⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Wipe-Out Logistics, LLC”

Texas Supreme Court · 2022-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 20-0393 ══════════ James Fredrick Miles, Petitioner, v. Texas Central Railroad & Infrastructure, Inc. and Integrated Texas Logistics, Inc., Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════
Superior Court of Delaware · 2024-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EARTH PRIDE ORGANICS, LLC and ) LTG, INC. f/k/a LANCASTER FINE ) FOODS, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No.: N23C-05-009-EMD CCLD ) v. ) )
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2018-07-02 · Published · cited 0× · 325 F. Supp. 3d 899
JON E. DEGUILIO, Judge Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. initiated this lawsuit against Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet Manufacturing, LLC (collectively, "Biomet") in the Northern District of Illinois on July 19, 2010, alleging infringement of its patent for "Methods and Apparatus for Femoral and Tibial Resection," U.S. Patent No.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-04-09 · Published · cited 1× · 98 F.4th 314
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 12, 2024 Decided April 9, 2024 No. 23-1029 CP ANCHORAGE HOTEL 2, LLC, D/B/A HILTON ANCHORAGE, PETITIONER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 23-1039 On Petition for Review and Cross-Application
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-02-06 · Published · cited 0× · 114 A.D.3d 444; 980 N.Y.S.2d 80
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered July 2, 2012, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. In this personal injury action, plaintiff alleged that he sustained injuries when he slipped and fell in his hotel bathroom. At his deposition, plaintiff testified that the bathroom floor appe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-02-06 · Published · cited 7× · 114 A.D.3d 444; 980 N.Y.S.2d 80
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered July 2, 2012, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. In this personal injury action, plaintiff alleged that he sustained injuries when he slipped and fell in his hotel bathroom. At his deposition, plaintiff testified that the bathroom floor appe
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 IL App (5th) 230501
NOTICE 2025 IL App (5th) 230501 Decision filed 02/04/25. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0501 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ KEVIN D.
Potts v. Kel, LLCpublic domain
North Carolina Business Court · 2021-11-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NCBC 72
Potts v. KEL, LLC, 2021 NCBC 72. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION IREDELL COUNTY 16 CVS 2877 W. AVALON POTTS, derivatively on behalf of Steel Tube, Inc., Plaintiff, v. KEL, LLC; RIVES & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Defendants, and ORDER AND OPINION ON
District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017-06-07 · Published · cited 2× · 255 F. Supp. 3d 1187; 2017 WL 2472366; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87780
ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, UNITED . STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This fraudulent transfer action comes before the Court on plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 98) and defendants’ Motion for Summary .Judgment (doc. 99). Both of these overlapping Rule 56 Motions have .been briefed, with considerable duplication of argument along the way, and are now ripe for disposition. I. Nat
North Carolina Business Court · 2020-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 NCBC 49
Glover Construction Co. v. Sequoia Servs., LLC, 2020 NCBC 49. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 18 CVS 1900 GLOVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON CROSS- MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY SEQUOIA SERVICES, LLC,
New York Supreme Court · 2018-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
Stuart's LLC and WAYNE GALVIN, Plaintiffs, againstStuart Edelman, LEVEL 8 APPAREL, LLC, WORLD CROSS CULTURE, INC., WORLDWIDE SOURCING GROUP, LLC, SEUNG BON KIM a/k/a SCOTT KIM a/k/a SAM KIM, PETER LISTER, MICHAEL HONG and MARY-LEE EDELMAN, Defendants. 012560-09
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 977 F. Supp. 2d 372; 2013 WL 5603896; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147273
MEMORANDUM SHERIDAN, District Judge. This non-jury case was tried before the Court over thirteen separate days in April and May, 2013. After trial, the parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as well as briefs, and thereafter, summations were heard. The Court, having considered the parties’ submissions and having deliberated over the facts and the law, submits this memorandum as
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013-09-23 · Published · cited 3× · 973 F. Supp. 2d 820; 2013 WL 5317460; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135543
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiff, Randy Martin, brought this action on July 11, 2011 against the Defendants, Performance Boat Brokerage.com, LLC and Matthew Edward Smith, for damages and injunctive relief, alleging violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Tennessee Code Annotated § 47-1
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015-09-08 · Published · cited 35× · 129 F. Supp. 3d 336; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120214; 2015 WL 5247606
MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge. Before the Court are multiple motions, including Defendant Merkle, Inc.’s. Motion for Summary Judgment (“Merkle’s Motion for Summary Judgment”);- Defendant Drew May’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“May’s Motion for Summary Judgment”), and Defendant Drew May’s Motion to Strike Declarations and Other Material (“Motion to Strike”), For the reasons
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013-02-08 · Published · cited 0× · 109 Fed. Cl. 243; 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 73; 2013 WL 500346
CRADA and Licensing Agreement; Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; “Reasonableness” Standard; Prior Material Breach; Reliance Damages; Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 349 TRIAL OPINION FIRESTONE, Judge. This breach of contract case involves a contract, called a Cooperative Research and Development A
District Court, D. Maryland · 2013-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 974 F. Supp. 2d 790; 2013 WL 5432346; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140210
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION MARVIN J. GARBIS, District Judge. The Court has heard the evidence, reviewed the exhibits, considered the materials submitted by the parties, and had the benefit of the arguments of counsel. The Court now issues this Memorandum of Decision as its findings of fact and conclusions of law in compliance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2016-03-31 · Published · cited 53× · 176 F. Supp. 3d 137; 2016 WL 1273232
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Innovation Ventures, LLC; Living Essentials, LLC; and International IP Holdings, LLC (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “Living Essentials”) commenced this action alleging that defendants have been involved in a widespread scheme to manufacture, distribute, and sell counterfeit 5-hour ENERGY drinks bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks and copyrig
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 19× · 529 B.R. 455; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 1340
MEMORANDUM Joan N. Feeney, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the Motion of the Plaintiff Joseph G. Butler, the Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of Neil St. John Raymond (the “Debtor”), for Leave to Amend Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7015(a) for the purposes of adding defendants and a claim for relief. The
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2024-10-16 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-23-00100-CV GULF VIEW PRIVATE INVESTMENT, INC. f/k/a Whitesell International, Inc., Neil Whitesell, Vincent Costantino, Adam Arters, Innova Aerospace Service & Support, LLC and Sierra Industries, LLC,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-09-19 · Published · cited 2× · 116 F.4th 32
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1673 TIFFANY BRIERE, individually and as parent and guardian of M.P., a minor, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.; FIRST STUDENT, INC., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT