman issued a thorough 68 page Report and Recom

523 F.Supp.2d 185 (2007) State of NEW YORK, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Town of Southampton, Plaintiffs, v. The SHINNECOCK INDIAN NATION, Frederick C. Bess, Lance A. Gumbs, Randall King, and Karen Hunter, Defendants. Town of Southampton, Plaintiff, v. The Shinnecock Tribe a/k/a the Shinnecock Indian Nation, Frederick C. Bess, Lance A. Gumbs, and Randall King, D

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-3124 ____________ RHONDA H. WILSON; THE LAW OFFICES OF RHONDA HILL WILSON, P.C., Appellants v. USI INSURANCE SERVICE LLC; HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ____________ On Appeal from the

Judge RAGGI dissents, in part, in a separate opinion. KEARSE, Circuit Judge. This case returns to us after proceedings on remand following an appeal in which we, inter alia, reversed district judges’ dismissals as a matter of law, on the ground of qualified immunity, of certain claims brought by plaintiff Robert Kerman under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant William Crossan (styled “ ‘John’ Cros