Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Winston D. Martin”
Winston ex rel. Winston v. City of Chicagopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge - Plaintiffs Kelly Winston,’ Kayla Winston, and Kyla Winston bring this ten-count Amended Complaint alleging violations of their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, negligence, willful and wanton conduct, breach of duty to train and supervise *1220and <
United States v. James Winston Hayespublic domain
JORDAN, Circuit Judge:. “Corruption,” Edward Gibbon wrote more than two centuries ago, is “the most infallible symptom of constitutional liberty.” EdwaRd Gibbon, The HistoRY of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol. II, Ch. XXI, at 805 (David Womersley ed., Penguin Classics 1995) [1781]. And so, although unfortunate, it is perhaps not surprising that, even today, people continue to pay bribes to government official
Winston v. VERIZON SERVICES CORP.public domain
633 F.Supp.2d 42 (2009) Robin WINSTON, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON SERVICES CORP., Defendant. No. 08 Civ. 4072(PKC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 16, 2009. *44 Nils C. Shillito, Stephen D. Hans & Associates, P.C., Stephen D. Hans, Stephen D. Hans & Associates, P.C(LIC), Long Island City, NY, for Plaintiff.<
City of Winston-Salem v. Slatepublic domain
647 S.E.2d 643 (2007) CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Plaintiff, v. Douglas A. SLATE and wife, Shirley Slate, Defendants. City of Winston-Salem, Plaintiff, v. Gary M. Slate and wife, Denise Slate; Douglas A. Slate and wife, Shirley Slate; Pamela S. Kennedy and husband, Rick Kennedy; and R. Kenneth Babb, Administrator, Defendants. Nos. COA06-1015, COA06-1161. Court of Appeals of North Carolina.</
Winston v. Stewart Title & Guaranty Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge. Plaintiff DeAngela Winston (“Ms. Winston”) has brought this action, on behalf of herself and a similarly situated class of plaintiffs (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), *633against defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company (“Stewart”). The complaint alleges that Stewart overcharged her and oth
Martin v. City of College Parkpublic domain
DOYLE, Chief Judge. In a suit alleging violations of the Georgia Open Meetings Act (“OMA”), 1 Chawanda Martin appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the City of College Park (“City”). Martin contends that the trial court erred by ruling that her suit was not filed in accordance with the time limits prescribed in
Martin Hayes v. City of Plummerpublic domain
BURDICK, Justice. This case concerns an appeal from the Kootenai County Distinct Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent City of Plummer on Martin and Lynn Hayes’s premises liability claims. The district court ruled that Idaho’s Recreational Use Statute, Idaho Code section 36-1604, provided limited liability protect
Martin v. Howard Universitypublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was briefed and argued by counsel. It is Ordered and Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this dispositi
C.D.S., Inc. v. Zetlerpublic domain
*715DECISION AND ORDER Victor Marrero, United States District Judge. Plaintiff C.D.S., Inc. (“C.D.S.”) commenced this action against defendants Bradley Zetler (“Zetler”), CDS, LLC, and Rapid Systems CC (collectively with Zetler and CDS, LLC, “Rapid Systems”) alleging in its complaint (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1) various violations of state and federal la
United States v. G. Martin Wynnpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge FLOYD joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: G. Martin Wynn, a professional engineer with the engineering firm of Talbert & Bright, Inc., was convicted of mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§
State v. J.D.H.public domain
*565Order PER CURIAM: J.D.H. appeals his conviction for domestic assault in the second degree, section 565.073. J.D.H. claims that the trial court erred in refusing to admit evidence aimed at impeaching the testimony of the victim. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem Associatespublic domain
PER CURIAM. *343DISCRETIONARY REVIEW AND WRIT OF CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED. Justice Martin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
C.D.S., Inc. v. Zetlerpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. Plaintiff C.D.S., Inc. (“C.D.S.”) commenced this action against defendants Bradley Zetler (“Zetler”), CDS, LLC, and Rapid Systems CC (collectively with Zet-ler and CDS, LLC, “Rapid Systems”) alleging in its complaint (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1.) various violations of state and federal law. Rapid Systems, in its First Amended Answer, Countercla
Thacker v. City of Winston-Salempublic domain
482 S.E.2d 20 (1997) John D. THACKER, Employee/Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Employer/Self-Insured Defendant. No. COA96-680. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 18, 1997. *21 Bennett & Blancato, L.L.P. by Sherry R. Dawson, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant. Randolph M. James, P.C. by Randolph M. James
Winston-Salem Wrecker Ass'n v. Barkerpublic domain
557 S.E.2d 614 (2001) WINSTON-SALEM WRECKER ASSOCIATION, INC., Harvey Davis d/b/a Davis Garage and Body Shop, Dean's Robinhood Gulf, Inc., Fritts Motor Company, Inc., David Grubbs d/b/a Parkway Texaco, Robert R. Mathis d/b/a Ray's Paint & Body Shop and Wrecker Service, A.C. Reynolds, Sr. d/b/a Reynolds Garage & Used Parts, Ronald E. Jones d/b/a Southside Garage Towing, Spaugh Motor Company, Inc. and Steve Venable, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Ron
438 F.3d 595 WOMEN'S MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; Martin Haskell, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.J. Nick BAIRD, M.D., Director of Ohio Department of Health, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-4249. No. 04-3060. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: February 3, 2005. Decided and Filed: Februa
Winston v. Pizza Hutpublic domain
[Cite as Winston v. Pizza Hut, 2022-Ohio-859.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY KELLY WINSTON : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 29265 : v.
Winston v. Martinpublic domain
In re Ronald L. Nichols and Jimmie D. Martin; Defendants; Applying for Reconsideration to this Court’s action dated December 15, 2000; from the 26th Judicial District Court Div. “B” No. C2000-1150B (Parish of Beauregard). Application for reconsideration granted for the sole purpose of amending this Court’s order of December 15, 2000 to read as follows: Application transferred to the Thirty-Sixth Judicial District Court for the Paris
Love-Lane v. Martinpublic domain
201 F.Supp.2d 566 (2002) DeComa LOVE-LANE, Plaintiff, v. Donald MARTIN, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools, and the Winston-Salem Forsyth County Board of Education, Defendants. No. 1:99CV00735. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 26, 2002. *567
Martin v. Wellesley Collegepublic domain
51 F.Supp.2d 32 (1999) Anthony MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. WELLESLEY COLLEGE, Defendant. No. 97-CV-12611-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 2, 1999. Winston Kendall, Boston, MA, for Anthony P. Martin, Plaintiff. William L. Patton, Ana M. Francisco, Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, for Wellesley College, Defendant.